Article

2016-09-12 Home Front: Politix

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-12 05:56|| || Front Page|| [11131 views ] Top

#1 As I said yesterday, it was a "dog whistle" to fire up the Democrat voter base. I suspect that there's a few, more... circumspect, efforts being made as well.

Posted by Pappy 2016-09-12 08:11|| 2016-09-12 08:11|| Front Page Top

#2 It's the Fed bureaucracy which counts the votes.

Last time I checked, it was the state and specifically local residents that counted the votes. Even in the (in)famous 2000 race, the locals had to do it again by county in Florida.

And if it was a 'dog whistle' it only points out clearly the bigotry, hate, and intolerance of the Left's base. If you don't agree with them, you're not 'stupid' you're the enemy to be stereotyped and eliminated.

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-09-12 09:24|| 2016-09-12 09:24|| Front Page Top

#3 Complaints of irregularities are investigated by?
Or do you doubt the democratic cadre's ability to lodge complaints?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2016-09-12 09:31|| 2016-09-12 09:31|| Front Page Top

#4 Like Hugh Hewitt said in one of his books, we have to win so BIG that it would be impossible to tilt the results by cheating. A toss up state will do Democratic because of fraud. A pro-Trump landslide state can't be tilted by fraud.

So win by a landslide, purge the federal bureaucracy of the true believers. And hopefully enough states will ride the coat tails to make a difference in local politics.

Embarrass the main stream media with a landslide with make McGovern/Nixon look like a photo finish.

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2016-09-12 10:31|| 2016-09-12 10:31|| Front Page Top

#5 From what I've read today she could be replaced and even though ballots are printed the electoral votes to her would still be counted for her replacement.

Of course the confusion of folks looking for Biden or Sanders on a ballot and only finding Clinton would be massive and ensure the Democrats lose, and further that the dumber ones are convinced it was stolen because of the ballot mix-ups.

Posted by rjschwarz 2016-09-12 13:47|| 2016-09-12 13:47|| Front Page Top

#6 I'll be interested in seeing the impact caused by the influence buyers.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-09-12 13:58|| 2016-09-12 13:58|| Front Page Top

#7 A very subtle dog whistle indeed, like "Hey! Fido! Come smell my ass."

Posted by regular joe 2016-09-12 14:04|| 2016-09-12 14:04|| Front Page Top

#8 From what I've read today she could be replaced and even though ballots are printed the electoral votes to her would still be counted for her replacement.

Technically, you do not vote for the candidate, but a roster of Electors who have committed to vote for the candidate when the Electoral College convenes to cast their ballots. Gee, those stupid white (and sometimes slave-holding) founders may have been on to something. Listen to the silence on the Left that has for years talked about doing away with the College and just go with a direct vote.

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-09-12 15:45|| 2016-09-12 15:45|| Front Page Top

23:49 anon1
23:44 George Gurly-Brown7324
23:31 Crusader
23:21 Crusader
23:16 newc
23:08 phil_b
22:59 Glenmore
22:54 trailing wife
22:44 Crusader
22:37 Jack salami
22:32 Jack salami
22:31 Crusader
22:18 Frank G
22:13 USN, Ret.
21:52 USN, Ret.
21:50 USN, Ret.
21:34 Blossom Unains5562
21:28 Blossom Unains5562
21:20 newc
21:18 newc
21:04 Anguper Hupomosing9418
20:59 SteveS
20:58 Pappy
20:53 Blossom Hupager6063