Article

2016-06-23 Home Front: Politix

Pagliano takes Fifth in deposition: 125 times

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2016-06-23 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11132 views ] Top

#1 So the Clinton Foundation or other Hillary supporter's money found its way to Pagliano for shutting up? He took the 5th every 1.4 minutes in this deposition. Waste of time other than to cast more suspicion on the Hildabeest and her cover up. It's about time for a special prosecutor to clean up this mess since Loretta Lynch has been shown to be a partisan hack who's not interested in justice but only doing the bidding of the Party and her boss. Once again the people get the shaft.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-06-23 09:17|| 2016-06-23 09:17|| Front Page Top

#2 Alternatively, even with the well publicized and anticipated immunity, Pag dodged any/all substantial questions suggesting to the public narrative that HE was the root of the email issues, not Hilarity.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-06-23 10:01|| 2016-06-23 10:01|| Front Page Top

#3 a Special Prosecutor will just extend the timeline past November. It's not the solution

Posted by Frank G 2016-06-23 11:02|| 2016-06-23 11:02|| Front Page Top

#4 Up there with "Glengarry Glen Ross," where f*ck was said 121 times in 114 minutes...

Posted by M. Murcek 2016-06-23 12:09|| 2016-06-23 12:09|| Front Page Top

#5 That must be a record.

Posted by JohnQC 2016-06-23 12:25|| 2016-06-23 12:25|| Front Page Top

#6 Last words of Dylan Thomas: "Eighteen whiskys. A new record!"

Posted by M. Murcek 2016-06-23 12:26|| 2016-06-23 12:26|| Front Page Top

#7 Pagliano can just give his 5th amendment card to Huma. My bet is she will do the same. On the other hand, she might develop a severe case of amnesia.

Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2016-06-23 12:46|| 2016-06-23 12:46|| Front Page Top

#8 I thought he was granted immunity. If so, wouldn't this require him to answer the questions to retain that immunity? Obviously not, but just in case . . . .

Posted by gorb 2016-06-23 13:36|| 2016-06-23 13:36|| Front Page Top

#9 Immunity from criminal prosecution. This was a conservative watchdog deposition.

Maybe he can't answer because he has to spill the beans in the criminal trial?

Nice thought, ain't it?

Posted by Bobby 2016-06-23 13:52|| 2016-06-23 13:52|| Front Page Top

#10 He was given use immunity: what he says can't be used against him, but prosecutors can use what he says to find other things that they can use.

Posted by Steve White 2016-06-23 15:31|| 2016-06-23 15:31|| Front Page Top

#11 Every 36 seconds...

Posted by 49 Pan 2016-06-23 20:27|| 2016-06-23 20:27|| Front Page Top

23:41 3dc
22:32 3dc
22:31 3dc
22:29 3dc
22:24 3dc
20:27 49 Pan
19:34 trailing wife
19:24 trailing wife
18:52 trailing wife
18:48 Albemarle Hapsburg4595
16:59 Silentbrick
16:50 Skidmark
16:49 Bright Pebbles
16:33 SteveS
16:30 AlanC
16:20 gorb
15:53 Besoeker
15:39 gorb
15:31 Steve White
15:29 Steve White
15:21 USN, Ret.
15:17 USN, Ret.
15:17 Spinesing Gray3122
15:13 Raj