Article

2016-02-21 -Lurid Crime Tales-

'Rolling Stone' Magazine's 'Jackie' To Appear In Court

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2016-02-21 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11125 views ] Top

#1 Jackie has remained anonymous throughout the entire process.

So unlike Joe the Plumber, her records in hands of government personnel will remain secured. One set of rules for me, another set of rules for thee.

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-02-21 08:53|| 2016-02-21 08:53|| Front Page Top

#2 The difference: Joe the Plumber was outed by a state government official who abused her power.

Ms. Jackie Coakley's identity has been protected not by the state, but by the press -- either as a deal in exchange for an interview (per WaPo) or as part of the rape narrative.

Posted by Steve White 2016-02-21 11:38|| 2016-02-21 11:38|| Front Page Top

#3 ...Seems there are a few possible results here:

1:) Jackie shows up and confesses. (Damned unlikely.)
1a:) Jackie shows up and says UVa is blaming her to cover up the whole thing and make her look bad. (More likely than you might think.)
2:) Jackie shows up and refuses to testify because she feels 'unsafe'. (More likely than anything else; no judge in America today will impose any sanction on her.)
3. Jackie refuses to show up at all. (Roughly as likely as #2)

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2016-02-21 12:20|| 2016-02-21 12:20|| Front Page Top

#4 A local police investigation found " no evidence " to support "Jackie's" claims.

FOIA. Not going to comply.

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-02-21 12:31|| 2016-02-21 12:31|| Front Page Top

#5 "to appear in court to be deposed"

That's a little unusual. In my experience, depositions take place either in one of the attorneys' offices (if one has an office in the deponent's area) or a neutral location such as a conference room in a local hotel. (The idea is to keep the deponent from having to pay out money to travel.)

Wonder what that's all about?

Posted by Barbara 2016-02-21 15:22|| 2016-02-21 15:22|| Front Page Top

#6 Good catch, Barbara. My experience has been the same

Posted by Frank G 2016-02-21 15:53|| 2016-02-21 15:53|| Front Page Top

#7 Wonder what that's all about?

I wonder if the judge wants to see if the "jackie" creature exists, and does not trust any of the parties involved.

Posted by Nguard 2016-02-21 20:45|| 2016-02-21 20:45|| Front Page Top

#8 Good point, #7 NG.

Posted by Barbara 2016-02-21 22:04|| 2016-02-21 22:04|| Front Page Top

23:39 M. Murcek
23:36 newc
23:32 newc
23:29 JosephMendiola
23:27 trailing wife
22:38 JosephMendiola
22:36 newc
22:35 gorb
22:35 JosephMendiola
22:31 regular joe
22:30 JosephMendiola
22:27 Skidmark
22:25 Skidmark
22:04 Barbara
22:00 Iblis
21:55 Bill Clinton
21:29 Procopius2k
21:20 Dale
21:17 DarthVader
20:45 Nguard
20:11 Whiskey Mike
20:11 Rambler in Virginia
20:08 Shipman
20:05 Shipman