Article

2015-07-22 Olde Tyme Religion

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by lord garth 2015-07-22 08:47|| || Front Page|| [11130 views ] Top

#1 But the latest possible date of the Birmingham discovery - 645 - would put it among the very oldest.

And the earliest possible date would put it before Mohammed was born. There's very little actual information in the article. To properly evaluate the claim, we'd need to know:
1) Did they date the ink and parchment, or just the parchment? In other words, what's the over/under on whether this is a palimpsest?
2) What passages does the fragment contain? Are they definitely not the sections which supposedly read like older Syraic Christian hymns, which some scholars thought were incorporated by the Koran's compilers?
3) Do the scholars think this fragment is from a Hafsaic Koran, or is there any indication that it's part of one of the "private Korans" with possibly variant text ordered burned by Uthman in 653?

If this report is true, this moves back the first extant verses from the Dome of the Rock inscriptions circa 691/2.

Hmm, the Guardian article on the report indicates the fragment is suras 18-20. The same paragraph:

The significance of Birmingham’s leaves, which hold part of Suras (chapters) 18 to 20, was missed because they were bound together with another text, in a very similar hand but written almost 200 years later.

kind of leads to the "palimpsest" theory, if the fragment is in the same hand as the rest of the text, though.

Posted by Mitch H. 2015-07-22 12:07|| http://blogfonte.blogspot.com/ 2015-07-22 12:07|| Front Page Top

#2 Burn it on t

Posted by chris 2015-07-22 12:36|| 2015-07-22 12:36|| Front Page Top

#3 Did it say made in Taiwan on the back?

Did it have "Page 3"?

Was it a "prized goat" skin?

Posted by AlanC 2015-07-22 13:31|| 2015-07-22 13:31|| Front Page Top

#4 fwiw,

sura 18, 19 and 20 are all meccan

Posted by lord garth 2015-07-22 14:19|| 2015-07-22 14:19|| Front Page Top

#5 It seems to say "just kidding."

Posted by rjschwarz 2015-07-22 14:22|| 2015-07-22 14:22|| Front Page Top

#6 The original koran was a fragmentation bomb? It sure fits.

Posted by BrerRabbit 2015-07-22 16:05|| 2015-07-22 16:05|| Front Page Top

#7 I wonder how the text compares to modern Korans

Fatwa in 5..4..3

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2015-07-22 16:11|| 2015-07-22 16:11|| Front Page Top

#8 Was it a "prized goat" skin?

And if so, what was it written with? Eeww...

I wonder how the text compares to modern Korans

It says "Pwned, suckers!!" Who knew "pwned" went back that far?

Posted by charger 2015-07-22 18:58|| 2015-07-22 18:58|| Front Page Top

22:17 JosephMendiola
22:14 JosephMendiola
21:49 JosephMendiola
21:29 JosephMendiola
21:25 JosephMendiola
21:05 Silentbrick
20:58 Nguard
18:58 charger
18:57 Zenobia Floger6220
18:28 JohnQC
18:17 JohnQC
17:12 rjschwarz
16:30 Hupineger Glomomp52169
16:14 European Conservative
16:11 g(r)omgoru
16:05 BrerRabbit
15:55 regular joe
15:44 gorb
15:18 trailing wife
15:11 CrazyFool
15:03 Zenobia Floger6220
14:49 BigEdLB
14:35 Zenobia Floger6220
14:27 Mike Kozlowski