Article

2015-04-03 Syria-Lebanon-Iran

Iran Accuses U.S. of Lying About New Nuke Agreement

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2015-04-03 05:39|| || Front Page|| [11130 views ] Top

#1 He promised them actual physical help in removing the Zionist Entity, and now denies it?

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2015-04-03 06:25|| 2015-04-03 06:25|| Front Page Top

#2 Who hasn't O lied to? You think you're special?

Posted by Procopius2k 2015-04-03 08:40|| 2015-04-03 08:40|| Front Page Top

#3 If you like your Zionist Entity, you can keep your Zionist Entity.

Snark of the day.

Posted by Matt 2015-04-03 09:19|| 2015-04-03 09:19|| Front Page Top

#4 Regardless of whether you think the American negotiators are lying or they're mistaken, neither bodes well for the implementation of the framework. If they're trying to mislead Congress, the country and our allies about the nature of the agreement, it's a dead letter. If they think the nature of the agreement is one thing and the Iranians think it's another, then the end result is again, either a dead letter, or another round of fruitless negotiation.

Whether the administration is composed of self-deluded pollyannas or treasonous curs, the only question is whether they succeed in throwing away established sanctions and leverage on their lie/delusion. There is zero chance those assholes will do anything but waste treasure and time.

Posted by Mitch H. 2015-04-03 09:21|| 2015-04-03 09:21|| Front Page Top

#5 Why would you expect this administration to enforce any 'agreement' than any laws governing immigration and national sovereignty? That should be the line in Congress. Anything else is just theater to cover their asses when crap hits the fan.

Posted by Procopius2k 2015-04-03 10:20|| 2015-04-03 10:20|| Front Page Top

#6 the administration is composed of self-deluded pollyannas or treasonous curs,

Mitch, the answer for this administration is YES to both. A few individuals have even managed to be two in one.

Posted by AlanC 2015-04-03 11:15|| 2015-04-03 11:15|| Front Page Top

#7 Now wait a minute. Is this an agreement or a tentative framework for continued negotiations on an agreement? Sounds like it's really another stall tactic.

Posted by Abu Uluque 2015-04-03 11:19|| 2015-04-03 11:19|| Front Page Top

#8 Short read: Dangerous holes in U.S.-Iran nuke deal: Bailey

Posted by Hupineger Glomomp52169 2015-04-03 12:33|| 2015-04-03 12:33|| Front Page Top

#9 Read that as
Dangerous a-holes

Posted by swksvolFF 2015-04-03 18:08|| 2015-04-03 18:08|| Front Page Top

23:49 JosephMendiola
23:21 Procopius2k
22:47 Thing From Snowy Mountain
22:46 Thing From Snowy Mountain
22:25 chris
22:20 Alaska Paul
22:12 Alaska Paul
22:09 Alaska Paul
21:59 Alaska Paul
21:55 Frank G
21:46 JosephMendiola
21:45 Goober Floth5538
21:44 tipover
21:15 Frank G
21:13 badanov
21:01 trailing wife
20:57 swksvolFF
20:10 swksvolFF
19:35 Deacon Blues
18:55 Vernal Spavins7649
18:49 bigjim-CA
18:36 Vernal Spavins7649
18:26 swksvolFF
18:08 swksvolFF