Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 01/21/2015 View Tue 01/20/2015 View Mon 01/19/2015 View Sun 01/18/2015 View Sat 01/17/2015 View Fri 01/16/2015 View Thu 01/15/2015
1
2015-01-21 Home Front: Politix
A-10 'Warthog' Sends ISIS Fleeing - Air Force Wants to Scrap
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2015-01-21 16:12|| || Front Page|| [15 views ]  Top

#1 Of course they do.

They want more jets for their jet jockies and don't give a damn if it helps the grunts or not.

Posted by DarthVader 2015-01-21 17:53||   2015-01-21 17:53|| Front Page Top

#2 The plane is not as fast and lacks the graceful lines of other fighter jets. But the Warthog, as pilots call it due to the snout-like nose, is extremely low maintenance, flies low, can practically hover over a battlefield, land almost anywhere and packs a 20-foot-long, 2.5-ton, seven-barrel Gatling gun that can fire more than 1,100 rounds of 30-mm. bullets. And a titanium shell that wraps around the bottom of its cockpit makes it difficult to shoot down.

Whoah now, that sounds treasonous. Getting pretty close to a capital T there Darth.
Posted by swksvolFF 2015-01-21 18:13||   2015-01-21 18:13|| Front Page Top

#3 Eh... I've already committed treason (according to the liberals) by doubting Obama, calling for smaller government and private healthcare, calling for the resignation of most of the government and a new vote, questioning the wisdom of the so-called illuminated "experts" by bringing up facts instead of propaganda.
Posted by DarthVader 2015-01-21 18:26||   2015-01-21 18:26|| Front Page Top

#4 *Question:
Will the STOL/VTOL version F-35 leave a nice heat signiture where the center turbine is? I heard a deal that the Harriers were not only particularly vulnerable, but had a lower survivability rate on account of heat missiles striking the middle of the aircraft. (Yes I know the additional turbine is takeoff/landing not in flight)

Second, as CAS, doesn't adding the pylons and weapons negate the stealthyness of the airframe and defeat the purpose? Also, gun runs - F-35 25mm with 120 rounds (wiki) vs. A-10 30mm with 1100 rounds.

I just learned that there is a version of the A-10 which is used to fly into hail storms.

The F-35 may end up being a decent plane, but to say it will replace the A-10 in CAS is like saying a Volt is going to haul my boat to the lake. Its using a trash bag to replace a broken window. Especially if the 35 has pilot visibility issues and 2-3 seconds of ammo.
Posted by swksvolFF 2015-01-21 18:43||   2015-01-21 18:43|| Front Page Top

#5 Whether the F-35 can assume the CAS mission can be debated by the experts. What CANNOT be debated is the obvious attempt to ditch the A-10 prior to fielding of a replacement platform, F-35 or whatever.

Building a fuc*ing tactical capabilities gap is not smart snooker, it's pure politics !
Posted by Besoeker 2015-01-21 19:00||   2015-01-21 19:00|| Front Page Top

#6 To have an AF General throw that word out for criticizing his opinion is disturbing.

Posted by swksvolFF 2015-01-21 19:45||   2015-01-21 19:45|| Front Page Top

#7 The questions to be asked:
1 How combat effective is the aircraft?
2 Compared to the alternative, what is the cost per sortie?
3 Does it make the enemy shake in it's boots?
I'm pretty sure we all know the answers. Fly on you magnificent bastards.
Posted by Past Master of the Obvious 2015-01-21 21:20||   2015-01-21 21:20|| Front Page Top

#8 Here's an ignorant, but serious, question. Why can't the Air Force simply give this plane up to another organization? Seems the Marines would love it, but maybe even a dedicated State ANG unit, or even private/contract outfits? They're custom repaired now anyways, so why not get them out of the USAF/DOD procurement racket?
Posted by Ebberese Dribble3663 2015-01-21 21:54||   2015-01-21 21:54|| Front Page Top

#9 Why don't they just use F-35s now? Isn't it one of the roles they've been assigned? Or are they busy preparing the battlespace for the next boondoggle?
Posted by gorb 2015-01-21 21:57||   2015-01-21 21:57|| Front Page Top

#10 By ditching the A-10, that is.
Posted by gorb 2015-01-21 21:57||   2015-01-21 21:57|| Front Page Top

#11 Money is the root of all evil. No money in it for the manufacturers who pressure the brass for business.

In other words, in a FEW military manufacturing sectors, money is more important than our troops.
Posted by Ebbomosh Hupemp2664 2015-01-21 23:16||   2015-01-21 23:16|| Front Page Top

23:38 JosephMendiola
23:34 JosephMendiola
23:24 JosephMendiola
23:22 Rob Crawford
23:20 JosephMendiola
23:18 JosephMendiola
23:16 Ebbomosh Hupemp2664
23:09 JosephMendiola
23:06 JosephMendiola
22:35 James
22:19 Frank G
21:57 gorb
21:57 gorb
21:54 Ebberese Dribble3663
21:54 gorb
21:39 JosephMendiola
21:32 badanov
21:20 Past Master of the Obvious
21:01 Pappy
20:58 Pappy
20:57 Pappy
20:50 Whaling Bonaparte8551
20:37 trailing wife
20:25 chris









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com