Article

2014-07-11 Government

Federal judge to IRS: Explain these "lost" e-mails, please ... under oath

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by DarthVader 2014-07-11 10:56|| || Front Page|| [5 views ] Top

#1 I expect a major audit of this judge soon....

Posted by DarthVader 2014-07-11 10:57|| 2014-07-11 10:57|| Front Page Top

#2 objectification trigger follows

Helmet hair worn by Lois of Arc
Is no armor to arrows of snark.
For a sexier style,
Males would fall in a pile,
All aquiver awaiting a spark.

Posted by Zenobia Floger6220 2014-07-11 11:19|| 2014-07-11 11:19|| Front Page Top

#3 Er, bulwark. Also, bois. PIMP.

Posted by Zenobia Floger6220 2014-07-11 11:23|| 2014-07-11 11:23|| Front Page Top

#4 The only problem with this is that those who are involved have no compunction about lying under oath. The other problem is that of proof. However, the judge could charge people for contempt if he finds that there is proof they lied under oath.

Posted by JohnQC 2014-07-11 12:53|| 2014-07-11 12:53|| Front Page Top

#5 Once the judge has the IRS statement as to what happened, he has a baseline for further investigation or comparisons to what Isa has already found. Any determination presented by the IRS should be backed up by evidence or proof, not just a sworn statement. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Posted by Besoeker 2014-07-11 14:12|| 2014-07-11 14:12|| Front Page Top

#6 Last week Obama, leader of the democratic party and self appointed constitutional expert, declared the supreme court to be wrong. His hacks, Reid and Pelosi, Posed the argument they will go around the supreme court. I suppose this will be the first of many federal judges that have decided enough is enough and playing politics with the law has gone far enough. When the IRS testifies over the emails, or more aptly claims the 5th, all hell is going to break loose if these so called activist judges decide our constitution is at risk and they take it on themselves to get things back in order. I just bought a large box of popcorn this will get fun...

Posted by 49 Pan 2014-07-11 14:36|| 2014-07-11 14:36|| Front Page Top

#7 Palin doubles down on call for impeachment.

Posted by Thineng Angailet7166 2014-07-11 15:32|| 2014-07-11 15:32|| Front Page Top

#8 Contempt? How about perjury.

Posted by CrazyFool 2014-07-11 16:22|| 2014-07-11 16:22|| Front Page Top

#9 Yes perjury too.

Posted by JohnQC 2014-07-11 17:40|| 2014-07-11 17:40|| Front Page Top

#10 There were two hearings before two judges. A summary is: Here. Note the judge's comments.

Posted by JohnQC 2014-07-11 18:12|| 2014-07-11 18:12|| Front Page Top

23:59 DarthVader
23:02 Redneck Jim
22:41 Redneck Jim
21:56 Pancho Elmaling8075
21:36 Frank G
21:31 Frank G
21:18 Besoeker
21:16 Frank G
21:14 49 Pan
21:12 Frank G
20:38 badanov
20:31 abu do you love
20:29 Frank G
20:19 Frank G
20:08 Frank G
20:06 Zenobia Floger6220
19:58 Thing From Snowy Mountain
19:31 charger
19:08 ed in texas
18:56 Bright Pebbles
18:12 JohnQC
18:07 49 Pan
17:44 Zenobia Floger6220
17:44 49 Pan