Article

2014-04-22 -Land of the Free

Supreme Court upholds Mich Affirmative Action ban.

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2014-04-22 10:20|| || Front Page|| [11129 views ] Top

#1 Does this mean we are one big happy family again ?

Posted by Chinese Charlie 2014-04-22 11:30|| 2014-04-22 11:30|| Front Page Top

#2 No, Champ's Sotomayor is NOT happy, and she'll be sitting a lot longer than the other dissenter- Justice Ginsberg.

Posted by Bobby 2014-04-22 11:38|| 2014-04-22 11:38|| Front Page Top

#3 "content of character, not color of skin" - that old racist, - MLK, Jr. The MAN keeping minorities down

Posted by Frank G 2014-04-22 13:05|| 2014-04-22 13:05|| Front Page Top

#4 Great blow againt neo-apartheid.

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2014-04-22 14:00|| 2014-04-22 14:00|| Front Page Top

#5 Three years later, affirmative action opponents persuaded Michigan voters to change the state constitution to outlaw any consideration of race.

They speak as if the voters were for Affirmitive Action before - I'm not sure of that was the case.

Yahoo news - not quite as biased as MNBC - but not for lack of trying...

Posted by CrazyFool 2014-04-22 17:31|| 2014-04-22 17:31|| Front Page Top

#6 Sotomayor took twelve minutes to summarize her dissent.

"We cannot wish away racial inequality," she said. The Bronx-born justice has written extensively about the role affirmative action played in her own education.

Bottom line: Discrimination is necessary to solve discrimination. WTF ?

Posted by Besoeker 2014-04-22 18:33|| 2014-04-22 18:33|| Front Page Top

#7 Sotomayor knows how she got HER job....

Posted by Glenmore 2014-04-22 19:33|| 2014-04-22 19:33|| Front Page Top

#8 Sotomeyor in some indirect way proves why affirmative action results in less than optimal outcomes as she puts in 12 minutes of effort and expects a positive outcome in her favor.

Posted by Airandee 2014-04-22 19:56|| 2014-04-22 19:56|| Front Page Top

#9 ginsberg joined sotomayor's opinion saying that, in essence, equal opportunity is unconstitutional

sad

very sad

Posted by lord garth 2014-04-22 21:08|| 2014-04-22 21:08|| Front Page Top

#10 So... Sotamayor's official position is that minorities are inferior?

Posted by Rob Crawford 2014-04-22 23:00|| 2014-04-22 23:00|| Front Page Top

#11 As a white male, my degrees from the UofM have always carried the cache of 80's affirmative action.

To be clear, everyone knows I was discriminated against, yet succeeded.

Bite my ass, Sotomayor.

Posted by rammer 2014-04-22 23:03|| 2014-04-22 23:03|| Front Page Top

23:37 trailing wife
23:12 rammer
23:03 rammer
23:00 Rob Crawford
22:53 JosephMendiola
22:09 Jeremiah Thusock1229
21:56 Alaska Paul
21:08 lord garth
21:08 SteveS
21:07 BrerRabbit
20:31 JosephMendiola
19:56 Airandee
19:49 JosephMendiola
19:33 European Conservative
19:33 Glenmore
19:28 Bubba Graiting8281
19:00 P2Kontheroad
18:49 Bright Pebbles
18:48 Barbara
18:42 badanov
18:38 OldSpook
18:35 Shipman
18:33 Besoeker
18:23 Shipman