Article

2013-12-21 Great White North

Canada's supreme court strikes down anti-prostitution laws

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2013-12-21 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11132 views ] Top

#1 When people start "choosing" to sell their own flesh for consumption as meat, some supreme court will probably strike down laws against cannabilism. You read it here first.

Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2013-12-21 02:54|| 2013-12-21 02:54|| Front Page Top

#2 Not a whole lot different than aftermarket selling of kidney, testicle, cornea, lung or liver parts, AH.

Posted by Skidmark 2013-12-21 07:09|| 2013-12-21 07:09|| Front Page Top

#3 ...sperm, eggs, blood, etc. As for flesh, the three letter cable channels have shown a number of oversized individuals who get 'excess' flesh removed after losing a lot of weight. Don't worry though, the nanny state FDA will step in quickly to demand 'hefty' regulatory paper and fee requirements that will make it a very short lived market.

Posted by P2kontheroad 2013-12-21 09:32|| 2013-12-21 09:32|| Front Page Top

#4 Will traditional totalitarian gov't inspection numbers be used ?

Posted by Besoeker 2013-12-21 09:45|| 2013-12-21 09:45|| Front Page Top

#5 Is Canada going to soon start competing with Nevada in the flesh market?

Posted by JohnQC 2013-12-21 12:00|| 2013-12-21 12:00|| Front Page Top

#6 If you read the article it implies but doesn't say that prostitution has been tolerated in Canada for a while, its the forms of 'delivery' (The Canadian government had argued that hookers choose to accept those risks) that have been restricted or outlawed.

Posted by P2kontheroad 2013-12-21 12:27|| 2013-12-21 12:27|| Front Page Top

#7 Here in the Royal Navy, we have the cannibalism problem relatively under control....

Posted by Thing From Snowy Mountain 2013-12-21 14:10|| 2013-12-21 14:10|| Front Page Top

#8 An appeals court agreed, but upheld a ban on communicating for the purposes of selling sex. I wonder how the decision was stated? No verbal communication? No knowing-come-hither looks?

Posted by JohnQC 2013-12-21 14:49|| 2013-12-21 14:49|| Front Page Top

23:53 Silentbrick - Schlumberger Squishy Mud Division
22:57 Barbara
22:09 swksvolFF
22:03 Richard Aubrey
21:09 swksvolFF
20:08 Pappy
20:03 Barbara
19:30 Glenmore
19:12 Deacon Blues
19:11 Redneck Jim
19:07 Redneck Jim
19:05 Deacon Blues
18:53 mossomo
18:19 Nimble Spemble
18:15 Steve White
18:12 Frank G
18:09 Frank G
18:05 Frank G
18:02 Frank G
17:49 Frank G
17:42 Frank G
16:52 Thing From Snowy Mountain
16:02 Glenmore
15:54 Frank G