Article

2013-10-20 Science & Technology

Healthcare.gov IT managers are in "pants-wetting panic"

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Frozen Al 2013-10-20 12:34|| || Front Page|| [11130 views ] Top

#1 Some blame the contractors involved

And there you have it once again.

Posted by Besoeker 2013-10-20 13:30|| 2013-10-20 13:30|| Front Page Top

#2 the biggest contractor involved in building the site, was not provided with the information it needed to start writing code for the site until the spring of this year. This detail in the story aroused some shock and surprise among outside web developers, and these CMS officials say its just not true.

I bet it IS true. I'd guess "Information" was provided it just wasn't what was asked for or useful.

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2013-10-20 16:50|| 2013-10-20 16:50|| Front Page Top

#3 ...gov't healthcare admin (in)competence from 2006...:

OurPolicy is to Always Blame the Computer: Will Healthcare Computing Incompetence Kill the Elderly?

Posted by Uncle Phester 2013-10-20 16:52|| 2013-10-20 16:52|| Front Page Top

#4 My thinking that the specs were being 'changed' at even a basic level right up to a few weeks before the turnover. Designed by committee.

Posted by CrazyFool 2013-10-20 19:34|| 2013-10-20 19:34|| Front Page Top

#5 Designed by SEVERAL committees, with no central deciding authority.

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2013-10-20 21:04|| 2013-10-20 21:04|| Front Page Top

#6 fast, cheap, good. It's always pick 2.

Most likely they didn't have a competent lead. Without someone in charge (who has authority and competency) projects fail.

Personal experience with govt is you never get the authority you need, but you never really get punished either.

Posted by flash91 2013-10-20 22:51|| 2013-10-20 22:51|| Front Page Top

#7 Also likely is that every congresscritter and their aid wanted in on the action. Meaning that they likely got leads and managers who were there based on patronage over qualifications. From designers to analysts to coders (who knows if there any testers...).

All based on who they know, skin color, sexual orientation, gender, etc.... instead of qualifications and experience.

Posted by CrazyFool 2013-10-20 23:46|| 2013-10-20 23:46|| Front Page Top

23:46 CrazyFool
22:51 flash91
22:26 Anging Hatfield6648
22:17 SteveS
22:16 SteveS
21:17 Abu Uluque
21:12 Abu Uluque
21:04 Bright Pebbles
20:43 Pappy
19:59 Barbara
19:54 Barbara
19:34 CrazyFool
18:49 Frank G
17:41 RandomJD
17:19 Glenmore
16:52 Uncle Phester
16:50 Bright Pebbles
16:30 JohnQC
15:56 DarthVader
15:34 Frank G
15:23 Rambler in Virginia
15:19 Frank G
15:15 Rambler in Virginia
15:13 OldSpook