Article

2013-03-08 Science & Technology

Test Pilots: F-35's Blind Spot Will Get It 'Gunned Every Time'

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Uncle Phester 2013-03-08 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 Oh please. Haters just gonna hate. In the meantime, suck my six.

This is not the 60's. Any pilot who gets close enough to the enemy to have them on their six is already dead. (Test pilots, think about it.)

The visibility out of the F-35 is better than the F-2000 Frenchy fighter or the SU-35, and as I said, if you need visibility there then call your wingman, break, or die.

I am so tired of this endless dribble about how the F-35 is a bad plane. It is not. It is more expensive than current planes, has one engine (which is dumb), is new and has new problems to sort out, and is not quite as nice as we planned when we speced it out. But really, it is pretty sweet and will out-fly anything in the world but an F-15 and an F-22.

Posted by rammer 2013-03-08 00:28|| 2013-03-08 00:28|| Front Page Top

#2 To pile on -- if someone proposed cancelling the F-35 and buying a huge bag of F-18 F/G's for the Navy and F-15's with RCS updates for the Air Force, we would get about the same capability for less money.

(and no, I do not own any Boeing stock.)

But to simply tear down the Lightning II as it grows through its teething phase is pointless.

Posted by rammer 2013-03-08 00:41|| 2013-03-08 00:41|| Front Page Top

#3 Planes with actual human pilots? Ain't that kinda old skool?

Posted by SteveS 2013-03-08 01:23|| 2013-03-08 01:23|| Front Page Top

#4 Excellent point SteveS. A gimbal requires no headrest.

Posted by Besoeker 2013-03-08 01:28|| 2013-03-08 01:28|| Front Page Top

#5 Have they thought about putting a rear facing camera on the plane?

I thought there were cameras everywhere on the plane and you could "see"* through the floor.

*Using goggle HUD

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2013-03-08 08:03|| 2013-03-08 08:03|| Front Page Top

#6 The only reason for dogfights is the ROE. One of the reasons that the Top Gun movie was so funny is that the F-14 was a missile platform designed for fleet defense. It carried six AIM-54 Phoenix missiles that could reach out to 120+ miles. In one of the tests, the F-14 simultaneously launched on six supersonic maneuvering aircraft at a range of 120 miles. It killed all six with the last one going down at 80 miles. The only reason for "dogfighting" was the requirement to "visually" ID the target before engaging. One of many problems caused by too many lawyers.

Posted by rwv 2013-03-08 10:10|| 2013-03-08 10:10|| Front Page Top

#7 back in the Viet Nam war, the F4's were not initially fitted with anything but missles, thinking that machine guns and cannons were a thing of the past. After the soviet MIG's intercepted our Fathoms we had to go in and retro fit them with 20 mm gatling guns.

Posted by texhooey 2013-03-08 13:53|| 2013-03-08 13:53|| Front Page Top

#8 Phantoms :)

Posted by texhooey 2013-03-08 13:54|| 2013-03-08 13:54|| Front Page Top

#9 In the meantime, the Buffer is still flying, sometime 32 hour sorties without any gun:) I believe there are now 3 generations of Buffer crews from the same family.

Posted by Jack is Back! 2013-03-08 16:09|| 2013-03-08 16:09|| Front Page Top

#10 back in the Viet Nam war, the F4's were not initially fitted with anything but missles, thinking that machine guns and cannons were a thing of the past. After the soviet MIG's intercepted our Fathoms we had to go in and retro fit them with 20 mm gatling guns.

This was apparently related to ROE's. It's pretty amazing that they were using ANG draftees as cannon fodder for this kind of nonsense. LBJ is easily one of the worst presidents we've had:

To compound the problem, rules of engagement in Vietnam precluded long-range missile attacks in most instances, as visual identification was normally required. Many pilots found themselves on the tail of an enemy aircraft but too close to fire short-range Falcons or Sidewinders.

Posted by Zhang Fei 2013-03-08 16:45|| 2013-03-08 16:45|| Front Page Top

21:52 Frank G
21:24 DJ Curtis C
21:18 Redneck Jim
21:15 DLR
21:15 swksvolFF
20:36 Frank G
20:01 Thing From Snowy Mountain
19:58 Waldemar Sforza1163
19:47 CrazyFool
19:19 SteveS
19:13 DarthVader
19:10 RandomJD
19:07 Anguper Hupomosing9418
18:54 RandomJD
18:54 Waldemar Sforza1163
18:40 swksvolFF
18:10 Photh Platypus2300
18:03 ed in texas
17:58 Airandee
17:45 swksvolFF
17:08 AuburnTom
17:06 DarthVader
17:05 Muggsy Mussolini1226
16:59 RandomJD