Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 07/05/2012 View Wed 07/04/2012 View Tue 07/03/2012 View Mon 07/02/2012 View Sun 07/01/2012 View Sat 06/30/2012 View Fri 06/29/2012
1
2012-07-05 Home Front: Politix
California immigration bill designed as the "anti-Arizona"
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by gorb 2012-07-05 00:52|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Arizona is quite happy to be the "anti-California".
Posted by Spot 2012-07-05 07:49||   2012-07-05 07:49|| Front Page Top

#2 One of the 'problems' with the Federal law is that persons identified, by local law enforcement officials, as illegal immigrants are to be placed in custody until federal officials are notified.

California doesn't have space to keep people in custody.

Posted by lord garth 2012-07-05 07:53||   2012-07-05 07:53|| Front Page Top

#3 I wonder what Mexico's stance is on illegals in Mexico
I believe they are deported immediately.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia 2012-07-05 08:06||   2012-07-05 08:06|| Front Page Top

#4 Illegals are an untapped resource! Think about it, an illegal is caught, verified and saving who knows how many lives as an involuntary organ donor in less than 24 hours. Under such laws, we could encourage them to come!


/sarc

Though the mere announcement of this would cause massive voluntary deportation:p
Posted by Silentbrick - Schlumberger Squishy Mud Division 2012-07-05 08:54||   2012-07-05 08:54|| Front Page Top

#5 Mexican Constitution -

Article 33. Foreigners are those who do not possess the qualifications set forth in Article 30. They are entitled to the guarantees granted by Chapter I, Title I, of the present Constitution; but the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action.

Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country.

More
Posted by Procopius2k 2012-07-05 08:57||   2012-07-05 08:57|| Front Page Top

#6 Illegal Aliens Undocumented Democrats
Posted by GolfBravoUSMC 2012-07-05 12:00||   2012-07-05 12:00|| Front Page Top

#7 
Posted by junkiron 2012-07-05 12:24||   2012-07-05 12:24|| Front Page Top

#8 I'm afraid it's too late for my home state. We've passed the point of no return. The Mexicans here still tolerate us white folks, for the most part, for the time being. Maybe that's because we still pay our taxes. Oh, and we tip the waiters and busboys.

Racist? No, not really. I just thought California was supposed to be part of the United States and that the United States would defend its territorial integrity.

I blame Bush. No, I really do. He did nothing about it. But it wasn't just him. Clinton's the one who really let the invasion get going. Spit. And don't let anybody fool you. It is an invasion. Just because they come with women and children instead of tanks and war planes doesn't mean it's not an invasion. So is the United States willing to cede California to Mexico? Looks like it.

Wikipedia has a pretty good writeup on Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, of course. Read it if you have the stomach for it.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2012-07-05 12:38||   2012-07-05 12:38|| Front Page Top

#9 Thought "derechos" translates into damaging windstorms. So union jobs at union wages are damaging (windstorms)?

If California passes the anti-Arizona immigration bill, they are going to have to live with it. Good luck to em. Look for California to look like Detroit in a few years. What happens when Californians try to escape this nightmare? Are they going to spread the taint to other states?
Posted by JohnQC 2012-07-05 12:50||   2012-07-05 12:50|| Front Page Top

#10 Are they going to spread the taint to other states?

Posted by Glenmore 2012-07-05 13:58||   2012-07-05 13:58|| Front Page Top

#11 Are they going to spread the taint to other states?

Going to? Check out Las Vegas NOW. Or most of Colorado. Or Portland/Seattle etc.
Posted by Glenmore 2012-07-05 13:59||   2012-07-05 13:59|| Front Page Top

#12 If you somehow believe demographics do NOT matter. Spend some time in Atlanta.
Posted by Besoeker 2012-07-05 14:09||   2012-07-05 14:09|| Front Page Top

#13 OK. So much for blaming Californians. Let's talk about who is really "spreading the taint". Here's a little tidbit from that Wikipedia article about Tom Ammiano that I cited earlier:

Ammiano was born and grew up in Montclair, New Jersey. He attended Seton Hall University in 1963 and received a bachelor's degree in communication. He was an Easter Seals Camp counselor in the summers of 1962-3, later attending San Francisco State University in 1965 where he received a master's degree in special education. He taught English to children in South Vietnam as part of a Quaker program, but left shortly after the Tet Offensive in 1968.

Get it? The guy is from New Jersey. Didn't move here until the mid-1960's along with a couple of million of his friends from New Jersey, New York, Michigan and, yes, even Texas. Even your precious Colorado. So who is "spreading the taint"? Dunno about the rest of you but I'm thinking New Jersey. Californians are the victims.

But, as I said earlier, I'm thinking George W. Bush and Bill Clinton too. Federal problem, folks. This is a federal problem. This is a federal failure as in misfeasance on the part of people that you elected. Stop being so smug and wake the fuck up. I've said it before but you don't seem to get it. If it can happen here it can happen to you.

Question: What will Mitt Romney do about it? What is more important to you: Getting rid of Obamacare or preserving the territorial integrity of the United States of America, California included?
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2012-07-05 14:22||   2012-07-05 14:22|| Front Page Top

#14 Undocumented Democrats

Gulf Bravo gets it in one! It is all about votes.
Posted by SteveS 2012-07-05 14:35||   2012-07-05 14:35|| Front Page Top

#15 If it's all about the votes then why did guys like John McCain and George Bush do nothing about it? Remember, I've said this before too, California used to be a red state. Remember Richard Nixon? Ronald Reagan? Does anybody remember that far back? Why did the Republicans let the Democrats have the state with more electoral college votes than any other state? Why did they let it go without a fight? Why???
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2012-07-05 14:56||   2012-07-05 14:56|| Front Page Top

#16 Cause their spineless.
Posted by Silentbrick - Schlumberger Squishy Mud Division 2012-07-05 15:38||   2012-07-05 15:38|| Front Page Top

#17 If it's all about the votes then why did guys like John McCain and George Bush do nothing about it?

Because they were classical liberals in the line of Truman-Kennedy, not conservatives at all. Just as the Socialist Left captured the Donk Party, the Liberals captured the Trunk Party. It stop being about the Constitution and about being 'loved*', particularly in the MSM [which has been and remains an arm of the other party]. *see Big Tent[tm].
Posted by Procopius2k 2012-07-05 17:03||   2012-07-05 17:03|| Front Page Top

00:00 Redneck Jim
23:44 Steven
23:26 SteveS
23:09 USN, Ret.
23:05 rammer
23:02 trailing wife
22:52 junkiron
22:21 Silentbrick - Schlumberger Squishy Mud Division
21:35 Laurence of the Rats
20:59 rj45acp
20:42 Barbara
20:41 Barbara
20:39 Barbara
20:19 Glenmore
20:15 Glenmore
20:14 Glenmore
20:13 Glenmore
20:08 Glenmore
19:59 crazyhorse
19:53 tu3031
19:50 Glenmore
19:48 tu3031
19:46 Glenmore
19:43 tu3031









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com