Article

2011-12-29 -Short Attention Span Theater-

Libyan rebel T-55 in action, takes a hit [video]

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by gromky 2011-12-29 00:00|| || Front Page|| [1 views ] Top

#1 Not to mention old tank shells.

Agree, IMO it does look like an internal detonation, espec as indic by the poor guy flying up and away.

Except that he isn't SUPERMAN.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2011-12-29 00:36|| 2011-12-29 00:36|| Front Page Top

#2 Video's been pulled. No access.

Posted by Redneck Jim 2011-12-29 01:21|| 2011-12-29 01:21|| Front Page Top

#3 I want a Toyota Hilux w/a 20mm in the back!

If I saw that in a movie, I'd think "the guy" flying through the air looked awful faked...

...but, yeah, I think they blew up their own track, for reasons stated.

Posted by Drang 2011-12-29 01:28|| http://thecluemeter.blogspot.com/ 2011-12-29 01:28|| Front Page Top

#4 Obviously, it blew up because there weren't enough Allahu Akhbars to please Allan.

Posted by gorb 2011-12-29 04:20|| 2011-12-29 04:20|| Front Page Top

#5 The direct link for anyone who can't see the embedded video above.

I don't know about insh'allah maintenance...if there's any equipment that can take it, it's Russian equipment. Especially a rock like the T-55.

Posted by gromky 2011-12-29 04:34|| 2011-12-29 04:34|| Front Page Top

#6 Given the lack of exterior damage, I am guessing a spark in the propellant of a round.

Posted by Anonymoose 2011-12-29 08:43|| 2011-12-29 08:43|| Front Page Top

#7 I wasn't going to comment, as it is hard to tell. Also a suspicious number of video cams going. But if a T-55 took a hit (say from an RPG-7) and it penetrated the crew area, anyone standing/sitting in the commander's hatch could be blown out and would look like a rag doll flying through the air. The body would be a bag of mush. The T-55 is simple, rugged, and hard on the crew. It is also likely a 'monkey'/export model, so simpler to maintain and more primitive than one used in the USSR.

Posted by Whiskey Mike 2011-12-29 08:46|| 2011-12-29 08:46|| Front Page Top

#8 RPGs must have the right shot to penetrate. A few degrees off 90 degrees and the shot could bounce, or hit and not penetrate. RPGs don't always penetrate the first time or even on the first hit. It has to be the right shot.

If you watch closely the blast knocks the loader's machine gun out of its mount. The vector of the blast from the detonation in a turret is entirely upward. Were it a side hit most of the blast would be contained inside the turret since the vector would be redirected inside the tank until it is expended.

The hull doesn't rock or sway from a side or rear hit, as you would expect it to.

My point was since the tank did not have an autoloader, a dumbass loader possibly forgot to set the loader's safety switch, or the floor was completing a circuit and the loader dropped a shell shorting the circuit, or as JM pointed out, a misfired round was ejected from the breech, then detonated.

Posted by badanov 2011-12-29 09:56|| http://www.freefirezone.org 2011-12-29 09:56|| Front Page Top

#9 Inverted foxhole.

Posted by Matt 2011-12-29 10:41|| 2011-12-29 10:41|| Front Page Top

#10 mixed evidence. The tank was rolled up to a berm so only the turret and gun showed, implying at least someone in the crew had some experience. On the other hand, the position would have made it hard for an AT hit anywhere but the turret and there's no hint of that in the video.

Posted by Mercutio 2011-12-29 11:29|| 2011-12-29 11:29|| Front Page Top

#11 Static electricity and old ammunition are a bad combination.

Also, as I remember it, the T-55 main gun ammo was a two piece round...first you load the shell and then you load the charge. IF the charge is old and deteriorated and more sensitive due to time, the static electricity that needs to be discharged with each round would have set the thing off.

Of course, the Russkies were not above selling bad ammo with their old equipment.

Posted by Bill Clinton 2011-12-29 11:52|| 2011-12-29 11:52|| Front Page Top

#12 I give the "flyer" a 3.7:
poor form, didn't stick the landing

Posted by Frank G 2011-12-29 12:01|| 2011-12-29 12:01|| Front Page Top

#13 Look at us! We got guns! We got TANKS!!!! Hey Achmed, be sure you get this on video. We can paste it on Facebook and show the world that we've got boom .....

Posted by lotp 2011-12-29 14:42|| 2011-12-29 14:42|| Front Page Top

#14 I didn't see or hear anything that sounded like a double-explosion or a hit-then-explosion. It just blew up.

Posted by gorb 2011-12-29 21:53|| 2011-12-29 21:53|| Front Page Top

#15 And it seemed to blow up about the time it should have been working with or firing another round. Probably ammo problems, in my uneducated opinion.

Posted by gorb 2011-12-29 21:54|| 2011-12-29 21:54|| Front Page Top

23:33 tipper
23:20 Thing From Snowy Mountain
23:19 Thing From Snowy Mountain
22:19 USN, Ret.
22:18 M. Murcek
22:15 Barbara
22:11 Bill Clinton
22:08 Bill Clinton
22:06 M. Murcek
22:06 Bill Clinton
22:03 gorb
22:02 trailing wife
21:59 gorb
21:58 gorb
21:55 trailing wife
21:55 gorb
21:54 gorb
21:53 gorb
21:51 gorb
21:48 JosephMendiola
21:46 Slomp Oppressor of the Faeries1490
21:44 Pappy
21:42 Uncle Phester
21:37 M. Murcek