Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 06/23/2010 View Tue 06/22/2010 View Mon 06/21/2010 View Sun 06/20/2010 View Sat 06/19/2010 View Fri 06/18/2010 View Thu 06/17/2010
1
2010-06-23 Home Front: Politix
Hoyer: Permanent middle class tax cuts too costly
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred 2010-06-23 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 I guess I'll be back to 32 hours by the fall.
Posted by badanov 2010-06-23 00:48|| http://www.freefirezone.org  2010-06-23 00:48|| Front Page Top

#2 Hoyer - how about the gov just spends less money on stupid stuff?
Posted by 3dc 2010-06-23 01:05||   2010-06-23 01:05|| Front Page Top

#3 If they cut all the stupid stuff - Congress would be vacant.

Not a bad idea.
Posted by CrazyFool 2010-06-23 01:18||   2010-06-23 01:18|| Front Page Top

#4 Yup, Can't allow the sheeple to keep any of OUR money, they'll spend it stupidly on food and clothing, Can't allow that, WE CONTROL WHERE IT GOES, NOT THE SHEEPLE.
(Sarc, as if the tag was needed)
But it's truth as well.
All money is theirs except the little we are allowed to use (Until they want it back)
Posted by Redneck Jim 2010-06-23 01:59||   2010-06-23 01:59|| Front Page Top

#5 How much you wanna bet that the Legacy Media is gonna spin this as "Our boyfriend really really wanted to keep those tax cuts, but the greedy Rethuglicans in Congress wouldn't let him!" when someone points out his campaign pledge to people making under 200-250k?

(Yeah, I know the Repubs don't control Congress, and this putz isn't a Repub either, but the average Oblahblah/Dem voter isn't smart enough to realize that....)
Posted by Cornsilk Blondie 2010-06-23 07:19||   2010-06-23 07:19|| Front Page Top

#6 Pull out a dollar bill, RJ (if you still have one): it says "United States of America" on it twice, but nowhere does it say "Redneck Jim." See - it IS their money, and not yours.
That said, the bills have to be paid, and payment can only come from those with either earning power or assets, through taxes or (and) inflation. Even if you vote out the current crowd their replacements will do the same thing.
Posted by Glenmore 2010-06-23 07:23||   2010-06-23 07:23|| Front Page Top

#7 The Middle Class is the biggest voting block and the one that is getting screwed the hardest with taxes, cost of living increases and health care expenses.

The dhimocrats really don't want to be in power past 2010-2012 if they try to pull this.
Posted by DarthVader 2010-06-23 07:47||   2010-06-23 07:47|| Front Page Top

#8 How about tax cuts and less spending? Makes their heads spin.
Posted by Spot  2010-06-23 08:29||   2010-06-23 08:29|| Front Page Top

#9 Good point Cornsilk - Remember that when the housing crisis hit the media laid it all on the 'evil Republincans' even though the Democrats had controlled both houses of congress for 2 years and block each and every attempt at reform.
Posted by CrazyFool 2010-06-23 08:30||   2010-06-23 08:30|| Front Page Top

#10 Hoyer: Democrats Permanent middle class tax cuts too costly
Posted by Procopius2k 2010-06-23 09:18||   2010-06-23 09:18|| Front Page Top

#11 Pull out a dollar bill, RJ (if you still have one): it says "United States of America" on it twice, but nowhere does it say "Redneck Jim." See - it IS their money, and not yours.

That's right. And, as Jesus said, "Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's."

It's just that Caesar really is spending too much money on stupid stuff. And besides that, Steny Hoyer is a pig who deserves to lose his job.
Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2010-06-23 12:32||   2010-06-23 12:32|| Front Page Top

#12 If the CEO of a company with a major cash flow issue and a catastrophic balance sheet problem went to his board and said that there was just no way to reduce the company's operating expenses, that CEO would be out on his ass and/or the company would be consulting bankruptcy counsel.

The federal government employs about 2 million civilian workers. While I have no doubt that that number includes many people who really give the country its money's worth, is every one of those 2 million employees mission critical? Would the nation survive without the services of the Second Assistant Undersecretary of State for Andorran Affairs? What would be lost if Nancy Pelosi had to fly coach? What exactly does the Department of the Interior do for a living and why does it need 67,000 employees to do it?

Because we're way past the point of having to distinguish between services that might be desirable and those that are truly essential.
Posted by Matt 2010-06-23 13:40||   2010-06-23 13:40|| Front Page Top

#13 How about taxing rent-seeking instead of working, investing, employing and saving?

Oh the whole idea is to make it easy for the rent-seeker politically connected class at the expense of those working, investing, employing or saving.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2010-06-23 19:13||   2010-06-23 19:13|| Front Page Top

00:05 JosephMendiola
23:55 JosephMendiola
23:50 JosephMendiola
23:49 JosephMendiola
23:42 JosephMendiola
23:41 junkiron
23:20 SteveS
23:16 Iblis
23:11 junkiron
23:02 Pappy
23:00 Pappy
22:59 Lone Ranger
22:41 DarthVader
22:36 junkiron
22:19 Frank G
22:12 Rex Mundi
22:11 ed
22:07 ed
21:53 chris
21:52 chris
21:51 chris
21:48 tu3031
21:46 Eric Jablow
21:46 chris









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com