Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 10/27/2009 View Mon 10/26/2009 View Sun 10/25/2009 View Sat 10/24/2009 View Fri 10/23/2009 View Thu 10/22/2009 View Wed 10/21/2009
1
2009-10-27 Afghanistan
That 'pesky' Inconvenient History
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Slainter Threresing5568 2009-10-27 03:18|| || Front Page|| [1 views ]  Top

#1 Art. 99. Misbehavior before the enemy

Any member of the armed forces who before or in the presence of the enemy—
(1) runs away;
(2) shamefully abandons, surrenders, or delivers up any command, unit, place, or military property which it is his duty to defend;
(3) through disobedience, neglect, or intentional misconduct endangers the safety of any such command, unit, place, or military property;
(4) casts away his arms or ammunition;
(5) is guilty of cowardly conduct;
(6) quits his place of duty to plunder or pillage;
(7) causes false alarms in any command, unit, or place under control of the armed forces;
(8) willfully fails to do his utmost to encounter, engage, capture, or destroy any enemy troops, combatants, vessels, aircraft, or any other thing, which it is his duty so to encounter, engage, capture, or destroy; or
(9) does not afford all practicable relief and assistance to any troops, combatants, vessels, or aircraft of the armed forces belonging to the United States or their allies when engaged in battle;

shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.


How about at least getting the law changed or enforce it.
Posted by Procopius2k 2009-10-27 09:24||   2009-10-27 09:24|| Front Page Top

#2 Motion to enforce:

Seconded.
Posted by logi_cal 2009-10-27 11:00||   2009-10-27 11:00|| Front Page Top

#3  That criticism gives more heat than light. Afghanistan has proven itself a natural breeding ground for Islamic terrorism -- the only armed foreigners Afghans will tolerate are jihadis from other countries. Al Qaeda and the Taliban are basically equivalent in that regard. Leaving Afghanistan to its own devices will generate more terrorism in the end. (The Malaya & the Philippine insurgencies radically differ from Afghanistan. There never was a question of those countries exporting their violence.) Doing as we are doing is generating more American and Afghan casualties while the Taliban is partly supported by diversion of American aid. Vastly stepping up American forces for many years into the future (i.e., colonization) is the only thing that might work, and the electorate won't support it -- an opinion the original article actually agrees with.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2009-10-27 12:35||   2009-10-27 12:35|| Front Page Top

#4 The President clearly has made a choice. Instead of adopting a strategy to advance or retreat, he is having them dance in place. It must feel like some kind of cruel torture to our troops there.
Posted by Richard of Oregon 2009-10-27 13:27||   2009-10-27 13:27|| Front Page Top

23:30 SteveS
23:27 Thing From Snowy Mountain
23:06 remoteman
22:44 Skunky Glins****
22:36 Skunky Glins****
22:26 JosephMendiola
22:23 Frank G
22:21 JosephMendiola
22:21 Skunky Glins****
22:16 JosephMendiola
22:13 notascrename
22:02 JosephMendiola
21:59 3dc
21:56 KBK
21:55 3dc
21:51 bman
21:50 trailing wife
21:49 3dc
21:47 3dc
21:35 regular joe
21:29 Richard Aubrey
21:29 trailing wife
21:27 Richard Aubrey
21:10 Rambler in Virginia









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com