Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 10/15/2009 View Wed 10/14/2009 View Tue 10/13/2009 View Mon 10/12/2009 View Sun 10/11/2009 View Sat 10/10/2009 View Fri 10/09/2009
1
2009-10-15 Home Front: Politix
Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British Lord
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2009-10-15 14:22|| || Front Page|| [5 views ]  Top

#1 Not at all surprising.
Posted by Besoeker in Duitsland 2009-10-15 14:55||   2009-10-15 14:55|| Front Page Top

#2 Sry, link appears to be broken
Posted by GirlThursday 2009-10-15 14:59||   2009-10-15 14:59|| Front Page Top

#3 Well I posted the right URL...
Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty, Claims British Lord
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2009-10-15 15:29||   2009-10-15 15:29|| Front Page Top

#4 His analysis is wrong. In American law, the Constitution always trumps treaties. To revoke a treaty that was confirmed by the Senate would only require an Act of Congress signed by the President.

While sovereignty is a major concern going forward, this is not a "hit the fan" moment.
Posted by Maggie Ebbuter2991 2009-10-15 17:27||   2009-10-15 17:27|| Front Page Top

#5 Maggie E, your take assumes that the Supreme Court agrees with you. There are some on the court, like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who believe that we should take foreign law into consideration in US cases. They would be happy to cede sovereignty to Europe.
Posted by Rambler in Virginia">Rambler in Virginia  2009-10-15 18:03||   2009-10-15 18:03|| Front Page Top

#6 Sovereignty rests SOLELY with the people. It cannot be given away, except by coup.
Posted by Bright Pebbles 2009-10-15 19:41||   2009-10-15 19:41|| Front Page Top

#7 Such a treaty would never be ratified in the first place. We'd toss out every last congressman and Senator and they know it. That is what happened with Kyoto.
Posted by rjschwarz 2009-10-15 19:59||   2009-10-15 19:59|| Front Page Top

#8 Given who the chief justice of the Supreme Court still is, I think Maggie Ebbuter2991 is still correct, Rambler.
Posted by trailing wife">trailing wife  2009-10-15 20:32||   2009-10-15 20:32|| Front Page Top

23:51 JosephMendiola
23:50 JosephMendiola
23:49 ed
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:31 trailing wife
23:28 trailing wife
23:24 USN, Ret.
23:21 USN, Ret.
22:48 USN, Ret.
21:52 rjschwarz
21:23 Pappy
20:50 phil_b
20:47 gorb
20:39 Procopius2k
20:39 Frank G
20:37 Frank G
20:33 gorb
20:32 trailing wife
20:29 ed
20:26 ed
20:11 ed
20:01 Procopius2k
19:59 rjschwarz
19:58 Nimble Spemble









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com