Article

2009-03-21 Home Front Economy

Bonusgate: Now AIG is suing the hand that feeds it

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2009-03-21 12:23|| || Front Page|| [8 views ] Top

#1 A very interesting article in the Washington Post about who is currently employed by AIG, and why they were given retention bonuses. Exerpt:

Who wants to hear a wealthy financier complain? And yet, within those walls off Danbury Road lies a deep sense of betrayal -- first by their former colleagues, now by their elected leaders.

The handful of souls who championed the firm's now-infamous credit-default swaps are, by nearly every account, long since departed. Those left behind to clean up the mess, the majority of whom never lost a dime for AIG, now feel they have been sold out by their Congress and their president. "They've chosen to throw us under the bus," said a Financial Products executive, one of several who spoke on condition of anonymity, fearing reprisals.

They say what is missing from this week's hysteria is perspective. The very handsome retention payments they received over the past week were set in motion early last year when the firm's former president, Joe Cassano, was on his way out the door. Financial Products was already running into trouble on its risky credit bets, and the year ahead looked grim. People were weighing offers from other firms, and AIG executives feared that too many departures could lead to disaster.

So AIG stepped in with an offer to employees of Financial Products. Work through all of 2008, and you'd get a lump payment in March 2009. Stick around through 2009, and you'll get paid through 2010. Almost all other forms of compensation -- bonuses, deferred payments and the like -- have vanished.

"People are trying to do the right thing," the same Financial Products executive said. "Guys have worked their [tails] off to try to get value for the taxpayer. This isn't money that's being advanced to us. People have performed the work and done it exactly as we asked them to do."

It would be impractical at best, dangerous at worst, to get rid of everyone at Financial Products. If everyone leaves, Pasciucco said, "you don't have people that really, truly understand the book [of business]. We're still big enough that that matters." If they did walk out the door, who would volunteer to work at the Chernobyl of the financial world? And what would become of the mammoth portfolio that remains? "It would become the biggest naked position on Wall Street," one longtime Financial Products executive said, "and everybody would exploit it."

lotp was right. I was wrong, and I apologize.

Posted by trailing wife 2009-03-21 17:36|| 2009-03-21 17:36|| Front Page Top

#2 No apology required, TW. It's understandable that people got hot about this.

Unfortunately, it served admirably to detract attention from the massive and horrific bill that passed the House at the end of the week. And by stirring up hatred and anger at 'the rich' it plays right into Obama's goals, I fear.

Posted by lotp 2009-03-21 19:12|| 2009-03-21 19:12|| Front Page Top

#3 Shouldn't the headline read: "Bone-Us-Gate?"

Posted by JohnQC 2009-03-21 19:13|| 2009-03-21 19:13|| Front Page Top

#4 No. That's the point of the article TW cites.

Posted by lotp 2009-03-21 19:53|| 2009-03-21 19:53|| Front Page Top

#5 If you've never been in a house that's collapsing, you really don't understand what is asked of those who remain to make sure it collapses gently. While no one's life is immediately threatened as with true first responders, it really makes a difference who sticks around and how motivated they are. And when you're talking billions of dollars, that makes a difference to widows and orphans, groups we've heard little about lately. Yet, when I started in banking, we often spoke of them and our responsibility to them. I fear those days are returning.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2009-03-21 19:57|| 2009-03-21 19:57|| Front Page Top

#6 Shouldn't the headline read: "Bone-Us-Gate?"

Shouldn't you be picking lint out of your navel?

If you aren't going to read the articles, then do the Burg a favor...

Posted by Pappy 2009-03-21 22:21|| 2009-03-21 22:21|| Front Page Top

23:56 Barbara Skolaut
23:48 Frank G
22:55 Seafarious
22:44 john frum
22:28 Bangkok Billy
22:26 Pappy
22:25 CrazyFool
22:24 Seafarious
22:21 Pappy
22:11 Barbara Skolaut
22:03 Barbara Skolaut
22:00 Red Dawg
21:56 Rambler in Virginia
21:55 Thing From Snowy Mountain
21:52 Rambler in Virginia
21:50 DoDo
21:33 whatadeal
21:08 DMFD
21:07 Chief
21:07 DMFD
21:06 Redneck Jim
20:56 phil_b
20:52 DMFD
20:51 Snolusing Trotsky3857