Article

2008-12-31 Home Front: Politix

Illinois Senate Seat Dispute May Head to Court

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2008-12-31 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views ] Top

#1 My reading of the Constitution is that the Senate doesn't have to seat Burris, but then I'm not one of the "best and the brightest" {spit}

Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2008-12-31 10:12|| 2008-12-31 10:12|| Front Page Top

#2 From the Constitution, Article I, Section 5. Each House shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its own members, ...

The Instapundit notes that this likely means that the Senate can only judge that the election/appointment was legitimate and that Burris is qualified since he's over age 30 and is an Illinois resident, and he cites a couple of USSC decisions.

Me: I think it means what it says, and that the USSC is in error: the Senate is the judge of the elections and qualifications of its members. If they find a problem with Burris' appointment they can refuse to seat him, and it isn't clear to me that the 'problem' they might find is limited to what's explicitly written in Section 5.

Later in Section 5 is this: Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.

Which to me means that if they really, really don't want Burris they can expel him. And the reasons for expulsion can be pretty much whatever they want said reasons to be.

Posted by Steve White 2008-12-31 10:24|| 2008-12-31 10:24|| Front Page Top

Posted by Sneting Trotsky1184 2008-12-31 12:25|| 2008-12-31 12:25|| Front Page Top

#4 A pretty good chess move by Blago.

1)He is the sitting Governor of Illinois, since the good citizens have managed to do zero about his little hickup(and won't)
2) The Illinois State Constitution gives sole authority to appoint replacements to a vacant US Senate seat to said governor, just like New Yawk.
3) The only thread Horseface Harry can pursue is that Burris is unqualified to serve. Ha! He's more qualifed than ole Harry hisownself.
4) If it goes to Fed. Court. it goes down in flames.
5) Blago wins again and is still around to cause more trouble for Bambirino. And will. Just like a big burr under your favorite saddle.

Posted by Woozle Elmeter 2700 2008-12-31 12:38|| 2008-12-31 12:38|| Front Page Top

#5 Forget Clinton, make The Blagonator Secretary of State. He'll have UN member nations paying us greens fees in no time at all. This guy has real talent!

Posted by Besoeker 2008-12-31 12:57|| 2008-12-31 12:57|| Front Page Top

#6 The Senate will lose on the issue of not seating Blago's appointment. It is a legal appointment. A reading of the constitution that would allow the Senate to decide who is allowed in would mean that if Norm Coleman were to win and the Dem. majority didn't like it, they could decide to keep him out and force Minnesota to give them someone they do like, e.g. Al Franken. That reading of the constitution would clearly take away the power of the electorate to decide who they want to represent them and of duly elected governors to make lawful appointments. It is also worth noting that when the constitution was written, senators were not elected. They are now. The Powell case will trump the Senate's desire to keep Burris out. The destinction between "elected" and legally "selected" will be one without a difference.

Posted by Sgt. D.T. 2008-12-31 13:39|| 2008-12-31 13:39|| Front Page Top

#7 Wish some "reporters" had the guts to ask (and keep asking) Mr. Burris how much he paid for the seat.

Burrus can deny it all he wants, but Blago's on ~~tape~~ record as intending to sell it.

So how much did you and/or your "friends" pay for this "honor," Mr. Burrus?

Posted by Barbara Skolaut">Barbara Skolaut 2008-12-31 14:21|| http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/]">[http://ariellestjohndesigns.com/] 2008-12-31 14:21|| Front Page Top

#8 Blago could have picked anyone. Picking a lawyer with lots of connections in the community wasn't such a bad choice. Might need one or two somewhere down the road.

Posted by Besoeker 2008-12-31 14:26|| 2008-12-31 14:26|| Front Page Top

#9 My inner minotrity_tr*oll is laffing.

Posted by .5MT 2008-12-31 16:10|| www.cybernations.net]">[www.cybernations.net] 2008-12-31 16:10|| Front Page Top

23:54 Chunky Shilet4394
23:52 qdllwkctf
23:33 Zhang Fei
23:23 Barbara Skolaut
23:20 Barbara Skolaut
23:18 Barbara Skolaut
23:09 Frank G
22:36 lotp
22:32 Pappy
22:27 OldSpook
22:26 OldSpook
22:13 A_Rovian_Desciple
21:59 A_Rovian_Desciple
21:54 tipover
21:28 Tom- Pa
21:27 bradeous
21:26 rammer
20:58 lotp
20:49 Tom- Pa
20:40 bradeous
20:39 Grunter
20:29 Poison Reverse
20:29 acaiberry
20:28 bradeous