Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sun 04/15/2007 View Sat 04/14/2007 View Fri 04/13/2007 View Thu 04/12/2007 View Wed 04/11/2007 View Tue 04/10/2007 View Mon 04/09/2007
1
2007-04-15 Afghanistan
Group: U.S. Marines Broke International Law
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Sherry 2007-04-15 00:57|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 broke international humanitarian law

a.k.a. "we're making this up, but your traitorous MSM will never check".
Posted by Procopius2k 2007-04-15 09:19||   2007-04-15 09:19|| Front Page Top

#2 My understanding was the Marine unit sprung an ambush, and then laid down covering fire as they withdrew. SOP.

These guys have their asses on the line, so it sucks to be an Afghani when an armed, hostile enemy chooses the place of battle.

The Marines followed the rules which are in fact black letter international law.

I just hope the Marine that did get hit recovers fully.
Posted by badanov 2007-04-15 10:12|| http://www.freefirezone.org]">[http://www.freefirezone.org]  2007-04-15 10:12|| Front Page Top

#3  But if the Talibunnies are going to hide amongst the civvies, we have a tough choice to make, and we can't second guess the men making those decisions.

Whole article is a lie. Internaytional law 'ie Geneva Convetions) is quite clear: if you hide between civilians you arte a war criminal and enemy may execute you. Also you not ennemy are guilty of victims caused by ennemy's retaliatory fire. And it tells nothing about enemy fighting with an arm tied behind his back (self imposed retrictions becaise those populations are own or ally thta is not international law).

The people who made Geneva Conventions knew well that if violating tghem broughtt a benefit they would never be enforced and thuis would fail to reach their goal, that is why they provided for them not protecting those who cheat so if you do it you only made thibngs more unpleasant for everyone but get no benefit.

Article should be retitled: "Taliban broke international law, journalists helped them".
Posted by JFM">JFM  2007-04-15 11:05||   2007-04-15 11:05|| Front Page Top

#4 not too mention your attackers dress like the locals and ever fuckin one in that country 2 years of age and over carry an AK-47
Posted by sinse 2007-04-15 11:06||   2007-04-15 11:06|| Front Page Top

#5 Missed a few, there should be no one left to complain.
Posted by Redneck Jim 2007-04-15 11:19||   2007-04-15 11:19|| Front Page Top

#6 Oh no! Not the super duper "international humanitarian" law
Posted by Captain America 2007-04-15 11:27||   2007-04-15 11:27|| Front Page Top

#7 Or were the complainers even there?
Posted by Redneck Jim 2007-04-15 11:28||   2007-04-15 11:28|| Front Page Top

#8 Man, JFM, your typing goes to hell when your pissed off.
Posted by wxjames 2007-04-15 14:21||   2007-04-15 14:21|| Front Page Top

#9 So does you'res.
Posted by Omoluling McCoy4091 2007-04-15 14:57||   2007-04-15 14:57|| Front Page Top

#10 I've read a more detailed report. I respect our armed forces but these spec ops marines shot at everything in sight. That is why the whole group is pulled out of afghansitan and only those individials involved are remaining for a hearing. They shot up everyone who was cutting grass around the river and quite a few civilians driving down the road. I have no problem if they were ambushed and returned fire, but there was small arms fire only and they destroyed everything within 10 miles. If they were innocent, you'll hear there story, otherwise this doesn't look good for these guys.
Posted by Injun Slating9349 2007-04-15 15:21||   2007-04-15 15:21|| Front Page Top

#11 WTF is "international law"?
Posted by twobyfour 2007-04-15 15:24||   2007-04-15 15:24|| Front Page Top

#12 i agree 2x4
Posted by sinse 2007-04-15 16:14||   2007-04-15 16:14|| Front Page Top

#13 but there was small arms fire only and they destroyed everything within 10 miles. If they were innocent, you'll hear there story, otherwise this doesn't look good for these guys

Guess you either have a hard time reading or you didn't get the memo.

Black letter law: The enemy chose the time and place to attack, and the Marines covered their withdrawal with small arms fire.

The enemy is responsible for the civilian deaths.

I am more concerned for our people in the field than I will ever be for our armed and hostile enemy.
Posted by badanov 2007-04-15 16:24|| http://www.freefirezone.org]">[http://www.freefirezone.org]  2007-04-15 16:24|| Front Page Top

#14 I'm glad they made it out of alive but good training and good intel would have avoided this.

The Marines SF are a new group and excellent in tactics where you can do this kind of stuff in enemy terrority during expeditionary mission during an ambush.

But now someone's 18 yr old bride, 1 yr old kid, and multiple over 90 yr old grandfathers are all over the highway. Of course they destroyed the journelists photographs because they would of been trouble. A face saving move.

Like I said, proper training and intel next time for ANY special forces brance will avoid this.
Posted by Injun Slating9349 2007-04-15 16:34||   2007-04-15 16:34|| Front Page Top

#15 2x4:
If the President negotiates a treaty with a foreign and 2/3 the Senate ratifies it, that's international law. Nothing else is, no matter what they claim. So yes, we could commit war crimes, but as JFM noted, it was the "brave patriots and minutemen" who were the criminals.
Posted by Jackal">Jackal  2007-04-15 16:39|| http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]">[http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2007-04-15 16:39|| Front Page Top

#16 If the President negotiates a treaty with a foreign and 2/3 the Senate ratifies it, that's international law.

unlike the "Kyoto treaty" - which doesn't comply, but the Global Warming/Climate Change advocates pretends didn't suffer a CRUSHING defeat when actually voted on...
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-04-15 17:48||   2007-04-15 17:48|| Front Page Top

#17 I'm glad they made it out of alive but good training and good intel would have avoided this.

And addressing the deficits in those areas go straight to the top.
Posted by badanov 2007-04-15 17:54|| http://www.freefirezone.org]">[http://www.freefirezone.org]  2007-04-15 17:54|| Front Page Top

#18 I am sorry IS9349, but it is a warzone and if I was there and somebody started shooting at me, I am letting go with everything I got. I will not die because someone wants to play a pc f*cking war.
Posted by djohn66 2007-04-15 17:57||   2007-04-15 17:57|| Front Page Top

#19 Also law is what elected represntatives have voted. No represntation no law I am ready to accept.

For resolutions voted by that organism who was headed by a person complice in the Rwandan genocide and who represents pĂȘople as despicable as mad man Kim Il Sung, Mugabe, the "King" of Arabia, tedrrorist Assad, the Mad Mllahs, Chirac, Zapatero, chief genocider of Sudan, a couple decades ago canibal Idi Amin Dada well such resolutions are not law, are not binding and I will not tell what they can do with them because there are ladies who read this blog.

Dissolve the UN now!
Posted by JFM">JFM  2007-04-15 18:01||   2007-04-15 18:01|| Front Page Top

#20 there was small arms fire only and they destroyed everything within 10 miles.

Ima love a happy ending. SF yawls.
Posted by Shipman">Shipman  2007-04-15 18:26||   2007-04-15 18:26|| Front Page Top

#21 Think you need stricter ROE's Injun? Intel goes out the window when the lions of islam hide behind the ladies and shoot at you. But excessive force isn't excessive in a hot retreat. Badanov #13 nails it.
Posted by One Eyed Shuper7586 2007-04-15 18:29||   2007-04-15 18:29|| Front Page Top

#22 I'm with Badanov on that - stay alive - the bad guys created the dead people by their willingness to hide/shield among them. GC's recognize that..the MSM won't
Posted by Frank G">Frank G  2007-04-15 19:09||   2007-04-15 19:09|| Front Page Top

#23 What is "international humanitarian law"? I, for one, think it would be a better world if the ones shot up were lawyers and their fellow travellers. Lawyers are only needed to protect you from other lawyers. They are a predatory, parasitic breed that needs to be treated as varmints.
Posted by Random Thoughts 2007-04-15 20:10||   2007-04-15 20:10|| Front Page Top

#24 I respect our armed forces but these spec ops marines shot at everything in sight. ... They shot up everyone who was cutting grass around the river and quite a few civilians driving down the road.

Which was the smart thing to do. So long as the Afghani people do not begin capping Taliban fighters who roam around in civilian garb, they are going to suffer right along with them. While mainstream media cheerfully ignores how Taleban fighters endanger civilians, it is the Afghanis who must purchase a clue.

If they allow civilian garbed Taliban free passage, then the whole population becomes targets. How is it that the Coalition must do all the heavy lifting while the Afghanis shrug off any responsibility for securing their nation from its previous tyrants? If these opportunist civilian assholes refuse to accept some portion of the duties involved, then they start to become Taliban accomplices. Maybe when more of them end up dead for their inaction they will do something about it. Until then, our troops have the right to do whatever it takes to assure their safety as they go about doing Afghanistan's dirty work for them.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-04-15 20:45||   2007-04-15 20:45|| Front Page Top

#25 But now someone's 18 yr old bride, 1 yr old kid, and multiple over 90 yr old grandfathers are all over the highway.

You left out the baby ducks, fluffy bunnies and little Hadji in his homemade wheelchair, anonymous one.
Posted by Pappy 2007-04-15 20:48||   2007-04-15 20:48|| Front Page Top

#26 Marines Special Forces can shoot and hit things ten miles away? I am quite impressed. As for the rest, I'm not at all qualified to have an opinion.
Posted by trailing wife 2007-04-15 23:21||   2007-04-15 23:21|| Front Page Top

23:51 Zenster
23:44  KBK
23:25 WTF
23:24 Skidmark
23:23 Zenster
23:21 trailing wife
23:12 trailing wife
23:09 anonymous2u
22:49 Zenster
22:31 phil_b
22:26 Barbara Skolaut
22:24 Jackal
22:22 3dc
21:59 FOTSGreg
21:56 Frank G
21:54 Zenster
21:45 Zenster
21:44 Elmer Fudd
21:41 Eric Jablow
21:39 Eric Jablow
21:38 Jules
21:36 Procopius2k
21:36 Eric Jablow
21:36 Zenster









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com