Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 03/15/2007 View Wed 03/14/2007 View Tue 03/13/2007 View Mon 03/12/2007 View Sat 03/10/2007 View Fri 03/09/2007 View Thu 03/08/2007
1
2007-03-15 Home Front: Culture Wars
CAIR looking to sue passengers who reported imams
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by DarthVader 2007-03-15 11:04|| || Front Page|| [11138 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Every Clinton appointed federal judge in the country is just burning to get this case in front of themself.
Posted by bigjim-ky 2007-03-15 12:42||   2007-03-15 12:42|| Front Page Top

#2 This is a double post. Be sure to see this Rantburg post.
Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418 2007-03-15 13:22||   2007-03-15 13:22|| Front Page Top

#3 It wasn't CAIR that filed the lawsuit. It was a licensed attorney in NYC who happens to be:
1. President of the NY State chapter of CAIR
2. An appointee of the current mayor of NYC
Posted by mhw 2007-03-15 14:26|| http://hypocrisy-incorporated.blogspot.com/]">[http://hypocrisy-incorporated.blogspot.com/]  2007-03-15 14:26|| Front Page Top

#4 Typical. Muslim terrorist suing their victims. We can only hope the "John Does" counter sue their towels off.

These are the scum that funding cop killing supporter Congressmen Keith Ellison.
Posted by Icerigger 2007-03-15 14:40||   2007-03-15 14:40|| Front Page Top

#5 Why do we never hear anything about how the woman who speaks Arabic overhead these treacherous bastids making anti-American comments? While it is a common ploy to restrict all caustic rhetoric to a lesser known language, these maggots were nailed dead-on for making comments that should alarm any other Arabic speaking passenger. Well, at least the non-Muslim ones, that is.

As to the lawsuit, we can only hope that CAIR is slapped down hard and fast with this blatant piece of legal intimidation. "John Doe" was most certainly excercising the right to free speech when he notified security of his own concerns. The airline should steadfastly refuse to reveal any passenger names from the flight list for fear that violent reprisals might occur against them. Goodness knows when some otherwise sweetness and light-filled Muslim will randomly decide to develop a case of Sudden Jihad Syndrome in close proximity these "John Does".

Is it just me or does all of this downstream froth simply reek of complete and total orchestration from day one? CAIR has been proven to be complicit in terrorist activities. Isn't it long past tea for banning their organization from the United States?
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-03-15 15:01||   2007-03-15 15:01|| Front Page Top

#6 It's not just you, Zenster, this has smelt fishy from the very first. We are in the first stages of an attack on our Constitution and therefore our freedoms via the legal system. Look for more.
Posted by Deacon Blues 2007-03-15 15:14||   2007-03-15 15:14|| Front Page Top

#7 They are trying to use the American justice system to promote their jihad agendas, and also to gain some control of the system after testing it, as in this case--"What will the American people tolerate so far a lawsuits go?" and "What can we gain?" and "How can we use this for our propganda to promote Islam?" Bascially they're wanting to be treated specially as a class of people. The trend has worked for others and serves to place them within the taboo of unquestioned acceptance because they've been so "unfairly" treated. This status allows them more maneuvering room.
Posted by ex-lib 2007-03-15 15:20||   2007-03-15 15:20|| Front Page Top

#8 I for one await the discovery process. Let us not forget the Local news did a segment on these Imams. One was caught on tape saying they did not change seats. They did not ask for seatbelt extenders. Most importantly that they had just come from a conference on "how to minipulate the media"
Posted by xyz 2007-03-15 15:28||   2007-03-15 15:28|| Front Page Top

#9 I grow frustrated. Its nearing time to just string them up!
Posted by 3dc 2007-03-15 15:44||   2007-03-15 15:44|| Front Page Top

#10 This is a probe, just like all the other ways the jihadis probe our defenses. These are attacks just like IEDs and insurgants, and should be treated the same by the US Government.
Posted by Alaska Paul">Alaska Paul  2007-03-15 16:39||   2007-03-15 16:39|| Front Page Top

#11  I grow frustrated. Its nearing time to just string them up!

There is a way to deal with this Lawfare crap. Run the scumbag Lawyers to ground and gut them like catfish. The tipping point is approaching, I for one, and a number of my acquaintances have just about had it. I know a number of folks that used to identify with a more liberal stance that have just about completed the transformation to conservativism, and they're livid too.

This getting to be way to much. It is also true that this is part of the process and game plan the muzzies employ where ever they go. We need to give it to them and their supporters hard, right between the ribs.
Posted by Chiper Threreger8956 2007-03-15 16:53||   2007-03-15 16:53|| Front Page Top

#12 c.f. Fed. Rule Civ. Pro. rule 11 sanctions.
Posted by Mark E. 2007-03-15 17:22||   2007-03-15 17:22|| Front Page Top

#13 Arm yourselves. If you don't, very likely in a few years you'll wish you had.
Posted by Dave D.">Dave D.  2007-03-15 17:49||   2007-03-15 17:49|| Front Page Top

#14 The counter suit should be a RICO suit against CAIR, as it can clearly be demonstrated that they act on behalf of criminal and designated terrorist organizations.

RICO allows for triple damages.
Posted by Anonymoose 2007-03-15 18:02||   2007-03-15 18:02|| Front Page Top

#15 Arm yourselves. If you don't, very likely in a few years you'll wish you had.

Someone once said that, "Cynicism is a word optimists created to describe realists."

As an optimist who is earnestly grappling with the dire portents of our current reality, permit me to add something to David D.'s salient observation.

It has been said elsewhere that once society breaks down, the streets will be littered with guns. Guns that are no longer of any use because their owners ran out of ammunition. Anyone who is genuinely serious about protecting their loved ones during the ever-more-likely onslaught to come had best learn how to reload and build fresh ammunition as well. Just sayin'.
Posted by Zenster">Zenster  2007-03-15 18:27||   2007-03-15 18:27|| Front Page Top

#16 As for me, in a SHTF situation I'll probably run out of Fixodent long before I run out of ammo, whether I hand-load or not...
Posted by Dave D.">Dave D.  2007-03-15 19:56||   2007-03-15 19:56|| Front Page Top

#17 Some Clinton-appointed judge will wreck the lives of the John Does and meanwhile the vast left-wing conspiracy whose initials are MSM will give it page 39 treatment. But that's preferable to page 1, because page 1 will scare so many travelers that no one will even report a burning shoe fuse.
Posted by Darrell 2007-03-15 20:17||   2007-03-15 20:17|| Front Page Top

#18 How about a pre-emptive strike on Clinton appointed judges ?
Posted by wxjames 2007-03-15 20:25||   2007-03-15 20:25|| Front Page Top

#19 Time to remember that the constitution is a living, evolving thing.
Posted by gromgoru 2007-03-15 23:19||   2007-03-15 23:19|| Front Page Top

23:52 anonaminie
23:52 Bunyip
23:28 Eric Jablow
23:25 Verlaine
23:24 gromgoru
23:23 Verlaine
23:19 gromgoru
23:18 Verlaine
23:18 Frank G
23:10 Verlaine
23:07 RD
23:07 anon1
23:04 Verlaine
23:01 twobyfour
22:58 anon1
22:57 Alaska Paul
22:56 Danking70
22:55 Verlaine
22:37 Zenster
22:35 twobyfour
22:35 anon1
22:35 Chuck Simmins
22:32 anon1
22:18 gromgoru









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com