Article

2007-01-30 -Signs, Portents, and the Weather-

Two New Books Confirm Global Warming Is Natural

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Jonathan 2007-01-30 11:08|| || Front Page|| [11129 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Two New Books Confirm Global Warming Is Natural

Has Olympia Snowe (R-Ino) threatened the publishers yet?

Posted by xbalanke 2007-01-30 13:22|| 2007-01-30 13:22|| Front Page Top

#2 It notes that global climate models cant accurately register cloud effects.

The models were made for long (long in weather terms, 20daysish) term forecasting. The fact that "researchers" are using them for century long studies is ridiculous and laughable and dangerous. The data coming out is only as good and the data that went into the programming. We really don't have much of an idea on how upper atmospheric weather works. Combine that with solar cycles, unpredictable El Nino effects, butterfly farts, etc. and we have a very limited and flawed view of the planet's weather. Thus, the very limited and flawed data coming out of the computer models.

Sad that this has been hijacked by the anti-capitalist forces to try another way to make their view of the world forced on everybody else. Kinda like, "Its for the Children" mantra of others.

Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader 2007-01-30 13:31|| 2007-01-30 13:31|| Front Page Top

#3 Nice try, but you can't prove that either.

Posted by mojo">mojo 2007-01-30 13:51|| 2007-01-30 13:51|| Front Page Top

#4 Of course the Stupid Party, at the Congressional testimony, won't put any of these guys or Bjorn Stromberg on the list to testify.

Posted by anonymous2u 2007-01-30 13:57|| 2007-01-30 13:57|| Front Page Top

#5 "The models were made for long (long in weather terms, 20daysish) term forecasting. The fact that "researchers" are using them for century long studies is ridiculous and laughable and dangerous. The data coming out is only as good and the data that went into the programming. We really don't have much of an idea on how upper atmospheric weather works. Combine that with solar cycles, unpredictable El Nino effects, butterfly farts, etc. and we have a very limited and flawed view of the planet's weather. Thus, the very limited and flawed data coming out of the computer models. "

We dont have perfect info, so lets chance a catastrophe. I sure hope youre not making policy on Iranian nukes.

Posted by liberalhawk 2007-01-30 14:45|| 2007-01-30 14:45|| Front Page Top

#6 So you are saying you would rather listen to a bunch of people with the sole interest in crippling America's economy without any evidence that humans are responsible?

And who the hell are you listening to about Iran's nukes? The IAEA? Sounds like you are getting bum information from two questionable sources.

Posted by DarthVader">DarthVader 2007-01-30 15:18|| 2007-01-30 15:18|| Front Page Top

#7 So is it gonna snow next week at TLH or not? Ima have yoofs that want to know.

Posted by Shipman 2007-01-30 15:57|| 2007-01-30 15:57|| Front Page Top

#8 The Chilling Stars: A New Theory of Climate Change, by Danish physicist Henrik Svensmark and former BBC science writer Nigel Calder

Poor Mr. Calder's social life has no doubt shrunk greatly now that his old colleagues are snubbing him.

Posted by trailing wife 2007-01-30 21:17|| 2007-01-30 21:17|| Front Page Top

#9 But, THE POLAR CAPS ARE MELTING!!! On Mars - damn that George Bush.

Posted by DMFD 2007-01-30 21:37|| 2007-01-30 21:37|| Front Page Top

23:24 SteveS
23:19 Gloque Elmang4914
23:15 Gloque Elmang4914
23:14 Eric Jablow
23:06 DMFD
23:06 Gloque Elmang4914
22:46 CrazyFool
22:45 Keystone
22:33 CrazyFool
22:29 CrazyFool
22:24 Mike N.
22:14 Shieldwolf
22:11 Shieldwolf
22:07 Anonymoose
22:05 PlanetDan
22:05 Shieldwolf
22:05 Anonymoose
22:04 Shieldwolf
21:55 Shieldwolf
21:44 DMFD
21:43 Asymmetrical T
21:42 DMFD
21:38 Pappy
21:37 DMFD