Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 01/11/2007 View Wed 01/10/2007 View Tue 01/09/2007 View Mon 01/08/2007 View Sun 01/07/2007 View Sat 01/06/2007 View Fri 01/05/2007
1
2007-01-11 Home Front: WoT
Ledeen: The Surge and its Critics
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Brett 2007-01-11 00:00|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 The pop-left's script for this will be based on the leftist response to the 1970 invasion of Cambodia. In what passes for their minds, this is an analogous situation---- the defeated imperialists lashing out in a last desperate attempt to retrieve the situation.

Actual campus riots, as opposed to choreographed hate-festivals, are less likely now that the ex-hippies run the campuses but the urge to follow a counterculture meme is very powerful among the conformist masses, roughly equivalent to a rodent mating impulse.
If acted upon faithfully enough, this script might even lead to a twenty-first century version of Kent State, hundreds of them with any luck.
Posted by Atomic Conspiracy 2007-01-11 07:29|| http://www.nuclearspace.com]">[http://www.nuclearspace.com]  2007-01-11 07:29|| Front Page Top

#2 The problem here is one of terms and of public relations. What Bush proposes sounds like (and in fact is) a military offensive. Surge sounds an awful lot like hurl to me with all the charms attributed thereto.

The surge terms gives Bush's snooty political enemies ( AKA The American Left ) a chance to trivialize this critical moment in the Iraq War, and thus to ignore it in favor of agenda. These folks live for verbal slip ups from their enemies jsut so they can trivialize it and advance their own barbaric ideas.

For me on a very, very personal level, I do not believe we have properly instructed the masses that in a war the only acceptable casualties are the enemy's and that when your representative supports a war it must be until victory is achieved, or that representative must vote against the war; that turning against the war for humanitarian reasons just makes your representative sound like a huckster, unworthy to participate in a republic.

Another thing Bush has failed to do is to simplify the requirement of the Iraq war. Allow me:

Our presense in Iraq is a strategic block against the ambitions of a hostile armed foreign power, if nothing else, and that by leaving we are conceding the field to that enemy, and that those who insist we do so value agenda rather than our nation's interests and those people who value agenda over all must be removed from power.
Posted by badanov 2007-01-11 09:44|| http://www.freefirezone.org]">[http://www.freefirezone.org]  2007-01-11 09:44|| Front Page Top

#3 Damn you got it AC. Maybe this time as farce tho?
Posted by Shipman 2007-01-11 11:54||   2007-01-11 11:54|| Front Page Top

#4 Ooopppps, I mean look at,
Cindy viz Jane
Kennedy viz Kennedy
Bobby Seale viz Al Sharpton
Posted by Shipman 2007-01-11 11:56||   2007-01-11 11:56|| Front Page Top

23:41 CrazyFool
23:37 JosephMendiola
23:35 Eric Jablow
23:32 Barbara Skolaut
23:21 JosephMendiola
23:18 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:16 Eric Jablow
23:14 Eric Jablow
23:12 Swamp Blondie
23:10 JosephMendiola
23:04 Mahmood
23:02 3dc
23:02 JosephMendiola
23:00 Old Patriot
22:56 Mahmood
22:54 DMFD
22:44 DMFD
22:27 JosephMendiola
22:15 JosephMendiola
22:04 gromgoru
22:00 Chuck Darwin
21:55 gromgoru
21:48 gromgoru
21:47 Verlaine









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com