Article

2006-11-11 Israel-Palestine-Jordan

Gays: Israelis Protest while Paleos Beat Up and Threaten Beheadings

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by PlanetDan 2006-11-11 09:45|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Remember the Lavender Panthers? Those were CA gays who took martial arts, with the idea of thumping those who wanted to thump them.

While it is hard to find individuals with a talent for martial arts, if you go looking, you can easily find talented individuals who are martial artists you can rent.

This is what they should have done. I'm sure they could find any number of martial artists to accompany them, given the opportunity to give some violent individual a royal thumping.

They could even go out trolling for homosexual haters, who would attack them on the street, thinking they were easy prey, when all of a sudden some Sonny Chiba appears and just beats seven bells out of them.

You have to admit it would be funny as hell to hear in the same sentence:

"Die, you filthy homosexual swine...Hey! Quit hitting me! Ow! I'm being oppressed!"

Posted by Anonymoose 2006-11-11 10:53|| 2006-11-11 10:53|| Front Page Top

#2 Not surprising, gay activists are involved in the whole "pro-paleostinian" scam, yet homosexuals are persecuted in "paleostine" and often become refugees in Israel.

As a sidenote, it must be noted this gay pride was an "activist" one, IE it was held in Jerusalem in order to provoke the religious jews, purely and simply; gay prides in Tel Aviv do not cause any controversy.

Anyway, while I certainly favor individual freedom including sexual orientations, I'm really uneasy about the "gay rights" thing; IMHO, yet an another tool used by leftist a assorted subversives, a fact clearly visible in France with the totally anti-catholic stance of the act up crowd, and the communautarism and differentialism agenda it promotes.
I have no problem with homosexuals, but am really fed up with gays.

Posted by anonymous5089 2006-11-11 11:00|| 2006-11-11 11:00|| Front Page Top

#3 The march had been called off after threats by religious and right-wing opponents to mount huge counterdemonstrations

Apparently the SF crowd decided to drop the "disenfranchised youth" label and switch to "right wing opponents" instead. What exactly does that mean, "right wing opponents"? I've noticed this ridiculous description in more than one paper.

But of course! We all know how those "right-wing" Jews and "right-wing" Christians all go around beating up homosexuals on Friday night.

Not excusing anything, but sometimes you just set yourself up for trouble that you won't be able to handle on down the road.

Posted by anon 2006-11-11 11:45|| 2006-11-11 11:45|| Front Page Top

#4 I will say in behalf of homosexuals that they are one of the most obvious groups actively challenging Sharia Law and religious persecution from both Orthodox Jews and even Hindu nationalists.

By doing this they indirectly challenge all sorts of oppression, especially of women. Beliefs that are both so brutal and backwards that dare I say, even socialism looks like an improvement. Liberal democracy looks like paradise compared to that.

Most Islamic countries have a delicate balancing act between their civil law, and the whim of Sharia, that inserts itself to oppress whenever it feels like it. This comfy hypocricy needs to be shaken until it is broken.

And since it is homosexuals doing most of the shaking, then they are the ones who deserve at least tacit support, at least until somebody else challenges "the system".

Posted by Anonymoose 2006-11-11 12:44|| 2006-11-11 12:44|| Front Page Top

#5 I agree about homosexuals living in muslim or even hindu societies, or to a point, to those in Russia. But I still think those living in the West and reaping the benefits of western liberal democracies tend to gravitate toward Ye Olde subversion of the White Male Order, even if it means allying themselves with people who actually oprress homos at home.
There can be some exception, I recall a small demonstration by the french act up in front of the iranian embassy to protest hangings of homosexuals, but most of the time, it is the usual stuff, barge into the Nôtre-Dame cathedral to celebrate a mock same sex marriage (with of course tv invited), disturb the mass, punch a priest,...

IE silence on the fact the bulk of the violent hate-crimes against "gays" are comitted by... Youths, but full assault on the horrible straight "square" who must be culpabilized for his "bigoted opinions".

Did you know that in 2006 France a Mp was heavily fined for a speech at the pulpit of the parliament (MP are supposedly immune, but he repeated the incriminated sentence in a press conference, at the request of a "fellow traveller" journalist)?
Yet, he just said heterosexuality is superior to homosexuality in that sense that homosexuality cannot perpetuate a Nation, as it is unable to give life (this was more circonvulated, the guy is a catholic philosophy teacher)...
But there's a recent anti-homophobia law (based on an hoax, an attempted suicide by self-immolation who was turned into an exemplary hate crime which demanded an immediate response by the law), so "gay rights" NGOs sued him for "hate speech" and won.

Posted by anonymous5089 2006-11-11 13:06|| 2006-11-11 13:06|| Front Page Top

#6 Anonymoose, yea, all those gays for paleostinians groups, they challenge the shariat system, allrighty then.

Posted by twobyfour 2006-11-11 13:25|| 2006-11-11 13:25|| Front Page Top

#7 A parade there is a very unwise move. "Pride" parades are un-needed period. Keep your bedroom in the bedroom and most people will just not care.

Posted by closedanger@hotmail.com">closedanger@hotmail.com 2006-11-11 14:48|| 2006-11-11 14:48|| Front Page Top

#8 IE silence on the fact the bulk of the violent hate-crimes against "gays" are comitted by... Youths, but full assault on the horrible straight "square" who must be culpabilized for his "bigoted opinions".

Liberties for homosexuals are based on the ideals of tolerance that came from 2,000 years of those who were willing to learn to love their neighbor - not those who attempt to shove their own lifestyle on others. Values of tolerance that seem in short supply to many in the homosexual activist community. Notice I said activist, please. The vile spewed towards conservative "fundies" on Kos and other sites far exceeds anything you will find on Christian or other religious websites (excepting Islam) about homosexuals.

And yes - they do attempt to shove their lifestyle on us when they demand we pay for their marriage benefits and accept that a family is just who happens to be currently living under one roof.

I don't care if people are homosexual. I really don't care what anyone else does as long as it doesn't affect me. Homosexuals took it past the point of saying, don't discriminate against me to demanding we change the rules of society for them. In the process, they are breaking down the idea that a family is a biological unit. I don't really have a problem with homosexual families to be sure. But I do have a problem with supporting anyone and everyone - homosexual or not - who wants to form an arrangement, temporary or permanent, and slap the label of family on it.

We as a society accept the concept that children want to be with their genetic parents. Every adopted child seeks to find who their genetic parents are. Thus - there is something deeper to the concept of family than just a document in a courthouse.

Posted by anon 2006-11-11 15:44|| 2006-11-11 15:44|| Front Page Top

#9 and anyone who wants to come back and talk about the rights of divorced couples - I would like to remind you that my point still remains valid. While it is not true in every case, our courts, liberal and conservative, uphold the ideal that the biological parent has rights to be a part of their childs future, unless they are negligent to the point of having that privlidge revoked. My point is not to get into bickering over what makes the ideal family - but to point out that many of us don't want to conduct a social experiment undoing what has been, until about 1960, a fact of human nature.

Posted by anon 2006-11-11 15:59|| 2006-11-11 15:59|| Front Page Top

17:23 Frank G
23:44 SteveS
23:37 gorb
23:33 Red Lief
23:26 SR-71
23:21 trailing wife
23:20 Red Lief
23:18 trailing wife
23:15 gorb
23:09 trailing wife
23:06 Atomic Conspiracy
23:02 Bangkok Billy
23:00 Old Patriot
22:58 .com
22:46 Sgt. Mom
22:44 kilowattkid
22:44 mrp
22:39 kilowattkid
22:30 Zenster
22:26 Zenster
22:25 Frank G
22:23 Frank G
22:18 Frank G
22:18 Zenster