Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 10/24/2006 View Mon 10/23/2006 View Sun 10/22/2006 View Sat 10/21/2006 View Fri 10/20/2006 View Thu 10/19/2006 View Wed 10/18/2006
1
2006-10-24 Home Front: WoT
Snow says question on officers' prison time 'nonsensical'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by anonymous5089 2006-10-24 10:53|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 The question may be "nonsensical" but it better be answered damn quick. Seems in the view of many in our judicial system, the only people that don't have rights are ordinary American citizen that pay taxes and obey the law. Perhaps, from a career perspective, the mistake the Border Patrol agents made was in wounding the perp. Sentences like this will lead some to adopt the same policy to dangerous illegals that California property owners have to "endangered species" they find on their land, shoot them quick and bury them deep.
Posted by RWV 2006-10-24 11:10||   2006-10-24 11:10|| Front Page Top

#2 Wake up, Tony!
Posted by Phineter Thraviger1073 2006-10-24 11:48||   2006-10-24 11:48|| Front Page Top

#3 The Border Agents' failing was too little time at the practice range.
Posted by Glenmore">Glenmore  2006-10-24 13:05||   2006-10-24 13:05|| Front Page Top

#4 Actually, this case should be under appeal, and as such, neither Bush nor his representatives should be commenting on it, since an appellate victory is far more valuable long term (setting legal precedent etc.) than a pardon.
Posted by Glenmore">Glenmore  2006-10-24 13:13||   2006-10-24 13:13|| Front Page Top

#5 Mr. Ramos and his lawyer were on TV indicating an appeal was filed. Seems three of the jurors were told by the foreman they could not vote acquital if it would mean a hung jury.
Posted by Phineter Thraviger1073 2006-10-24 13:26||   2006-10-24 13:26|| Front Page Top

#6 Sounds like an easy appeal...if the foreman gave incorrect, or misleading instructions.

Obviously they (apparently) covered up evidence. That is grounds for removal. However, to say "question on officers' prison time 'nonsensical'" is, nonsensical. A conviction on the covering up evidence, and probation...unless I am really missing something here.
Posted by anymouse">anymouse  2006-10-24 19:31||   2006-10-24 19:31|| Front Page Top

21:13 Hupailing Ebbuns2352
18:27 Anonymoose
23:55 NoBeards
23:53 Thoth
23:53 Zenster
23:50 Papa Smurf
23:48 NoBeards
23:46 Thoth
23:46 Zenster
23:44 Zenster
23:43 Papa Smurf
23:42 NoBeards
23:39 Papa Smurf
23:39 Zenster
23:39 Jules
23:34 NoBeards
23:33 Kalle (kafir forever)
23:32 Anguper Hupomosing9418
23:32 Zenster
23:30 Thoth
23:28 Kalle (kafir forever)
23:27 Zenster
23:18 Captain America
23:17 Captain America









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com