Article

2006-01-20 Syria-Lebanon-Iran

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2006-01-20 16:54|| || Front Page|| [12 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Great. On Monday Senator Clinton can introduce a bill on the floor of the Senate authorizing President Bush to take military action against Iran. And I will hold my breath until she does so.

Posted by Matt 2006-01-20 20:01|| 2006-01-20 20:01|| Front Page Top

#2 Yawn

Posted by SR-71">SR-71 2006-01-20 20:03|| 2006-01-20 20:03|| Front Page Top

#3 "In order to prevent that from occurring, we must have more support vigorously and publicly expressed by China and Russia,.."

Barring some kind of Iranian backstabbing of China and Russia, or an out-and-out declaration by Iran that they're pursuing The Bomb, does she really, REALLY think that we'd get Russian and Chinese "support"?

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2006-01-20 20:57|| 2006-01-20 20:57|| Front Page Top

#4 Of course she doesn't BAR. That's the beauty of it. When China and Russia don't support us she can blame Bush for failing to have a muscular enough diplomacy with was caused by the diversion that is Iraq. It's called triangulation, she practically invented it with Billy Blowjob.

Posted by Scott R">Scott R 2006-01-20 21:17|| http://five24.net]">[http://five24.net] 2006-01-20 21:17|| Front Page Top

#5 Ground War-Conventional War, and not merely airstrikes, i.e. MSM-verified "NEW QUAGMIRE" and "ANOTHER US-GOP MISTAKE [ala NO WMDS IN IRAN/NORTH KOREA, etc.]" is what the anti-US agendists desire. The USA must be "justified" in giving up its sovereignty, freedoms and endowments to the future OWG/UNO, O'REILLY's alleged "International Coalition of Nations/States", the latter of which will undoubtedly include and be dominated by America's primary Cold War Commie opponents,i.e Russia-China wid their nuclear arsenals and large armies.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-01-20 22:04|| 2006-01-20 22:04|| Front Page Top

#6 Repeatedly referring to a need for "new vision and leadership"

That's all I need to read. And Hilly, you have that vision and leadership?

Posted by Bobby 2006-01-20 22:12|| 2006-01-20 22:12|| Front Page Top

#7 vision and leadership? No

blind ambition and wholly void of principles and ethics? Yep

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2006-01-20 23:01|| 2006-01-20 23:01|| Front Page Top

17:43 CaziFarkus
23:55 ex-lib
23:54 Salman Rushdie
23:30 Bomb-a-rama
23:29 DMFD
23:25 JosephMendiola
23:20 gromgoru
23:15 Sock Puppet OÂ´ Doom
23:12 ed
23:09 gromgoru
23:07 JosephMendiola
23:05 gromgoru
23:01 Frank G
23:00 gromgoru
22:58 JosephMendiola
22:42 Claiger Ulenter9779
22:40 Frank G
22:36 JosephMendiola
22:29 Sock Puppet OÂ´ Doom
22:12 Al Aska Paul
22:12 Bobby
22:11 Bobby
22:09 Bobby
22:06 Bobby