Article

2006-01-13 Home Front: Culture Wars

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Seafarious 2006-01-13 00:00|| || Front Page|| [4 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 I see Kim's point: the second amendment should allow inidividual citizens to arm themselves like an individual soldier. Higher levels of organization, and weaponry, are reserved for state and federal armies.

One Canadian, in a discussion about the Pentagon's plans for invading Canada, warned us about their snipers. While any sort of "resistance" Canada would put up if we were motivated enough to invade them, would be laughable, BUT I would count on a way higher body count than Iraq solely because of those snipers. Thus, I heartily agree with Kim's suggestion that citizens be allowed to own sniper-worthy weapons: I think it would be possible for Vidalia, Georgia, to field more snipers, albeit not as good, as the Canadians. Multiply that by all the cities and towns in the United States with populations of at least 10,000, and you'll see a situation where nobody would even THINK of trying to invade North Dakota.

Posted by Ptah">Ptah 2006-01-13 10:12|| http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org]">[http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org] 2006-01-13 10:12|| Front Page Top

11:45 Red Dog
11:44 Red Dog AU commish
16:19 Bird Dog
16:10 Bird Dog
10:01 Ray Gunn
09:55 AU commish
23:53 Omeang Grailet5065
23:52 .com
23:48 ed
23:45 anon
23:42 .com
23:38 twobyfour
23:36 Frank G
23:35 twobyfour
23:35 .com
23:34 Seafarious
23:28 3dc
23:25 Frank G
23:08 .com
23:03 twobyfour
23:03 SC88
23:01 .com
23:00 .com
22:58 .com