Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 12/07/2005 View Tue 12/06/2005 View Mon 12/05/2005 View Sun 12/04/2005 View Sat 12/03/2005 View Fri 12/02/2005 View Thu 12/01/2005
1
2005-12-07 Home Front: Politix
Liberals have 'Conservative Envy'
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Bobby 2005-12-07 07:42|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 There is an opening, right now, for the creation of a Conservative party, a party that tries to carve out the most desired elements of the republicans and the democrats. In past, the third parties have failed because they tried to be "top-down", putting up a Presidential candidate without having lower level political support.

So this new party would begin, *not* with the creation of a party, but with the creation of a pledge, think of it as a Contract With America, but one that could be joined by members of both parties, and yet could not be co-opted by either party.

Its issues would be straightforward, taking from the republicans a strong foreign and traditional republican conservative economic policies. From the democrats, ironically, it would take publically popular hypocricies.

For example, legal but discreet abortion on demand ("just do it, and don't tell us about it"); NIMBY-oriented environmental laws, along with the western return of State lands from federal control. Supressing that godawful eminent domain decision by the Supreme Court. Decriminalization of marijuana *and* guns (okay, stole that one from the Libertarians).

Much of what the new party offered would be to eliminate very unpopular recent decisions. Perhaps to re-think the FTAA; the Patriot Act and other internal security laws; and criminal law and justice system reform--not just tort reform.

The biggest issues could be immigration, re-negotiation of Native American & Indigenous treaties, and the restructuring of the income tax, and other federal taxes.

The selling point would be that it would marginalize the extremes of both parties, but *not* be a liberal party of the RINOs and DINOs.
Posted by Anonymoose 2005-12-07 11:00||   2005-12-07 11:00|| Front Page Top

#2 Spot on Moose! Most Dems I know are tired of being associated with the far left and are ripe for a more conservative party, but not enough to be a Repuplican. Pulling the average core frome each part would work.
Posted by 49 pan">49 pan  2005-12-07 13:20||   2005-12-07 13:20|| Front Page Top

#3 The article nailed how the Right has all the ideas and could have added the Left is desperately clinging to their version of historical determinism despite all the contrary evidence.
Posted by phil_b">phil_b  2005-12-07 13:38||   2005-12-07 13:38|| Front Page Top

#4 Exhibit A is the left’s fascination with “unity.”

Political "Unity" is just another way to say "consensus", and consensus ain't democracy.
Posted by Hyper">Hyper  2005-12-07 13:56||   2005-12-07 13:56|| Front Page Top

02:17 dhgmk
23:49 Omeresh Thraitch4407
23:44 Barbara Skolaut
23:25 gromgoru
23:22 RG
23:20 Zhang Fei
23:17 Zhang Fei
23:11 gromgoru
23:01 mac
22:57 gromgoru
22:53 gromgoru
22:43 Frank G
22:38 DMFD
22:37 Mahou Sensei Negi-bozu
22:33 DMFD
22:27 Frank G
22:18 Rafael
22:02 BA
21:58 Anonymoose
21:49 Frank G
21:37 Sliting Glamp4591
21:37 Rafael
21:26 Mike
21:21 Steve White









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com