Article

2005-12-05 Europe

Anger grows in Europe over CIA abductions

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2005-12-05 00:08|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 there is little appetite among European governments to take on the US over its tactics in the war on terror

There is that one judge in Spain however.

Posted by Rafael 2005-12-05 06:33|| 2005-12-05 06:33|| Front Page Top

#2 Hello Hans, you angry enough to keep your BMWs out of those dirty American hands? I know I am more than angry enough to place 100% tariffs on German, French, etc. imports. The next time an attack on the US is launched from Hamburg, then the USAF should revisit Hamburg 1944. US troops and trade out of the Weasels. Keep those billions and factories at home. Consider it Americas Kyoto gift to you assholes.

Posted by ed 2005-12-05 09:08|| 2005-12-05 09:08|| Front Page Top

#3 The article quotes CNN and Der Spiegel. Like either of those two news groups are relavent anymore. The list of countries is interesting though. I think what it really reveals is that publicly all those countries chant aint US crap. Behind closed doors they are supporting our war, or at least at the operational level they are.

Posted by 49 pan">49 pan 2005-12-05 09:17|| 2005-12-05 09:17|| Front Page Top

#4 I still call bullshit. Prove it you socialsit dicks. "Un-named sources" ain't proof. Names, locations, documents (real, not fake) and photos. Otherwise, we will sit by and watch your coming takeover by the Islamists with glee, then nuke your asses.

Posted by mmurray821 2005-12-05 10:04|| 2005-12-05 10:04|| Front Page Top

#5 Why set up prisons in Eastern Europe when the threat of sending them to Israel would get the job done and the Israeli's would be willing to help. Doesn't make sense.

Posted by rjschwarz 2005-12-05 10:14|| 2005-12-05 10:14|| Front Page Top

#6 Secretary Rice before leaving this morning:

-- We cannot discuss information that would compromise the success of intelligence, law enforcement, and military operations. We expect that other nations share this view.

Some governments choose to cooperate with the United States in intelligence, law enforcement, or military matters. That cooperation is a two-way street. We share intelligence that has helped protect European countries from attack, helping save European lives.

It is up to those governments and their citizens to decide if they wish to work with us to prevent terrorist attacks against their own country or other countries, and decide how much sensitive information they can make public. They have a sovereign right to make that choice.

Debate in and among democracies is natural and healthy. I hope that that debate also includes a healthy regard for the responsibilities of governments to protect their citizens.

http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2005/57602.htm

(long article but very clear)

Posted by SwissTex 2005-12-05 13:06|| 2005-12-05 13:06|| Front Page Top

#7 Anger that we can't ship the buggers faster!

People in Europe know I-Slam. Of course the headline should be "Anger grows amongst self proclaimed elite in Europe over CIA abductions".

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2005-12-05 16:54|| 2005-12-05 16:54|| Front Page Top

#8 The Left > "CIA Abuses" > unconfirmed acts of TORTURE automat = #'s of CIA AIRCRAFT FLIGHTS; just as "WMDS" = "NUKES", but not Sarin, Mustard Gas, BioWar, or a few tons of enriched uranium, and even though the Lefties don't say the term "NUKES" on the MSM. AS PER USUAL, ITS THE VOTER'S/MAINSTREAM'S FAULT THE LEFTIES DIDN'T AND DON'T AND WON'T USE THE TERM "NUKES" - you know, REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY and anti-propanganda Secular Moralism.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2005-12-05 20:27|| 2005-12-05 20:27|| Front Page Top

#9 MORE FUD

Posted by 3dc 2005-12-05 21:23|| 2005-12-05 21:23|| Front Page Top

#10 Time for NATO to disperse. We are not in the business of providing protection for ankle-biting pussies

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2005-12-05 21:59|| 2005-12-05 21:59|| Front Page Top

00:00 Aris Katsaris
23:56 DMFD
23:14 LC FOTSGreg
23:01 mojo
22:56 Zhang Fei
22:46 wrinkleneck_trout
22:42 Jomong Slolump1324
22:19 2b
22:18 Frank G
22:18 Eric Jablow
22:15 Frank G
22:14 Frank G
22:07 Shineling Hupaque8028
22:01 Bobby
21:59 Frank G
21:57 Frank G
21:54 Bobby
21:48 jules 2
21:44 Bomb-a-rama
21:37 Eric Jablow
21:36 Bobby
21:29 3dc
21:24 Bobby
21:23 3dc