Article

2005-12-02 Home Front: Politix

MoveOn.org May Not Support Sen. Lieberman

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve 2005-12-02 13:18|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Good. Lieberman should wear MoveOn's opposition as a badge of honor. It takes some mighty big cojones to do what Lieberman has done -- in effect, buck the trend in his party -- and he should be proud of his stance.

Posted by Jonathan">Jonathan 2005-12-02 13:44|| 2005-12-02 13:44|| Front Page Top

#2 Do the Republicans run against Lieberman? As I recall, Bill Buckley got him to run to defeat Weicker. Any one know if there's truth to this?

Posted by Thomomp Glomosing3885 2005-12-02 13:51|| 2005-12-02 13:51|| Front Page Top

#3 Question: how many of MoveOn.org's sponsored candidates have won their elections? If the percentage is low, then what difference does their support/opposition make?

Posted by trailing wife 2005-12-02 13:51|| 2005-12-02 13:51|| Front Page Top

#4 TW, What a rational question. What makes you think it is applicable or relevant to the true believers of the extreme left?

Posted by Omaviting Theresing8523 2005-12-02 13:54|| 2005-12-02 13:54|| Front Page Top

#5 Question: how many of MoveOn.org's sponsored candidates have won their elections?

4 of 26 with over $20 million spent.

Posted by ed 2005-12-02 14:12|| 2005-12-02 14:12|| Front Page Top

#6 Joe Lieberman: the Last Democrat.

Posted by Matt 2005-12-02 14:27|| 2005-12-02 14:27|| Front Page Top

#7 Joe Lieberman and Zell Miller.

Posted by john">john 2005-12-02 14:43|| 2005-12-02 14:43|| Front Page Top

#8 Steny Hoyer also recently spoke against hasty withdrawl.

Posted by liberalhawk 2005-12-02 14:45|| 2005-12-02 14:45|| Front Page Top

#9 LH, That's an insult to Lieberman and Miller.

Posted by Ulomoling Phising5375 2005-12-02 14:46|| 2005-12-02 14:46|| Front Page Top

#10 #4 - TW's question is not relevant to the left, but is of interest to me, and I LOVE the answer in #5. The lefties STILL haven't figgered it out!

Posted by Bobby 2005-12-02 15:53|| 2005-12-02 15:53|| Front Page Top

#11 Lieberman is posturing for the next election. If he can pull the moderate dems from the moonbat pool he could stand a chance next election. He has all the "I support the war and troops" platform pluss the liberal union and minority support. Looks like he has just declaired his intentions.

Posted by 49 pan 2005-12-02 20:01|| 2005-12-02 20:01|| Front Page Top

#12 Joe L won't stand a chance when someone like Biden and Kerry is willing to apply his lips to every leftist buttock to get the nod. I doubt he'll even be allowed to speak at the convention. BTW I actually think he's doing this on principle, not pandering. He's to be saluted. Hell, he's more Republican than Specter

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2005-12-02 20:12|| 2005-12-02 20:12|| Front Page Top

#13 Frank
I might just be getting cynical about the motives of anyone from the left. But You are right that he is to be commended for his stand and I would hope it's on priciple.

Posted by 49 pan">49 pan 2005-12-02 20:54|| 2005-12-02 20:54|| Front Page Top

#14 he'd be 0 for 2 after the first two primaries, and the way the Donk party is drifting to port, he won't have substantial $. I see a quick campaign fold, but he'll stay on message. In my mind that's an indication of some principles of belief....

Posted by Frank G">Frank G 2005-12-02 21:07|| 2005-12-02 21:07|| Front Page Top

23:34 CrazyFool
23:16 Old Patriot
23:00 Black Powa!
22:49 DMFD
22:44 AzCat
22:43 Frank G
22:13 jules 2
21:59 2b
21:50 2b
21:35 JosephMendiola
21:32 2b
21:29 Seafarious
21:26 JosephMendiola
21:23 JosephMendiola
21:19 JosephMendiola
21:16 JerseyMike
21:13 3dc
21:07 Frank G
21:03 lotp
21:02 Red Dog
20:54 49 pan
20:44 BangkokBilly
20:20 49 pan
20:18 mjslack