Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 12/20/2004 View Sun 12/19/2004 View Sat 12/18/2004 View Fri 12/17/2004 View Thu 12/16/2004 View Wed 12/15/2004 View Tue 12/14/2004
1
2004-12-20 Home Front: Politix
The "Nuclear" option explained:
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Cyber Sarge 2004-12-20 4:34:59 PM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Constitutionally, the Senate is supposed to provide "advise and consent" to the President in several important things, mostly confirmations but also in treaties. It is one of their primary reasons for existing as a separate house from the House of Representatives. For this reason, they will probably never agree to surrender or dilute this power.
Posted by Anonymoose 2004-12-20 5:08:45 PM||   2004-12-20 5:08:45 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 CS - the ability to windbag in front of CSPAN and Network News is one of the choice perks in keeping relected. They'll never give that up voluntarily. A SCOTUS vote and subsequent grandstanding is something the Chuck Schumers, Ted Kennedy's, Joe Bidens, Chuck Hagels, John McCain's.... LIVE FOR
Posted by Frank G  2004-12-20 5:23:33 PM||   2004-12-20 5:23:33 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Common Repubs, get some brass ones.
Posted by Capt America  2004-12-20 5:37:29 PM||   2004-12-20 5:37:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Agreed that they love the spotlight. But sometimes they should just do the right thing BECAUSE it is the right thing to do. There are too many liberal judges ruling this country from behind the bench. If the bench was attempting to reverse tyranny then that would be one thing, what they are trting to impose is a liberal/socialists agenda on and in spite of the majority.
Posted by Cyber Sarge  2004-12-20 5:53:44 PM||   2004-12-20 5:53:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 We'll see. They've been disappointing Me since late 1995, so I'm pessimistic (all My surprises are pleasant that way).

Note, -Moose, that no one is trying to eliminate the Senate's vote, nor reasonable debate, just the filibuster. Note that there is no filibuster in the Constitution, nor in the Federalist Papers (unless I missed it).

I actually favor the filibuster on legislation, even when the good guys have the majority.
Posted by jackal  2004-12-20 8:38:06 PM|| [http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2004-12-20 8:38:06 PM|| Front Page Top

00:42 Billy Hank
00:02 True German Ally
23:59 True German Ally
23:53 Grolurt Shutle8331
23:49 Grolurt Shutle8331
23:46 Aris Katsaris
23:38 Ady
23:35 True German Ally
23:17 Mike Sylwester
23:15 Mike Sylwester
23:03 cingold
23:00 Bomb-a-rama
22:52 Aris Katsaris
22:50 Poison Reverse
22:47 Asedwich
22:46 Asedwich
22:44 Aris Katsaris
22:44 Poison Reverse
22:40 Atomic Conspiracy
22:39 True German Ally
22:36 True German Ally
22:36 jackal
22:33 Frank G
22:33 Poison Reverse









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com