Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 07/10/2004 View Fri 07/09/2004 View Thu 07/08/2004 View Wed 07/07/2004 View Tue 07/06/2004 View Mon 07/05/2004 View Sun 07/04/2004
1
2004-07-10 Iraq-Jordan
Another Iraqi group’s gunning for Zarqawi
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Dan Darling 2004-07-10 9:41:43 PM|| || Front Page|| [11132 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 If the US with all its mighty force can not get him, how do you think a group of thugs will?
Posted by Anonymous1126 2004-07-10 12:24:08 AM||   2004-07-10 12:24:08 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 See the Thulfiqar Army, Anon -- did you say that never could the US make Tater give? Actually, we only had to pay off those who already bristled under his Islamist yoke >=3

Re: Seif Allah -- GO YOU! Well, until you turn against the US, in which case we'll have to kill you, but until then, TAKE ZARQAWI'S HEAD!
Posted by Edward Yee  2004-07-10 12:36:00 AM|| [http://edwardyee.fanworks.net]  2004-07-10 12:36:00 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 I dunno if the "group of thugs" can get him, but I like the idea of them kaing Zarqawi nervous and jumpy.

Someone here a few days back pointed out that in a way, this isn't such a good thing -- last thing Iraq needs right now is a bunch of new vigilante groups running around. I tend to agree -- after Zarqawi gets bagged.
Posted by Steve White  2004-07-10 12:46:31 AM||   2004-07-10 12:46:31 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 What would be really encouraging is for Iraqis dressed in government uniforms, without masks, to announce and carry out aggressive operations against Zarqawi, criminal gangs, and Ba'athists (or whatever the hell they're called now that they don't even have a bogus ideology to wrap around their tribally organized avarice and power lust). There's some video I'm looking forward to ....
Posted by Verlaine 2004-07-10 1:51:14 AM||   2004-07-10 1:51:14 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 intolerance is the key to the middle east
Posted by Long Hair Republican  2004-07-10 2:04:57 AM||   2004-07-10 2:04:57 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Isn't "double edged" a slick new razor?
Posted by Capt America  2004-07-10 2:07:13 AM|| [http://captamerica.blogspot.com/]  2004-07-10 2:07:13 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 If the US with all its mighty force can not get him, how do you think a group of thugs will?

Iraq is a big place, and even Saddam wasn't found in a day. What's more, a group of thugs can blend right in with the population, while uniformed U.S service personnel stick out like a sore thumb.
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-07-10 5:33:08 AM||   2004-07-10 5:33:08 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 "If the US with all its mighty force can not get him, how do you think a group of thugs will?"

-did it ever dawn on any of you that maybe *we are* behind this. Imagine the possibilities.
Posted by Jarhead 2004-07-10 8:04:45 AM||   2004-07-10 8:04:45 AM|| Front Page Top

#9 Hell, we ain't never found D. B. Cooper, neither. Proves nothing.

What a "gang of thugs" can do is use nastier methods of getting to Zarqawi... methods that would make reporters and Democrats swoon.
(Not that it takes much to make them swoon.)
Posted by eLarson 2004-07-10 8:48:43 AM||   2004-07-10 8:48:43 AM|| Front Page Top

#10 Think back. Wasn't the "Double Edged Sword" of whoever name used before? It sounds familiar.
Posted by Anonymoose 2004-07-10 10:31:41 AM||   2004-07-10 10:31:41 AM|| Front Page Top

#11 #10--- There was group named Thul Fiqar al-Batar which translates into "the double-edged sword" carried by Grand Imam Ali. This group rose up to oppose Sadr.
Posted by Anonymous5668 2004-07-10 12:46:36 PM||   2004-07-10 12:46:36 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Let me liberate you from your ignorance.
1. After WW2, the Allies implemented a "De-Nazification" plan for Occupied Germany, because Nazis were the main enemy.
2. After GW2, the Bushies implemented a "De-Baathization" plan for Occupied Germany, because the Bushies refuse to recognize Islamofascism as an enemy ideology.
3. Bush is a pathological anti-Secular, who still pays consulting fees to terrorist front groups like the ISNA and CAIR.
4. By effectively outlawing Secularism in Iraq, the Bushies delivered a window of opportunity to Islamofascists of both the al-Qaeda and Bisaji (Shiite) varieties, creating anti-American terror bases in both Fallujah and Najaf.
5. The Bushies have allowed as many as 10,000 Iranian animals to make pilgrimages to Iraq, each day, even as Iran's tyrants were inciting violence against America. (Numerous Iranians have been arrested as terror suspects in De-Secularized-Bush Iraq.
6. Because of the Bushies enabling of cultural-unification of the Iran terror state and Shiite Iraq, the elections next year will be directed by Iran, who will use its captive Shiite majority to enable Iranian occupation of Iraq. At that point, Iran will begin exterminating Iraqi minorities, and will - thanks to Bush's ideological stupidity - possess over 60% of all Middle East oil.
7. Bush indulgence of the Islamofascist enemy, will make America the laughing stock of the world.

If you care about American security, then you will work for the nuclear annihilation of Fallujah and Najaf, to be followed by the forced Secularization of Iraq. You will also work for the over-throw of the Iranian, Saud and Paki tyrannies, that are either protected or subsidized or served by the Bush family clowns.
Posted by Dog Bites Trolls 2004-07-10 3:23:58 PM||   2004-07-10 3:23:58 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Got proof of any of those wild accusations about President Bush, DBT?
We'll wait.
***crickets***
Posted by Jen  2004-07-10 3:29:05 PM|| [http://www.greatestjeneration.com]  2004-07-10 3:29:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 cut out them damn crickets! I can't hear DBT's response!
Posted by Frank G  2004-07-10 3:42:50 PM||   2004-07-10 3:42:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#15 
If you care about American security, then you will work for the nuclear annihilation of Fallujah and Najaf, to be followed by the forced Secularization of Iraq.

Dog Bites Trolls, how many supporters do you have for your proposal? If you have no supporters at all anywhere, then maybe you ought to rethink your position.
.
Posted by Mike Sylwester 2004-07-10 4:11:26 PM||   2004-07-10 4:11:26 PM|| Front Page Top

#16 If you care about American security, then you will work for the nuclear annihilation of Fallujah and Najaf,..

I'd settle for a massive JDAM attack on insurgent nests in the Fallujah area. Nothing that has happened there so far rises to the point of a nuclear response, and I can't see a scenario that would.
Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-07-10 6:02:06 PM||   2004-07-10 6:02:06 PM|| Front Page Top

#17 DBT,
Let me ask you a question: Have you ever worked with or on nuclear weapons?
I have.BTW, I'm asking you now, don't tell us 'you know' and quote one of the many excellent and reliable books or websites available. Anyone can do that.
It's been my experience that those who have never been up close and personal with the damned things tend to be the ones who suggest their use first. And if your response is, "well, it was simply rhetorical', that's even worse, because you either know what they're capable of and what their use represents then said it anyways, or you hadn't the faintest clue...and then said it anyways.

Mike
Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2004-07-10 6:05:28 PM||   2004-07-10 6:05:28 PM|| Front Page Top

15:09 Anonymous5908
00:48 Anonymous5749
02:34 therien
02:33 therien
01:40 Anonymous4617
01:24 .com
01:09 Anonymous4617
00:45 DANEgerus
00:44 Lucky
00:37 .com
00:21 Anonymous4617
00:17 Mike Sylwester
23:38 Old Grouch
23:19 tipper
23:11 .com
23:05 Old Grouch
22:59 Lucky
22:57 .com
22:52 .com
22:34 TS(vice girl)
22:32 Zenster
22:27 Seafarious
22:21 Dragon Fly
22:21 mhw









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com