Article

2004-06-29 Iraq-Jordan

Arrest Warrants Issued for 12 Top Iraqi Suspects

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve 2004-06-29 10:07:58 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Suspects? Alleged perpetrators? They are assisting the authorities in their investigation.

Posted by Anonymoose 2004-06-29 10:19:28 AM|| 2004-06-29 10:19:28 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 They're gonna need a lot of rope.

If they don't have enough of that, electricity will do.

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-06-29 10:34:25 AM|| 2004-06-29 10:34:25 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 "here's a shovel, dig up that IED over there...yes, you can do it....quit yer crying dammit!"

Posted by Frank G 2004-06-29 10:41:09 AM|| 2004-06-29 10:41:09 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Iraq will get legal custody of Saddam, but the US will get to see him every other weekend.

Posted by Liberalhawk 2004-06-29 3:26:29 PM|| 2004-06-29 3:26:29 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Speaking of Sammy, I was wondering how much information we squeezed out of him. I know that any public statements would be disinformation, probably, especially if we said that we did not get much out of Sammy.

Posted by Alaska Paul 2004-06-29 5:18:15 PM|| 2004-06-29 5:18:15 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 That is very interesting. Al-Douri seems to be in custody. I don't remember ever seeing that reported on the news. Except for a red herring about his capture several months ago (or I thought it was a red herring!)...then later, no, seems no one had any information about Al-Douri's capture.

I think that was after Saddam's capture. Within a few days, anyway (too darn lazy to look it up).

This morning I saw his name listed among the indictees. I wondered then if they'd caught him or he was just being indicted in absentia.

I thought I just missed it, but the phrase "dentention date not known" pretty much says it all. (Unless it means they don't know when they'll catch him...haha)

If they do indeed have Al-Douri and that wasn't public knowledge until now...well, that clears up some mysteries, fer sure.

Posted by Quana 2004-06-29 6:05:35 PM|| 2004-06-29 6:05:35 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 I particularly like seeing Tareq Aziz (11) on the list. Somehow the smooth sophisticated spokesmen who spend their time schmoozing with diplomats at the U.N. and lying in press conferences in elegant and correct English piss me off more than the more obvious thugs.

Posted by Dr. Weevil 2004-06-29 10:23:22 PM|| [http://www.doctorweevil.org] 2004-06-29 10:23:22 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Quana - I'm 99% certain "Red" Al Douri isn't in custody - they'll try him in absentia, I believe.

Posted by .com 2004-06-29 10:29:18 PM|| 2004-06-29 10:29:18 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Ok, I've looked around a bit and I think you are right, .com. The phrase "detention date not known" is a strange way to say "we ain't got 'em". Perhaps it means "we'll get him, no doubts about that". Maybe it is translated from the Arabic, a grandiloquent and effusive verbiage for "nope, don't got 'im, yet".

Just looks strange to me. And confusing for those of us with slower synaptic responses. Heh.

Posted by Quana 2004-06-29 11:01:52 PM|| 2004-06-29 11:01:52 PM|| Front Page Top

01:16 Anonymous5539
11:36 jules 187
11:10 ConservativeView
12:43 The Doctor
09:22 Anon1
09:15 Anon1
09:05 Anon1
08:58 Anon1
03:09 Super Hose
01:16 Anonymous4617
01:08 Rafael
01:05 Rafael
00:54 Aris Katsaris
00:40 Rafael
00:26 Rafael
00:04 Fred
00:00 Frank G
23:47 joy
23:41 Frank G
23:40 Frank G
23:32 Pappy
23:27 OldSpook
23:27 Aris Katsaris
23:15 OldSpook