Article

2004-03-12 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by tipper 2004-03-12 11:00:43 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 So did Shell and Exxon want too much â or too little â pumping? Was the Iraq conspiracy a messy crisis to disrupt production as an excuse to jack up prices, or a surgical strike to garner Third-World resources on the cheap to power wasteful American SUVs?

Related topic: an intriguing angle on the current rise in gasoline prices.

(Via Instapundit)

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-3-12 11:20:31 AM|| 2004-3-12 11:20:31 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 I'm sorry, BAR, but you need to advertise the link better.

See the article BAR is referring to: It documents Saudi actions to throttle the economy of the United States to prevent George Bush's re-election.

Posted by Ptah 2004-3-12 11:48:51 AM|| [http://www.crusaderwarcollege.org] 2004-3-12 11:48:51 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Oh I dunno, I guess I like to understate things... :)

Posted by Bomb-a-rama 2004-3-12 11:35:24 PM|| 2004-3-12 11:35:24 PM|| Front Page Top

08:04 Anonymous
07:40 ed
07:32 ed
00:38 Rick
00:23 Atomic Conspiracy
00:02 Jennie Taliaferro
23:49 Bomb-a-rama
23:41 CrazyFool
23:35 Bomb-a-rama
23:31 .com
23:21 Barbara Skolaut
23:15 Barbara Skolaut
23:14 ex-lib
23:12 Barbara Skolaut
23:02 GK
22:58 ex-lib
22:44 ex-lib
22:41 Dave D.
22:41 Alaska Paul
22:39 Frank G
22:22 Mr. Davis
22:10 Atomic Conspiracy
22:08 Antiwar
22:04 frank martin