Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 01/09/2004 View Thu 01/08/2004 View Wed 01/07/2004 View Tue 01/06/2004 View Mon 01/05/2004 View Sun 01/04/2004 View Sat 01/03/2004
1
2004-01-09 Middle East
Powell rejects Qurei's 'bi-national' threat
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Fred Pruitt 2004-01-09 23:25|| || Front Page|| [3 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 I ain't buying the 2 state/aparthied comparison.
How can it be aparthied if the Paleo's have thier own international borders?
How can it be aparthied if the Paleo's have thier own governent,independant of Israelie control?
Posted by raptor  2004-1-9 7:30:12 AM||   2004-1-9 7:30:12 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Fred, are we forgetting that the Paleos want ALL of Israel, West Bank, and Gaza? This is not news, only a repeat of an earlier demand. I like Sharon’s solution: Build a Wall/Declare a border. That would leave ALL the (PLO) players swinging in the wind. Of course it lead to a ?new? terror state in the middle east.
Posted by Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter)  2004-1-9 11:55:24 AM||   2004-1-9 11:55:24 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 I've always argued that Israel should unilaterally declare a Palestinian state. Tell them, here is your country, these are your borders, Yasser is your leader. Oh, and any Palestinian terror attack will be considered an Act of War, between two states.
Posted by Swiggles 2004-1-9 12:28:04 PM||   2004-1-9 12:28:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 the wall needs a moat with crocidiles and shit to eat up any thick witted palo's who cross it
Posted by Jon Shep 2004-1-9 3:11:27 PM||   2004-1-9 3:11:27 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 It will be interesting to see what happens when Israel has its wall and says the paleos are not our problem. Its a mess and they have blown their only chance to get out of the mess - leveraging off Israel's success. Its a problem that no-one can fix and I doubt anyone will seriously try. The press and NGOs will leave cos it will be too dangerous, and then this will be the mother-of-all-failed-states. Then what? Either they are left to die like flies in their own mess or we will have a radical 21st century solution. I personally favour resettling them to Saudi Arabia, probably at gunpoint and SA picking up the tab.
Posted by phil_b 2004-1-9 6:22:44 PM||   2004-1-9 6:22:44 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 We've got to nip this "declare a one-state solution" gambit in the bud, pronto. Can you imagine if Mexico gets wind of this? We might end up having 60 states stretching down through Central America. That's too damn many stars on the flag. I refuse to memorize any additional state capitals (I still get the capitals of the Washington and Oregon mixed up.)
Posted by Super Hose  2004-1-9 11:51:21 PM||   2004-1-9 11:51:21 PM|| Front Page Top

11:32 Lucky
06:45 Super Hose
00:04 Rick
23:53 Super Hose
23:51 Super Hose
23:40 Super Hose
23:35 Super Hose
23:30 Old Patriot
23:30 Super Hose
23:27 Super Hose
23:24 Super Hose
23:21 Super Hose
23:17 CrazyFool
23:14 Super Hose
23:12 Observer
23:02 tipper
23:01 Super Hose
22:59 Barbara Skolaut
22:53 Super Hose
22:53 Zhang Fei
22:48 andrew k
22:45 andrew k
22:43 Observer
22:42 Atomic Conspiracy









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com