Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Tue 04/15/2003 View Mon 04/14/2003 View Sun 04/13/2003 View Sat 04/12/2003 View Fri 04/11/2003 View Thu 04/10/2003 View Wed 04/09/2003
1
2003-04-15 Iran
Iranian Hard-liner Says U.S. Must ’Reward’ Tehran
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Yosemite Sam 2003-04-15 12:52 pm|| || Front Page|| [14 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Ummmmm, the last time we took a "wiser approach" to Iran we ended up supporting a Shah. I say we take a more foolish approach and promise Iran that we won't nuke it back to the stone age (not very far to go, actually) if they start playing ball according to our rules.
Posted by FormerLiberal 2003-04-15 13:07:31||   2003-04-15 13:07:31|| Front Page Top

#2 Can you say "Bakhsheesh"?? Bakhsheesh was "tribute" paid to government middlemen in the old Ottoman Empire to get them to actually do some work. Sounds like Iran is trying to revive the old system, just as they've tried to turn the clock back in social development.

Sorry, the United States is not for sale, and neither is our political or cultural interaction with others. Try Russia. Or France. Or maybe even Guyana. One of them might take you up on it.
Posted by Old Patriot  2003-04-15 13:07:54||   2003-04-15 13:07:54|| Front Page Top

#3 God bless the US of A, you've never done anything bad in history's past, have you assholes!
Posted by Anonymo 2003-04-15 13:12:32||   2003-04-15 13:12:32|| Front Page Top

#4 You would think people would notice that, right or wrong, the hard men are in charge in Washington right now and they would be wise not to push their luck.
Posted by Hiryu 2003-04-15 13:12:40||   2003-04-15 13:12:40|| Front Page Top

#5  "But if it expects Iran to step back and not ask for rewards, it's clear that we cannot reach any conclusion"

We've got your rewards right here, pal *does crotch grab*. Iranian mullahs who can pretend there's any benefit to us by normalizing relations with their current regime will still be wondering what happened when the people start stringing them up. Fantasyland is apparently open in Iran
Posted by Frank G  2003-04-15 13:16:13||   2003-04-15 13:16:13|| Front Page Top

#6 This is a thought that deserves a middle finger salute.
Posted by Douglas De Bono  2003-04-15 13:30:26|| [www.douglasdebono.com]  2003-04-15 13:30:26|| Front Page Top

#7 Anonymo

You think once damned, always damned? Then every nation on the planet is irredeemable!

Douglas De Bono

Absolutely! One "I'm #1 salute" @ the tyrants, coming up…
Posted by KP 2003-04-15 14:36:47||   2003-04-15 14:36:47|| Front Page Top

#8 Interesting note... I think there are 2 points to keep in mind about Iran and their "leaders."

1) Shi'a
The "black hats" that run the shouting match called Iran are supposedly descendents of Big Mo. Think about it: this is a finite number. The Sunni's just promote the "holiest" guys... so there's an unlimited supply of foolishness.

So the Shi'a side of the equation is weak. Hey, 10 or 15 TLAM's could take out 75% of the black hats in a flash.

2) REAL Revolution
The Iranian people, fed up with these asshats, are probably going to "depose" them (from Gov't, at least) sooner, rather than later. The demographics are written and these goofs won't be able to stop the tide. Ironically, they STARTED it when they took over - and banned contraception.

I just love it when people parade back and forth in life's shooting gallery.

If you fuck with the bull, sooner or later you'll get the horn.
Posted by PD 2003-04-15 15:57:00||   2003-04-15 15:57:00|| Front Page Top

#9 To PD: Big Mo didn't have any sons and only daughter who lived beyond childhood (assuming the accuracy of the islamic holy stuff. So the biological line of prophesy is weak. What is nice about the Shites (aside from what their name connotes in lower anglosaxon) is that the weakness of the biologic succession should imply a separation of religion and govt. Khomeini reversed this but given the mess the theocrats have made of Iran in the past two decades, there is a good chance it could go back the separation idea.
Posted by mhw 2003-04-15 17:26:37||   2003-04-15 17:26:37|| Front Page Top

#10 'What is nice about the Shites (aside from what their name connotes in lower anglosaxon)'

MHW: Oh no, now I just peed *my* pants .. snigger snigger..
Posted by anon1 2003-04-16 02:41:27||   2003-04-16 02:41:27|| Front Page Top

22:28 prometheus genius
16:27 Samma-lamma
16:26 Samma-lamma
16:21 Samma-lamma
14:18 Shana
12:36 raptor
10:07 raptor
12:13 raptor
09:48 raptor
08:28 liberalhawk
07:17 Hiryu
06:25 Ptah
02:41 anon1
00:42 Scott
00:07 Dan Darling
23:59 True German Ally
23:51 PD
23:39 Old Patriot
23:30 Scott
23:30 PD
23:26 Old Patriot
23:21 Old Patriot
23:17 Bomb-a-rama
23:15 Old Patriot









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com