Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 04/03/2003 View Wed 04/02/2003 View Tue 04/01/2003 View Mon 03/31/2003 View Sun 03/30/2003 View Sat 03/29/2003 View Fri 03/28/2003
1
2003-04-03 India-Pakistan
’Killing Hindus’ is the best approach: LeT founder
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by rg117 2003-04-03 07:58 am|| || Front Page|| [9 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 maybe we're just overlooking our cultural differences? "Killing Hindus" might have a totally different meaning there? Or was it a Freudian slip? Naaahhhhh
Posted by Frank G  2003-04-03 08:19:11||   2003-04-03 08:19:11|| Front Page Top

#2 He did seven months and a judge sprung him? Pakistan: The system works. Better waste this psycho next time.
Posted by tu3031 2003-04-03 08:53:04||   2003-04-03 08:53:04|| Front Page Top

#3 Pakistani clerics have just advocated the use of Pak nuclear weapons against Americans, in defense of Iraq. And the Bush' media will suppress coverage of this atrocity, as they covered up Jamaat-i-Islami harborage of al-Qaeda.
http://nni-news.com/today/main/main-06.htm

The Bush government's indulgence of religious fanaticism while promoting one-time "democracy" in Muslim tyrannies, has delivered Islamist victories in Pakistan and Turkey. Iraq will be next, unless every Muslim jihadi - including the clerics who preach genocide in mosques - becomes a war target.

One Pakistani jihadi has this to say: "Despite their disingenuous talk of freedom and democracy, Bush and Blair must know that bringing true democracies to the Middle East, and the Muslim world in general, will have the oppostie effect to the one they hope for and will go against their own interests. It is unlikely that any democratic Muslim country today will ever elect a pro-Western government." Polls conducted in various Muslim majority countries indicate open support of 40-60% for al-Qaeda. Jihad cults dominate national life in these entities.
http://www.balochistanpost.com/item.asp?ID=3669

It is pure folly to spend billions on behalf of limited war, while the bigger enemy waits in the wings to be delivered victory in the name of one-time "democracy." It is urgent that Coalition troops target both Saddamites and Islamo-Fascists in Iraq, and prohibit Islamic constitutionalism, as a threat to humanity.


Posted by Anonon 2003-04-03 09:54:34||   2003-04-03 09:54:34|| Front Page Top

#4 For some reason, the Paks keeps saying that there isn't any evidence against the Fundos. Its not enough that they openly campaign for the killing of Hindus, Jews, and Christians. Its not enough that they openly generate funds for their terror cause. An its not enough that after each terror attack in Kashmir, they celebrate and gloat about it. But this still isn't enough proof for the Pak authorities. Obviously they are not psychotic, they're just misunderstood.
Posted by rg117 2003-04-03 10:13:25||   2003-04-03 10:13:25|| Front Page Top

#5 in fact the jihadis lost in most of Pakistan.

In turkey the islamists who won have been stepping gingerly so far.
Posted by liberalhawk 2003-04-03 10:15:57||   2003-04-03 10:15:57|| Front Page Top

#6 Personally, I think it unfair to compare the Islamist in Turkey to the Fundos in Pakistan. The Turkish government is Islamic in much the same way the UK or US government is Christian. The Pak Government is Islamic in the way that the KKK is Christian.
Posted by rg117 2003-04-03 10:27:30||   2003-04-03 10:27:30|| Front Page Top

#7 liberalhawk:
As I write, Musharaf's puppet party - Pakistan Muslim League (Qaid e Azam) is preparing to unite with the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal, to control Pakistan's Parliament. The MMA can put millions of people in the streets at short notice, so Musharaf is bowing down to them, while the State Department whitewashes Pak jihadism. The benefits of Bush's engagement with the terror state don't come close to covering the costs.
Posted by Anonon 2003-04-03 10:33:25||   2003-04-03 10:33:25|| Front Page Top

#8 It's seems so incredebly strange to me as an Indian, that the US government seems to think that India (the world's largest democracy, nuclear trigger in the control of the civilian government) should be treated as an equal to Pakland (the islamic, extremist, fundamentalist dictatorship, nuclear trigger in the hands of the Military). Even going so far as to deny India Defence technology [US: Aid conditional on no "Phalcon" sale to India]. Whilst at the same time, China continues to provide Pakland with both Nuclear and Missile technology [Is China wanting to have an Indo-Pak war?]
Posted by rg117 2003-04-03 12:06:17||   2003-04-03 12:06:17|| Front Page Top

#9 I agree rg. But sooner or later the US will shift alliances toward India.
Posted by RW 2003-04-03 16:04:12||   2003-04-03 16:04:12|| Front Page Top

#10 Comon guys India an ally? India was the nearest thing the USSR had to an ally during the cold war. It has continually demonstrated an anti-American posture. We need another France? The Pakis and Indians deserve each other. And don't give us that India is a democracy muck, the wankers kill over 2,000 people each election and the same people keep running the government. Its sort of Chicago democracy, except for the murders.
Posted by TJ Jackson  2003-04-04 00:41:28||   2003-04-04 00:41:28|| Front Page Top

#11 TJ Wankson,
at least in India the guy/party with the largest number of votes actually wins the election. Unlike your screwed up system where the guy who gets the minority of votes whilst taking it up the ass from Kenny Boy gets his daddy's judges to put him in power.
And as far as India being close to USSR is concerned. India was in the non-aligned movement but whilst the US didn't sell any defence equipment to India the USSR was quite happy to provide the goods. Might I add, at the same time the US was cosying up to both the Jihadi Paks and Bin-Laden.
Do you even know anything about Indian elections. There is a huge number of political parties each with some power, the central government is made up of about 30 different parties. So when you say that the same people keep running the government, you're talking from your ass.
Posted by rg117 2003-04-04 07:51:00||   2003-04-04 07:51:00|| Front Page Top

08:42 raptor
08:34 Ernest Brown
08:12 raptor
07:51 rg117
07:30 raptor
06:25 raptor
05:43 Deep Throat
03:32 anon1
01:19 Anonymous
01:12 Anonymous
01:06 john
01:04 Anonymous
01:00 TJ Jackson
00:49 TJ Jackson
00:43 Anonymous
00:41 TJ Jackson
00:39 Kalle (kafir forever)
00:33 TJ Jackson
00:30 Anonymous
00:28 TJ Jackson
23:50 Steve White
22:29 tu3031
22:23 True German Ally
22:18 True German Ally









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com