Article

2004-12-31 Terror Networks & Islam

Chemical weapons are the easiest route for terrorists

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Dan Darling 2004-12-31 12:46:52 AM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Man I hate the MSM. I feel like they need a new monikor - something that indicates that they confirm for the asshats what to do, how to do it, where to get it, how to use it, when to use it, and who to use it on for maximum effect. All that comes to mind is collaborators, facilitators, counselors, etc. Sigh. Not nasty enough to convey my feelings.

Posted by .com 2004-12-31 1:50:34 AM|| 2004-12-31 1:50:34 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Over-rated threat: "85,000 lethal doses", for example, would require a cluster of 85,000 people and perfect dispersal -- perfect positioning, no wind, no evacuation, etc. Still a serious issue, but the MSM loves to hype it up.

Posted by Tom 2004-12-31 11:39:41 AM|| 2004-12-31 11:39:41 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 Perhaps I'm being silly, but I find this comforting. I read this to mean that I needn't worry about biological or nuclear (whether the big babies or just dirty bombs) attacks in my suburb any more. And chemical attacks, from what I understand, are only effective within a certain limited area, and only on the individuals who are on the spot at that moment, or immediately downwind. No secondary infections, no longterm contamination of the site. Thus, not nearly as effective as a terror weapon, either. The idiots would be better off sticking with explosives and AK-47s!

Posted by trailing wife 2004-12-31 8:26:16 PM|| 2004-12-31 8:26:16 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Perhaps I'm being silly, but I find this comforting. I read this to mean that I needn't worry about biological or nuclear (whether the big babies or just dirty bombs) attacks in my suburb any more. And chemical attacks, from what I understand, are only effective within a certain limited area, and only on the individuals who are on the spot at that moment, or immediately downwind. No secondary infections, no longterm contamination of the site. Thus, not nearly as effective as a terror weapon, either. The idiots would be better off sticking with explosives and AK-47s!

Posted by trailing wife 2004-12-31 8:26:25 PM|| 2004-12-31 8:26:25 PM|| Front Page Top

18:53 cingold
18:53 cingold
18:52 cingold
18:52 cingold
01:00 .com
00:00 Crereper Thomble7221
23:42 Aris Katsaris
23:37 lex
23:36 Sock Puppet of Doom
23:36 Me
23:15 lex
23:07 lex
22:46 Lone Ranger
22:30 Chuck Simmins
22:29 Chuck Simmins
22:27 Glenmore
21:58 .com
21:55 Frank G
21:51 Sock Puppet of Doom
21:50 Stephen
21:48 Sock Puppet of Doom
21:37 Dave D.
21:32 Edward Yee
21:24 Frank G