Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 12/15/2004 View Tue 12/14/2004 View Mon 12/13/2004 View Sun 12/12/2004 View Sat 12/11/2004 View Fri 12/10/2004 View Thu 12/09/2004
1
2004-12-15 Europe
Higher, longer, wider (faster, cheaper)
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Steve 2004-12-15 12:41:21 PM|| || Front Page|| [1 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Well, I guess it's okay... as long as they didn't use any nuclear technology.
Posted by BH 2004-12-15 1:08:21 PM||   2004-12-15 1:08:21 PM|| Front Page Top

#2 It's pretty, but not nearly as cost effective as this early Frank G effort.
Posted by Shipman 2004-12-15 1:18:04 PM||   2004-12-15 1:18:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#3 Ah, yes. I believe that was built during his "minimalist" period, Ship.
Posted by tu3031 2004-12-15 1:20:53 PM||   2004-12-15 1:20:53 PM|| Front Page Top

#4 Its certainly high and long but from images I saw on TV, its only 4 lanes wide.

It will probably sway in high wind.
Posted by mhw 2004-12-15 2:08:40 PM||   2004-12-15 2:08:40 PM|| Front Page Top

#5 Well, mhw, if there is no strong resonance at a low frequency, it might not be too bad. I sure hope we've learned that from Tacoma Narrows.

I am also quite surprised that it is a private project. I'd figure that in the EU something like that would always be a government project.
Posted by jackal  2004-12-15 2:31:05 PM|| [http://home.earthlink.net/~sleepyjackal/index.html]  2004-12-15 2:31:05 PM|| Front Page Top

#6 I found an even earlier one by Alaska Paul.
Posted by Seafarious  2004-12-15 2:32:50 PM||   2004-12-15 2:32:50 PM|| Front Page Top

#7 Let's hope they did a better job than they did on the Paris airport

Or Peugot. Or Renault. Or Citroen.

French engineering. 'nuff said.
Posted by PlanetDan  2004-12-15 2:40:56 PM||   2004-12-15 2:40:56 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 I am not a bridge designer, but I think higher and heavier isn't good for a bridge.
Posted by Brett_the_Quarkian 2004-12-15 2:42:20 PM||   2004-12-15 2:42:20 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 Nice pictures here
Posted by Mrs. Davis 2004-12-15 2:56:34 PM||   2004-12-15 2:56:34 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 Jackal
I presume they designed resonance dampers in; however, swaying may reduce the fatigue life of some of the bridge members.

Even though the article says it was a privately financed project, you can bet the farm there are govt subsidies of various kinds. This is, after all, France.
Posted by mhw 2004-12-15 3:32:27 PM||   2004-12-15 3:32:27 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 LOL Em.
Posted by Shipman 2004-12-15 5:40:38 PM||   2004-12-15 5:40:38 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Holy shit, that's a big sucker.

Beautiful, yes, but I think I'd drive around, thankyouverymuch.
Posted by Barbara Skolaut  2004-12-15 6:25:16 PM||   2004-12-15 6:25:16 PM|| Front Page Top

21:56 Chineter Spoluger1554
21:54 Chineter Spoluger1554
21:54 Chineter Spoluger1554
21:52 Chineter Spoluger1554
21:52 Chineter Spoluger1554
16:21 lex
16:21 lex
16:20 lex
16:20 lex
16:19 lex
16:19 lex
16:19 lex
16:19 lex
16:18 lex
16:18 lex
00:11 phil_b
00:02 Pappy
23:53 anonymous2U
23:51 phil_b
23:49 trailing wife
23:45 Pappy
23:43 Pappy
23:41 trailing wife
23:40 ed









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com