Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Mon 12/13/2010 View Sun 12/12/2010 View Sat 12/11/2010 View Fri 12/10/2010 View Thu 12/09/2010 View Wed 12/08/2010 View Tue 12/07/2010
1
2010-12-13 Home Front: Politix
Judge in Va. strikes down federal health care law
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by DarthVader 2010-12-13 12:37|| || Front Page|| [2 views ]  Top

#1 Judge Hudson on the government’s argument that it has the power to require individuals to buy health insurance:

“Of course, the same reasoning could apply to transportation, housing or nutritional decisions,” Hudson wrote. “This broad definition of the economic activity subject to congressional regulation lacks logical limitation” and is unsupported by previous legal cases around the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.


Are ya taking it seriously yet, you despotic dingbat?
Posted by ryuge 2010-12-13 14:01||   2010-12-13 14:01|| Front Page Top

#2 He held it severable because otherwise he would have had to strike down the entire law, and he didn't want to go that far.
Posted by Iblis 2010-12-13 14:02||   2010-12-13 14:02|| Front Page Top

#3 The case MUST be made that it is NOT severable, so the ENTIRE law can be struck doown.
Posted by OldSpook 2010-12-13 19:01||   2010-12-13 19:01|| Front Page Top

#4 he pulled the non-severability from his ass. It will get a looking-at
Posted by Frank G 2010-12-13 21:15||   2010-12-13 21:15|| Front Page Top

#5 Having just finished it, Hudson's decision seems a reasonable best-case scenario. However while it's not exactly a house of cards there are many avenues of attack open to the government that will appeal strongly to appellate judges should such be predisposed to want to uphold the new law.

If this decision stands (big "if") it will likely either accelerate the intended consequences (bankrupting private insurers), force a massive overhaul of the legislation, or both despite blocking only one narrow provision of the bill. But it's worth remembering that two other federal judges have already found in favor of the government and others have merely dismissed challenges. This is an important first step but no more than that.
Posted by AzCat 2010-12-13 21:37||   2010-12-13 21:37|| Front Page Top

23:37 rammer
23:35 CrazyFool
23:31 JosephMendiola
23:18 abu do you love
23:06 mom
23:03 Pappy
22:48 tu3031
22:35 JAB
22:34 abu do you love
22:31 OldSpook
22:30 abu do you love
22:24 Frank G
22:22 Secret Master
21:37 AzCat
21:15 Frank G
21:15 746
20:40 Water Modem
20:16 Eric Jablow
20:05 Glenmore
19:59 Redneck Jim
19:41 tu3031
19:40 tu3031
19:36 tu3031
19:17 tipper









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com