Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Thu 12/28/2023 View Wed 12/27/2023 View Tue 12/26/2023 View Mon 12/25/2023 View Sun 12/24/2023 View Sat 12/23/2023 View Fri 12/22/2023
1
2023-12-28 Government Corruption
Jack Smith asks judge to block Trump from making ‘partisan political attacks' during trial
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Skidmark 2023-12-28 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11133 views ]  Top

#1 "Whose country is it: our or the damn People?!"?
Posted by Grom the Reflective 2023-12-28 04:17||   2023-12-28 04:17|| Front Page Top

#2 
Given the abilities of the US DC Swamp controlled _ _ _ /_ _ _ _ agencies to snoop, eavesdrop and spy. I have to wonder how secure Trump's Lawyer offices and files are?

Or, is the association of Political DA's, we've seen in action, just picking things to out of the air to tie Trump lawyer group up in court?
Posted by NN2N1 2023-12-28 06:17||   2023-12-28 06:17|| Front Page Top

#3 Jack demands enforcement of Politburo trial standards.
Posted by Super Hose 2023-12-28 07:50||   2023-12-28 07:50|| Front Page Top

#4 Is this guy for real? Even the name is fishy - John Smith? I mean, c'mon, man.
Posted by Mercutio 2023-12-28 08:08||   2023-12-28 08:08|| Front Page Top

#5 "Through public statements, filings, and argument in hearings before the Court...

"NO name calling!"
See Chicago 7 trial.

"All of the convictions were later reversed on appeal and the government declined to retry the case."

All this democrat puppet has is chaff to throw against the wind of the coming campaign and election.
Posted by Skidmark 2023-12-28 08:23||   2023-12-28 08:23|| Front Page Top

#6 Only the prosecution is allowed to make partisan political attacks.
Posted by ed in texas 2023-12-28 08:53||   2023-12-28 08:53|| Front Page Top

#7 Jack S. Smith, wasn't he an Al Capp character?
Posted by Gromble Dribble4342 2023-12-28 09:51||   2023-12-28 09:51|| Front Page Top

#8 I am not a lawyer, but it seems novel to me at best for the prosecution to try to dictate what the defense can and cannot do.
Posted by Tom 2023-12-28 11:16||   2023-12-28 11:16|| Front Page Top

#9 amendment 1
Posted by irish rage boy 2023-12-28 15:10||   2023-12-28 15:10|| Front Page Top

#10 For the libs, “the process is the punishment”
Posted by Warthog 2023-12-28 15:28||   2023-12-28 15:28|| Front Page Top

22:18 Spike Ghibelline2133
22:01 Spike Ghibelline2133
22:01 trailing wife
21:56 Spike Ghibelline2133
21:34 trailing wife
21:15 Spike Ghibelline2133
20:10 Anomalous Sources
19:06 Frank G
19:05 M. Murcek
19:05 Frank G
19:04 Frank G
19:03 Frank G
19:02 M. Murcek
18:51 SteveS
18:34 lord garth
18:30 M. Murcek
18:26 SteveS
18:18 AlmostAnonymous5839
17:45 Ululating Platypus
17:43 Dale
17:36 swksvolFF
17:32 M. Murcek
17:30 Frank G
15:55 Rex Mundi









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com