Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Sat 11/13/2004 View Fri 11/12/2004 View Thu 11/11/2004 View Wed 11/10/2004 View Tue 11/09/2004 View Mon 11/08/2004 View Sun 11/07/2004
1
2004-11-13 Home Front: Economy
Gold prices near 16-year high
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Mark Espinola 2004-11-13 7:31:57 AM|| || Front Page|| [2 views since 2007-05-07]  Top

#1 Gold prices remain near 30 year lows would be more accurate. The US dollar is declining and the price of gold in USD is just reflecting that decline.
Posted by phil_b 2004-11-13 7:58:33 AM||   2004-11-13 7:58:33 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 looks like a good time to buy high and sell low.
Posted by Bill Nelson 2004-11-13 9:06:23 AM||   2004-11-13 9:06:23 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 I thought the Palladium jump was due to the nutty professors who used it in COLD FUSION?
Posted by Shipman 2004-11-13 10:43:09 AM||   2004-11-13 10:43:09 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Wait second... never mind. The nutty professors were before '99.
Posted by Shipman 2004-11-13 10:43:56 AM||   2004-11-13 10:43:56 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Okay, look at this chart and tell me why I should care.
Posted by Tom 2004-11-13 11:14:33 AM||   2004-11-13 11:14:33 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 We could have bought gold almost anytime between 1987 and 1996, sold it this morning, and had a lackluster overall return. And if we bought it in 1980 -- when the media was really hyped up about it -- we would have really been screwed. One more example of why the MSM is not our friend. I'm beginning to think that the folks who go to journalism school are the ones not bright enough to be doctors, lawyers, engineers, accountants, or even politicians.
Posted by Tom 2004-11-13 11:25:39 AM||   2004-11-13 11:25:39 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Shipman: “I thought the Palladium jump was due to the nutty professors who used it in COLD FUSION?”

After a decade of careful research, proponents of Cold Fusion have built a significantly strong case that the DOE is re-evaluating Cold Fusion science. The “nutty” professors may yet be proven correct.
Posted by Anonymous5032 2004-11-13 2:48:12 PM||   2004-11-13 2:48:12 PM|| Front Page Top

#8 Cold fusion may surprise us. There is definitely something there.
Posted by phil_b 2004-11-13 3:47:49 PM||   2004-11-13 3:47:49 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 I'm dropping my turkey gut futures and going long on Palladium. It makes perfect sense. :)
Posted by Shipman 2004-11-13 4:19:43 PM||   2004-11-13 4:19:43 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 
After a decade of careful research, proponents of Cold Fusion have built a significantly strong case that the DOE is re-evaluating Cold Fusion science.


Please tell me it has nothing to do with pions.
Posted by Robert Crawford  2004-11-13 4:25:40 PM|| [http://www.kloognome.com]  2004-11-13 4:25:40 PM|| Front Page Top

00:06 True German Ally
00:03 True German Ally
00:02 mojo
00:00 BigEd
23:57 True German Ally
23:48 BigEd
23:45 Frank G
23:44 Frank G
23:43 Beau
23:41 True German Ally
23:36 lex
23:31 lex
23:19 True German Ally
23:18 True German Ally
23:15 Dishman
23:09 Frank G
23:08 Frank G
23:07 Frank G
23:03 True German Ally
22:59 Dave D.
22:59 .com
22:57 Robert Crawford
22:50 Sherry
22:45 .com









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com