Article

2016-11-23 Home Front: Culture Wars

Nick Cannon: Planned Parenthood Committing ‘Real Genocide' Against Black Americans

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-11-23 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11127 views ] Top

#1 When women voluntarily go in for abortions, it is not genocide on behalf of the executioners. The culprit is a dysfunctional black community.

Posted by Thromons Bluetooth1092 2016-11-23 03:14|| 2016-11-23 03:14|| Front Page Top

#2 Abortion as a form of birth control, sort of explains the motivation for both sides, does it not ?

Additional motivations from the gov't could perhaps be found in the willful support of illegal immigration. An immigration of people who, due to their faith, denounce abortion as well as birth control. At the risk of sounding 'alt-right' I will leave it at that.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-11-23 03:51|| 2016-11-23 03:51|| Front Page Top

#3 The culprit is a dysfunctional black community.

Don't take responsibility for one's own choices, blame everybody else for one's condition, and receive dispensation from one political wing for all your self destructive acts. Reward failure and punish success, guess what you get more of?

Posted by Procopius2k 2016-11-23 07:05|| 2016-11-23 07:05|| Front Page Top

#4 The reality is that our species is not yet ready for birth control.

In pretty much every society that gives women the vote, and has easy access to birth control and sacramentalizes abortion, birth rates drop to demographic implosion levels within two or three generations. Western women in particular have done this, but a quick glance at the rest of the world shows that other nations are following suit as well.

What galls is the reasons that women give for this. When asked, it's always some platitude about "the environment" or "overpopulation" or some other nonsense. The reality is that they are motivated - especially in a post-Christian society - by a desire to maximize lifestyle and affluence, and by fear of losing the same, and by a fear of multiple childbirths damaging their ladyparts and causing incontinence, and by a fear that multiple childbirths will diminish their beauty and sexual currency, limiting their ability to manipulate men and have status versus other women. If that sounds harsh, tough. It's reality, outside of a core of a few decent women.

And yes, there are plenty of amoral, sociopathic men who go along for the ride.

The nation that will dominate in 150 years will be whichever one has women who want to have three or more children (if they are fertile enough to do so) at optimum childbearing age, actually have them in intact monogamous families, in a society where the family and not the apparatus of state is the basic unit of society. Right now the West isn't on that trajectory.

Posted by no mo uro 2016-11-23 07:23|| 2016-11-23 07:23|| Front Page Top

#5 The reality is that they are motivated - especially in a post-Christian society - by a desire to maximize lifestyle and affluence...

No mo uro nails it. Welcome to The Villages.

Posted by Besoeker 2016-11-23 07:46|| 2016-11-23 07:46|| Front Page Top

#6 In addition to no mo uro's essay, I think that another related demotivating factor is that optimum childbearing age, is younger, in the West, than that which society supports. Biology prepares women to give birth earlier than society does. Somehow 30 is past biology's plan.

Posted by AlanC 2016-11-23 08:04|| 2016-11-23 08:04|| Front Page Top

#7 It would seem wise for Christian preachers across America to promote their flocks to have three children each for God. 20 years later the number of believers will outnumber the unbelievers.

Posted by rjschwarz 2016-11-23 11:44|| 2016-11-23 11:44|| Front Page Top

#8 AlanC is talking about prolonged adolescence. Off topic but society keeps kids of all races in high school where they have hardly any freedom and absolutely no earning potential until they are 18 years old. While in high school they are brainwashed with the idea that they must attend college if they want to be successful in our society. That keeps them in that state of minimal freedom and zero earning potential until they are in their mid-twenties which is past their sexual prime. Then they finally get turned loose to try to figure out what they are gonna do only to find there isn't much they can do and they stay in that limbo until their thirties. What are they learning all those years in our school system? Does anybody tell them that their jobs have been taken by workers in other countries? Are they taught how to start businesses of their own? Are they taught any kind of useful job skills? If any of them figure it out it's in spite of the educational system and not because of it. So the girls who get pregnant have no husbands. In the poor black communities they probably only have mothers who never had any better chance than they do. The communities are flooded with drugs due to a lack of border security, the young men lacking in legitimate opportunities turn to crime and up in jail in proportionately far higher numbers than the rest of the population. So yeah, genocide.

Posted by Abu Uluque 2016-11-23 12:01|| 2016-11-23 12:01|| Front Page Top

#9 Interesting that all of our opinionated analysts appear male.

Posted by Skidmark 2016-11-23 12:59|| 2016-11-23 12:59|| Front Page Top

#10 Skidmark, I welcome the female point of view. Let's hear it.

Posted by no mo uro 2016-11-23 13:20|| 2016-11-23 13:20|| Front Page Top

#11 So what if they are male? Being correct is not confined by gender. The content and logic of the argument matters, not the gender of the person delivering it. After all, abortion destroys a male or female human live without differentiation.

Posted by Injun Bucket8891 2016-11-23 14:56|| 2016-11-23 14:56|| Front Page Top

#12 Unregulated abortion and sex education from the moment I child enters the school system are the wet dream of our most liberal and immoral opponents.

What better way to ensure a continual supply of concubines than to ensure that our (too) young children know far to much about sex and that abortion will be there to erase any reminders of the downside of all of this knowledge. The powers that be aren't "worried, and wanting to help" the little jimmy's and susie's of the world--they are far more interested in getting them sexually active and hoping there is a *spillover* from that activity that lands (literally) in their lap.

Posted by Crusader 2016-11-23 15:47|| 2016-11-23 15:47|| Front Page Top

#13 Interesting that all of our opinionated analysts appear to be male.

Since when did the fathers, the mothers parents, anti-abortion women, or the unborn child ever had a vPoice inside the abortion room?

Posted by Male 2016-11-23 16:25|| 2016-11-23 16:25|| Front Page Top

#14 Google Margaret Sanger and eugenics to see the original purpose for planned parenthood.

...Nuf' said...

Posted by BrerRabbit 2016-11-23 18:07|| 2016-11-23 18:07|| Front Page Top

23:50 Zenobia Floger6220
22:47 SteveS
22:11 Pappy
21:57 Glenmore
21:53 Frank G
21:46 trailing wife
21:41 trailing wife
21:38 trailing wife
21:33 trailing wife
21:12 Zenobia Floger6220
21:00 Shipman
20:55 Blossom Unains5562
20:52 Blossom Unains5562
20:52 Shipman
20:49 Shipman
20:40 Shipman
20:38 Shipman
20:32 Shipman
20:30 Blossom Unains5562
20:27 Shipman
20:19 Shipman
20:15 Nimble Spemble
19:58 Zenobia Floger6220
19:14 swksvolFF