Article

2006-11-13 Home Front: WoT

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Fred 2006-11-13 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11125 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 Democratspeak: New Direction == Retreat

Posted by badanov 2006-11-13 00:23|| http://www.freefirezone.org]">[http://www.freefirezone.org] 2006-11-13 00:23|| Front Page Top

#2 Bush is the CINC, DhimmiDonks and the Iraq Study Group notwithstanding. I'd say he has precisely zero reason, now, to placate them. Last 2 years of his last term with an opposition-held Congress which can't afford to be seen shorting the troops and a public which demands good news or else, but soundly against cut 'n run. Must be a wild time for the historians... So many books and lecture circuit tour dates in the offing. Interesting and deadly times.

Posted by .com 2006-11-13 03:42|| 2006-11-13 03:42|| Front Page Top

#3 WND.com > Joseph Farah article CONSERVATIVISM'S DEATH THROES > America is sliding towards SOCIALISM + IMMORALITY [Amorality? Un-Morality?]. Agree in part, disagree in part. Farah fails to recognize that the Lefties are more than willing to resort to wilfully confusing, across-the-board multi-level, vertical = horizontal = oblique, dialecticism + hypocrisies to get its way. 2006 Elex > the Dems have all but formally acknowledged their [ULTRA]CONSERVATIVE, TRUE FUTURE AGENDA - MODERATE/CENTRIST FOR NOW, ULTRA = TOTALITARIAN AS TIME GOES ON. Right now, ALTERNATISM > feel-good, wavy gravy, PC Leftspeak for LIMITED GOVERNMENTISM-WELFARIST ABSOLUTISM. In reality, ALTERNATISM is dead and gone forever, and thats politely presuming that the Left actually believed in its own Altern agenda to begin with. For a while yet, the [potemkinist]Waffle = Egg = Toast Bread luvin' Left will deliber refrain from using the labels SOCIALISM, CONSERVATIVISM, GOVERNMENTISM + ABSOLUTISM + AMERIKAN RED ARMY = PEOPLE'S ARMY when in front of the MSM.

Posted by JosephMendiola 2006-11-13 04:24|| 2006-11-13 04:24|| Front Page Top

#4 I heard on the radio this morning a Dem saying we must redeploy (and I swear he said) after the sectarian violence is controlled.

So mebbe the Donks will adopt the Trunk position, but call it something else?

Posted by Bobby 2006-11-13 06:28|| 2006-11-13 06:28|| Front Page Top

#5 Carl Levin has a history of being a tool of the Pal voters in the Detroit area.

CAIR loves him.

Posted by 3dc 2006-11-13 08:04|| 2006-11-13 08:04|| Front Page Top

#6 Ah, yes, a useful ~~Jew~~ fool.

Posted by wxjames 2006-11-13 08:28|| 2006-11-13 08:28|| Front Page Top

#7 ...I had the thoroughly unpleasant experience of dealing with SEN Levin about 22 years ago while I was stationed at Wurtsmith AFB, MI. He not only treated my troops and as if we were something to scrape off our shoes, he spoke to our wing commander with utter, absolute, and undisguised contempt. Yet he had the balls to be surprised and angry when DOD decided not to base the B-1 at Wurtsmith, primarily because of his attitude towards the military.

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2006-11-13 09:23|| 2006-11-13 09:23|| Front Page Top

#8 So mebbe the Donks will adopt the Trunk position, but call it something else?

Mebbe. The democrats can read polls as good as anyone. The voters may have 'thrown the bums out', but they have doubts about the 'new' bums. Gonna be interesting in 2007.

Posted by Pappy 2006-11-13 10:32|| 2006-11-13 10:32|| Front Page Top

#9 If I remember correctly the US and the other coalition members , as per a couple of UN resolutions,are responsible for Iraq's security until such time as they can do the job themselves. So, are the Democrats gonna buck the UN resolutions?

Posted by Deacon Blues 2006-11-13 12:31|| 2006-11-13 12:31|| Front Page Top

#10 So, are the Democrats gonna buck the UN resolutions?

Should be interesting to see how they ~~waffle, doublespeak, ignore, flip flop, retreat from~~ finesse, interpret and restate what was really meant by these UN resolutions.

Posted by JohnQC 2006-11-13 12:40|| 2006-11-13 12:40|| Front Page Top

23:55 Secret Master
23:48 JosephMendiola
23:33 JosephMendiola
23:19 trailing wife
23:18 Chinter Flarong
23:18 JosephMendiola
23:16 JosephMendiola
23:13 JosephMendiola
23:11 trailing wife
23:10 anon
23:07 trailing wife
23:01 Penguin
22:45 Penguin
22:41 Zenster
22:39 Zenster
22:20 gromgoru
22:06 gromgoru
22:02 tu3031
21:59 gromgoru
21:53 gromgoru
21:53 James
21:48 Broadhead6
21:47 gromgoru
21:35 Slomock Ebbong5742