Article

2011-11-03 Science & Technology

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Anonymoose 2011-11-03 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11126 views ] Top

#1 32 megajoule railgun shot

Posted by Eohippus Phater7165 2011-11-03 00:36|| 2011-11-03 00:36|| Front Page Top

#2 The railgun will be like the tank in the 20th century. Totally changing warfare.

This is a practical 'rods from the gods'

Needs lots of power though. Only really feasible with a nuclear reactor.

Posted by phil_b 2011-11-03 01:18|| 2011-11-03 01:18|| Front Page Top

#3 OTOH what USN Warships would those be, given ...??

* TOPIX > TWELVE US WARSHIPS FACE AXE DUE TO BUDGET BATTLES.

Nine "Ticonderoga"-class CGS + three "Whidbey Island" Amphibs planned for cut in FY 2013 + 2014. SELL THE "TICONDEROGAS" TO INDIA???

AFAICS "Motherships", all-purpose + Drone, BMD-capable, remains the future for the USN + "OWG/Global Navy" [OWG Task Force] in this era of GWCC + the 21st century???

Posted by JosephMendiola 2011-11-03 02:34|| 2011-11-03 02:34|| Front Page Top

#4 The logo at the end of the video reads "Velocitus Eradico". :-)

Posted by gorb 2011-11-03 06:36|| 2011-11-03 06:36|| Front Page Top

#5 Loosely translated as 'Speed kills'?

Posted by Glenmore 2011-11-03 07:16|| 2011-11-03 07:16|| Front Page Top

#6 I saw the video and aftereffects of such a round hitting a decommissioned M-1 Abrams tank. Holy macanarsels.

At that velocity, it actually engages the surface tension of steel, shattering the tank like it was made of glass. Comparatively, like a rubber ball dipped in liquid nitrogen, that shatters.

Posted by Anonymoose 2011-11-03 09:23|| 2011-11-03 09:23|| Front Page Top

#7 Imagine a flotilla with these laying siege to an inland city, block by block.

Posted by Water Modem 2011-11-03 10:53|| 2011-11-03 10:53|| Front Page Top

#8 Artillery is back as the Queen of Battles.

Posted by g(r)omgoru 2011-11-03 11:23|| 2011-11-03 11:23|| Front Page Top

#9 Of course the real question is could a single railgun-equipped ship bring down the Roman Empire?

Posted by CrazyFool 2011-11-03 11:44|| 2011-11-03 11:44|| Front Page Top

#10 Maybe time to bring some of the battleships back out of retirement and load a mess of these things on them.

Posted by Laurence of the Rats 2011-11-03 12:45|| 2011-11-03 12:45|| Front Page Top

#11 A flotilla of ships each with a rail gun firing 10shots/min, each shot more than equal to a 1000lb bomb....
So 1 gun in one min = 5 tons of HE.
10000/5 = 2000 min with one gun = Hiroshima explosive power
2000/20 = 100 or 100 guns in 20 mins = Hiroshima

It' could be a real game changer just on tonnage. Now that it is very accurate hi-velocity tonnage with quick time on delivery and no explosive power in the shell itself makes it a total game changer.

Posted by Water Modem 2011-11-03 14:03|| 2011-11-03 14:03|| Front Page Top

#12 each shot more than equal to a 1000lb bomb....

33MJ at the muzzle is the energy in one gallon of gasoline or 17 pounds of TNT. That's about 2/3 the HE in a 155mm HE shell.

Posted by Eohippus Phater7165 2011-11-03 14:26|| 2011-11-03 14:26|| Front Page Top

#13 Ignorant question perhaps, but is it strictly a straight shot kind of a weapon or can a trajectory be put on it like artillery?

Posted by Ebbang Uluque6305 2011-11-03 14:52|| 2011-11-03 14:52|| Front Page Top

#14 There is a difference between muzzle velocity and explosive power.

I wonder if they could bring the Iowa class back, put a nuke in it and automate it for a smaller crew and mount railguns. A large mass platform might be handy.

Posted by Speamble Wittlesbach8094 2011-11-03 15:02|| 2011-11-03 15:02|| Front Page Top

#15 any 2 reactor ship should work...

Posted by Water Modem 2011-11-03 15:58|| 2011-11-03 15:58|| Front Page Top

#16 Do these things have recoil?

Posted by Speamble Wittlesbach8094 2011-11-03 16:53|| 2011-11-03 16:53|| Front Page Top

#17 > Do these things have recoil?

Have Newton's Laws of Motion been over-turned while you were napping?

Posted by Bright Pebbles 2011-11-03 18:13|| 2011-11-03 18:13|| Front Page Top

#18 Recoil is actually a good question.

"The seat of the recoil force is still debated. The traditional equations predict that the recoil force acts on the breech of the railgun. Another school of thought invokes Ampère's force law and asserts that it acts along the length of the rails (which is their strongest axis). The rails also repel themselves via a sideways force caused by the rails being pushed by the magnetic field, just as the projectile is. The rails need to survive this without bending, and must be very securely mounted."

This is also a factor in the type of rail gun being used, as this would apply to a traditional rail gun. But there is also a hybrid rail gun that uses a thin conductive film behind the round.

As the vast current flows through it, it is turned into a conductive plasma that is more like traditional explosives, that starts the round moving forward, and then the traditional rail gun accelerates the round even more.

This most definitely gets a lot of more typical breech recoil.

Posted by Anonymoose 2011-11-03 19:23|| 2011-11-03 19:23|| Front Page Top

23:47 Blackbeard Henbane9927
23:37 trailing wife
23:07 SteveS
23:06 CrazyFool
23:04 Procopius2k
22:52 Zhang Fei
22:40 trailing wife
22:38 Dale
22:34 Zhang Fei
22:31 Dale
22:09 Secret Master
22:03 raubrey@sbcglobal.net
21:55 Dogsbody
21:47 trailing wife
21:47 CrazyFool
21:42 Dale
21:35 rjschwarz
21:29 Dale
21:23 rjschwarz
21:22 Dale
21:21 Dale
21:13 Alaska Paul
21:12 Alaska Paul
21:06 trailing wife