Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Fri 09/14/2012 View Thu 09/13/2012 View Wed 09/12/2012 View Tue 09/11/2012 View Mon 09/10/2012 View Sun 09/09/2012 View Sat 09/08/2012
1
2012-09-14 -Election 2012
White House details 'destructive' spending cuts
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by DarthVader 2012-09-14 16:23|| || Front Page|| [3 views ]  Top

#1 Oh, and mods I have really no idea where this should go. Seedy pols, because of the politics, but at the same time WoTB since it will gut a lot of our defense at a time when AlQ is on the offensive.
Posted by DarthVader 2012-09-14 16:28||   2012-09-14 16:28|| Front Page Top

#2 Seedy Pols works fir me, DarthVader.
Posted by trailing wife 2012-09-14 16:57||   2012-09-14 16:57|| Front Page Top

#3 But it'as all the Trunks fault! Send me FORWARD! I have a PLAN! - BHO
Posted by Bobby 2012-09-14 17:14||   2012-09-14 17:14|| Front Page Top

#4 It's seedy pols, not WoT.

I wouldn't mind a $109 billion cut in the budget. On a $4300 billion budget, the proposed sequestration is a nice first step.

Go ahead and try to scare me, President Ladies-Tee.

I say this as an NIH grant holder. The cuts will be painful to many, but we can't keep spending at the current rate.
Posted by Steve White 2012-09-14 17:30||   2012-09-14 17:30|| Front Page Top

#5 The cuts fall particularly heavy on the federal civilian workforce, where staffing levels and salaries would be docked more than 8 percent almost across the board.

Every cloud has a silver lining. I'm all for a net 10% cut. Start with the entire Dept. of Education & Energy and go on from there.
Posted by AlanC 2012-09-14 17:42||   2012-09-14 17:42|| Front Page Top

#6 "The cuts fall particularly heavy on the federal civilian workforce"

And your point.... ?
Posted by Barbara 2012-09-14 19:07||   2012-09-14 19:07|| Front Page Top

#7 I would have started with TSA, EPA, FDA, USDA, NEA, and several isms.
Posted by Dale 2012-09-14 19:40||   2012-09-14 19:40|| Front Page Top

#8 Homeland Security would be a great place to start.
Posted by DarthVader 2012-09-14 20:47||   2012-09-14 20:47|| Front Page Top

#9 reports earlier this week that many defense contractors intend to issue the 60 day pre-layoff notice. it hits just before the election. wonder if this is the reason for Bo's concern, now....
Posted by USN, Ret. 2012-09-14 22:18||   2012-09-14 22:18|| Front Page Top

23:47 JosephMendiola
23:41 JosephMendiola
23:38 JosephMendiola
23:19 Chuck Simmins
22:46 Shiter Poodle8362
22:18 USN, Ret.
22:15 USN, Ret.
21:24 tipper
21:00 Secret Asian Man
20:58 Broadhead6
20:55 JosephMendiola
20:49 Alaska Paul
20:47 DarthVader
20:44 Broadhead6
20:40 JosephMendiola
20:35 Dale
20:12 JosephMendiola
20:09 Procopius2k
20:08 mojo
20:05 Dale
19:41 JosephMendiola
19:40 Dale
19:24 Barbara
19:07 Barbara









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com