Article

2004-09-26 -Short Attention Span Theater-

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Steve White 2004-09-26 12:34:28 AM|| || Front Page|| [11127 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 That confirms it. Scientifically, men are superior to women. Time to admit it ladies.

Posted by Capt America 2004-09-26 1:40:52 AM|| 2004-09-26 1:40:52 AM|| Front Page Top

#2 Well you can say that, then run like hell. LOL

Posted by Sock Puppet of Doom 2004-09-26 2:06:42 AM|| [http://www.slhess.com] 2004-09-26 2:06:42 AM|| Front Page Top

#3 We are have large muscles and can run good.

Posted by Shipman 2004-09-26 7:13:07 AM|| 2004-09-26 7:13:07 AM|| Front Page Top

#4 Did the UN fund this?

Posted by tu3031 2004-09-26 8:59:38 AM|| 2004-09-26 8:59:38 AM|| Front Page Top

#5 Back in the 80s, some researchers were testing new computer-based models for metabolic processes and, in the process, discovered that PCBs are carried across cell-membranes by estrogen.

Since all the safety studies on PCBs had been done with college-age males, the scientific consensus on safe levels of exposure were way too low, as they failed to account for the fact that women of all ages, and older men, have significantly higher estrogen levels than those undergrad guys.

That set off a big search for other such effects. The 70s style feminism that said there are no differences always struck this woman as stupid ... as did the suggestion that women are inherently social and consensus oriented and men are power hungry jerks.

Posted by rkb 2004-09-26 10:05:43 AM|| 2004-09-26 10:05:43 AM|| Front Page Top

#6 Anyone who thinks that women are inherently social and consensus oriented has never sat in on a women-run big-charity board meeting. Brrr!

Posted by trailing wife 2004-09-26 11:16:19 AM|| 2004-09-26 11:16:19 AM|| Front Page Top

#7 Scientifically, men are superior to women.

I don't know about that. I've never met a man superior to J-Lo.

Posted by Bulldog 2004-09-26 11:21:14 AM|| 2004-09-26 11:21:14 AM|| Front Page Top

#8 Yes, men are incredibly different from women.

Gott sei dank!

Posted by Barbara Skolaut 2004-09-26 6:58:00 PM|| 2004-09-26 6:58:00 PM|| Front Page Top

#9 J-LO???!!

Oh, Bulldog, we just have to get you out of the UK for some reality therapy.

Posted by Anonymous6662 2004-09-26 7:03:04 PM|| 2004-09-26 7:03:04 PM|| Front Page Top

#10 Depends on which area she's "superior"...

Posted by Fred 2004-09-26 7:13:30 PM|| 2004-09-26 7:13:30 PM|| Front Page Top

#11 I am a simple man. All I ask for is a decent-sized butt.

Posted by Bulldog 2004-09-26 7:20:30 PM|| 2004-09-26 7:20:30 PM|| Front Page Top

#12 Then you have chosen well.

Posted by Whiskey Mike 2004-09-26 7:43:38 PM|| 2004-09-26 7:43:38 PM|| Front Page Top

#13 Bulldog: In that case, I believe Roseanne Barr is available......

Posted by Anonymous6668 2004-09-26 7:45:30 PM|| 2004-09-26 7:45:30 PM|| Front Page Top

#14 J-Lo is a bit sensitive about her rather ample posterior. Bulldog you might offend her.

Posted by Fawad 2004-09-26 7:46:06 PM|| 2004-09-26 7:46:06 PM|| Front Page Top

21:25 Anonymous
21:25 Anonymous
21:17 Anonymous
21:17 Anonymous
21:16 Anonymous6672
21:16 Anonymous6672
21:13 Anonymous6672
21:13 Anonymous6672
07:26 Silk
19:18 Moroccan Arab
19:57 Mrs. Davis
19:56 Sock Puppet of Doom
19:52 muck4doo
19:45 Moroccan Arab
08:14 badanov
08:01 Tom
07:37 Ptah
06:35 Anonymous6334 TROLL
04:51 trailing wife
02:42 Asedwich
02:28 Asedwich
02:00 ed
01:19 Phil Fraering
01:19 Memesis