Article

2005-09-13 Europe

Red America, Blue Europe: Europe Learns the Wrong Lessons

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Captain America 2005-09-13 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11129 views since 2007-05-07] Top

#1 To say the truth the French (1) had already their hands full of trouble in Vietnam (2). The other factor was the strength of the Communist Party after the Resistance (3) who limited the options of the government

(1) at that time the "Atlantist party" was strong, today it has disappeared. The atlantist political formations have become strong EU proponents and, since they dream of the EU replacing America as world leader, hate it.

(2) When they returned to Vietnam, the French "Koreans" became the most combative of the French troops since they had seen communism in action. For the record, when the Vietminh anihilated the Groupemnt Mobile 101 (portrayed at the start of "We were soldiers") a company of Korea veterans managed to break the encirclement so it wasn't anihilated like the remainder of the Groupement

(3) By the end of the War, the Communist Party was getting 30% of the votes. That was due in no small part to the Nazi habit of attributting every act of sabotage to the Communists, whatever the real authors so people began to believe they were the only real resistants (also booming makes for better propaganda than passing info to the allies, other resistance movements feared endangering civilians they couldn't protect agaisnt germain repraisals) and forgot their german-friendly attitude before invasion of Soviet Union.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-09-13 04:16|| 2005-09-13 04:16|| Front Page Top

#2 That, and the French have never met a bloody-handed dictator whose boot they won't lick.

Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford 2005-09-13 07:46|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2005-09-13 07:46|| Front Page Top

#3 The entire article should be read.

Rather than being a military discussion, or an invitation to Frog bashing, it is an appraisal of the current direction of Europe of which diplomatic and military impotence is only one dimension. Reading it became more and more depressing.

The conclusion speaks to how we need to work with our allies in Europe to help it revive. But Europe's path to becoming the next Russia is clear. Soon what we today see as dhimmitude will become Islamization as westerners die off and muslims inherit the ruins.

We should prepare to remove all our forces from Europe before they are caught up in its next round of pointless slaughter. At a certain point our forces become hostages in Europe's civil war. If the Europeans will not defend themselves, we should not delude them into believeing we will do it for them. Nor should we leave our troops in the middle on a fool's errand. We should make it clear to the UK that they face a choice, remain in the Free World or join Europe. Then leave the Europeans to lie in the bed they've made.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-09-13 08:21|| 2005-09-13 08:21|| Front Page Top

#4 France followed, providing all of 1,119 troops.

IIRC those were mostly French Foreign Legionaires who were to a significant number former members of the Wehrmarcht.

Posted by Phereque Omineger4095 2005-09-13 08:44|| 2005-09-13 08:44|| Front Page Top

#5 We should prepare to remove all our forces

And offer to shelter anything of cultural signifigance that can be moved.

Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford 2005-09-13 08:57|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2005-09-13 08:57|| Front Page Top

#6 RC, correct. Tthe time will come when the big questions are, when should we loosen green card restricitions on Europeans, and when will we start granting political asylum.

Posted by Mrs. Davis 2005-09-13 09:12|| 2005-09-13 09:12|| Front Page Top

#7 Mr Crawford

For obvious reasons I would be glad if you didn't use my posts for French bashing. One of the points of my posts was to highlight the error (mostly during the Clinton administrations) of encouraging the transformation of the EU from a mere free-trade zone into something political. As the centrists in Europe, not only in France, began to dream about Europe becoming the next dominat power, the logical consequence was challenging the defending champion. European far left ver hated America. Same for the far right (in case of France we have to add the gaullists, but the bruises inflicted on De Gaulle by the Roosevelt administration played a role) but America could count on the moderates. Thanks to the EU dream now the moderates hate America at least as much as the others.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-09-13 09:38|| 2005-09-13 09:38|| Front Page Top

#8 JFM. not all of us are French bashers. I for one regularly point out that we need France to show us 'the other (better) way'. Nuclear power and vaccines come to mind, but I am sure there are many others.

Posted by phil_b 2005-09-13 09:52|| 2005-09-13 09:52|| Front Page Top

#9 JFM, no offense to you or to other Frenchmen who support the US, but when I look at the actions of the French government, I see them supporting the bloody-handed dictators over the US.

Posted by Robert Crawford">Robert Crawford 2005-09-13 09:59|| http://www.kloognome.com/]">[http://www.kloognome.com/] 2005-09-13 09:59|| Front Page Top

#10 IIRC those were mostly French Foreign Legionaires who were to a significant number former members of the Wehrmarcht.

And to a still more significant part former members of Free France: After the campaign of Narvik part of the Foreign Legion was in the UK when France fell. Since their officers (all French) rallied Free France the privates and NCOs followed. I don't know what happenned with those Foreign Legionnaires who had been born Germans: were they interned? did they desert? or did they end at Bir Hakeim shooting at Rommel's troops?

BTW, since I mentionned the French veterans of Korea in GM101, I don't remember any mention of them being of the Foreign Legion or of the presence of people of the Foreign Legion in it. I could be wrong however

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-09-13 10:09|| 2005-09-13 10:09|| Front Page Top

#11 RC

At that time the French government supported America and France was about the only nation providing state of the art weaponry to Israel. Times have changed for the worse.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-09-13 10:18|| 2005-09-13 10:18|| Front Page Top

#12 RC

I wouldn't want to interfere on your constitutional rights to French bashing. :-) Just that I don't like when it is done on a post that I had posted to put the things in perspective, still more when IMHO your bashing is unfair to the people I was talking about.

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-09-13 10:48|| 2005-09-13 10:48|| Front Page Top

#13 Phereque Omineger4095 writes:

IIRC those were mostly French Foreign Legionaires

I am sorry to disappoint you but the Bataillon de CorÃ©e was not Foreign Legion. It was formed from volunteers of regular french units. Commanded by a living legend of Free France who had accepted to go down four ranks (from Corps general to lieutenant colonel) in order to command it.

The batalion got three American Presidential citations

Posted by JFM">JFM 2005-09-13 13:26|| 2005-09-13 13:26|| Front Page Top

#14 Rather than being a military discussion, or an invitation to Frog bashing, it is an appraisal of the current direction of Europe...

It *is* a good article; both thoght provoking and depressing. Definitely a must read.

But can we still have Frog bashing? And some whale curry, too? ( Apologies to both JFM and Shamu )

Posted by SteveS 2005-09-13 13:26|| 2005-09-13 13:26|| Front Page Top

23:43 C-Low
23:43 DMFD
23:33 ed
23:20 ryuge
23:18 Mike
23:05 RWV
23:01 Barbara Skolaut
22:55 RWV
22:50 RWV
22:47 ed
22:41 GK
22:33 Frank G
22:30 trailing wife
22:26 Frank G
22:23 Phil Fraering
22:15 DanNY
22:11 trailing wife
22:10 ed
22:10 Barbara Skolaut
22:10 Robert Crawford
22:07 Ross Perot
22:07 Robert Crawford
22:06 ed
22:06 Frank G