Article

2024-09-07 Home Front: Politix

18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy Against Civil Rights. Whom would you indict?

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by NN2N1 2024-09-07 00:00|| || Front Page|| [11137 views ] Top
File under: Tin Hat Dictators, Presidents for Life, & Kleptocrats

#1 The only problem is that DoJ is technically the enforcer and will not act against anyone who is a member of the party. The entire Civil Rights division should be converted to prosecuting this violation. You'll only need to get a few heads for some attitude adjustment.

Posted by Procopius2k 2024-09-07 07:32|| 2024-09-07 07:32|| Front Page Top

#2 Let's not forget 242:

Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

Posted by Mercutio 2024-09-07 09:46|| 2024-09-07 09:46|| Front Page Top

#3 Consider the act of Nonfeasance-"Nonfeasance is the failure to act or do something that one is obligated to do."

The massive increase in the selective use of "prosecutorial discretion" by law enforcement at federal, state and even local levels officials is actually willful nonfeasance by those obligated to enforce the law uniformly and fully. This widespread tactic at both DOJ and local District Attorneys has been used to elect favor from political allies and conversely, punish vigorously theor political enemies. The cases of Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro vs. Eric Holder are a perfect example.

Posted by NoMoreBS 2024-09-07 17:56|| 2024-09-07 17:56|| Front Page Top

23:51 Skidmark
23:48 Skidmark
21:40 Jack Salami
21:30 ruprecht
20:37 Harry Platypus2574
19:52 Elmerert Hupens2660
19:09 Rex Mundi
19:06 Rex Mundi
19:02
18:36 Throlush Dark Lord of the Nebraskans2736
18:23 European Conservative
18:10 trailing wife
18:03 trailing wife
17:59 Bangkok Billy
17:56 NoMoreBS
17:22 Procopius2k
17:01 European Conservative
16:58 Skidmark
16:55 Skidmark
16:51 Procopius2k
16:31 trailing wife
16:30 Squinty+Hatfield8204
16:21 Squinty+Hatfield8204
16:20 trailing wife