Archived material Access restricted Article
Rantburg

Today's Front Page   View All of Wed 09/04/2019 View Tue 09/03/2019 View Mon 09/02/2019 View Sun 09/01/2019 View Sat 08/31/2019 View Fri 08/30/2019 View Thu 08/29/2019
1
2019-09-04 Home Front: Culture Wars
Christine Blasey Ford's Attorney Said She Was Partly Motivated By Desire To Defend Roe V Wade
Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-09-04 01:56|| || Front Page|| [10327 views ]  Top

#1 F---ing liar.

I gather that the slut has immunity from prosecution thanks to the Congressional exception, but she ought to be horsewhipped.

These disgusting lies against Kavanaugh must not be allowed to stand.

No one who participated in this national disgrace should be allowed to escape the harshest possible censure and public shaming.
Posted by Lex 2019-09-04 02:14||   2019-09-04 02:14|| Front Page Top

#2 Hindsight history retold.
Posted by Dale 2019-09-04 04:28||   2019-09-04 04:28|| Front Page Top

#3 ....Waitaminnit....

"If they could be persuaded that Justice Kavanaugh was a predator, then they might not accept a future ruling by the five Republican-appointed justices altering the right to obtain an abortion established by Roe v. Wade..."

...What do you mean, 'might not accept'? It's the Supreme Court, you fools, not the Dungeon Master for a Friday night game of D&D - you don't get to decide whether or not you 'accept' it, you DO and you go on.

Congratulations, folks, this is what we've come to after decades of legislating from the bench: if they think that a call might go the other way, they don't have to 'accept' it. (NOTE: does not apply to any decisions that we might not accept. Know your place, peasant.)

Mike

Posted by Mike Kozlowski 2019-09-04 04:30||   2019-09-04 04:30|| Front Page Top

#4 But mostly by a desire to shine
Posted by g(r)omgoru PB 2019-09-04 05:02||   2019-09-04 05:02|| Front Page Top

#5 Lies in support of "the greater truth." The lefty lingua franca....
Posted by M. Murcek 2019-09-04 07:45||   2019-09-04 07:45|| Front Page Top

#6 What a surprise! IMO boodle and self enrichment at the expense of Kavanaugh was also a motive.
Posted by JohnQC 2019-09-04 07:55||   2019-09-04 07:55|| Front Page Top

#7 Her body language during confirmation testimony revealed Stage-4 moonbattery.
Posted by Besoeker 2019-09-04 08:56||   2019-09-04 08:56|| Front Page Top

#8 Her lies were so many and so transparent, they reeked to heaven.

She told absurd lies about her "trauma," including supposed fear of flying - even though she flew cross-country to D.C. for the circus hearings, and even though she routinely flies f---ing long-haul flights across the Pacific Ocean for her surfing vacations.

She lied about her / her hubby's separate Palo Alto home entrance for their renter - and concocted an absolutely ridiculous lie about how this separate address was actually an escape route to soothe her traumatized nerves.

Her high school reputation was as a slut with an early and frequent penchant for oral sex. Her lawyers and media flacks and Dem handlers bullied everyone around her to such an extent that these former classmates refused to publicly state what they privately acknowledged: if this liar had truly been traumatized as a schoolgirl, that event must have happened long before she ever met Kavanaugh because her sluttish behavior was consistent throughout her school days. College sorority sisters agreed she was a party girl with a drug habit.

According to her live-in boyfriend of nine years, she never mentioned anything remotely like a traumatic event. This ex- also testified under oath that he witnessed the nutjob coaching her FBI-applicant friend on how to pass a polygraph exam - in direct contradiction to her sworn statement that she never received or gave any training in how to game polygraphs.

This disgusting specimen needs to be publicly shamed and scorned.

Her filthy and outrageous lies must not be allowed to stand.
Posted by Lex 2019-09-04 09:40||   2019-09-04 09:40|| Front Page Top

#9 Well, yeah. That and the money.
Posted by Abu Uluque 2019-09-04 10:26||   2019-09-04 10:26|| Front Page Top

#10 Surprise = 0
Posted by Iblis 2019-09-04 10:46||   2019-09-04 10:46|| Front Page Top

#11 This means her motive to come forward was political, at least in part. In other words she came forward to create a political impression on all who heard her based on her political beliefs.
This sounds so like the politically motivated hoaxes that have occurred often at colleges, which have been used to provoke hatred of republicans that proved to be created by leftists.
That prominent democrats supported her is shameful to themselves and their party.
Posted by Daniel 2019-09-04 19:04||   2019-09-04 19:04|| Front Page Top

#12 She was put forward with the connivance of Chi-Com Spy-supporting Di-Fi
Posted by Frank G 2019-09-04 19:47||   2019-09-04 19:47|| Front Page Top

#13 That prominent democrats supported her is shameful to themselves and their party.

The Left has no shame. However, they're more than happy to heap it on others. It's all about power.
Posted by Procopius2k 2019-09-04 20:38||   2019-09-04 20:38|| Front Page Top

23:38 CrazyFool
23:16 Thimp Clusort2035
22:46 SteveS
22:44 SR-71
22:31 Injun Bucket8891
21:44 Anomalous Sources
21:32 Chunky White8091
21:20 SteveS
20:55 magpie
20:39 Procopius2k
20:38 Procopius2k
20:35 Procopius2k
20:31 Procopius2k
19:51 746
19:47 Frank G
19:45 CrazyFool
19:29 Frank G
19:16 Vernal Hatrick
19:13 Vernal Hatrick
19:12 Vernal Hatrick
19:06 Daniel
19:04 Daniel
19:00 Omorong Black8889
18:53 M. Murcek









Paypal:
Google
Search WWW Search rantburg.com