Article

2010-07-19 Home Front: Politix

Mass. may join effort to bypass Electoral College

Archived material is restricted to Rantburg regulars and members. If you need access email fred.pruitt=at=gmail.com with your nick to be added to the members list. There is no charge to join Rantburg as a member.

Posted by Delphi 2010-07-19 13:03|| || Front Page|| [11136 views ] Top

#1 My first reaction to this article is to wonder this: Where is the empirical evidence that this law would make the system work better? How do I know that the results of this law would be better than, say, going back to having state legislatures elect our national Senators?

In other words, most would agree that it is appropriate to strike a proper balance between republican (with a lower case 'r')and democratic (with a lower case 'd') tendencies in our government. Why should I believe that moving the weight further over to the democratic side of the scale is necessarily good? In what way is having candidates focus on battleground states less desirable than the alternative? Is this proposal an attempt to sound 'well-intentioned' by people who have no idea about the ramifications and unintended consequences the law would entail?

Just asking.

Posted by ryuge 2010-07-19 15:17|| 2010-07-19 15:17|| Front Page Top

#2 ".. say that the current Electoral College system is confusing and causes candidates to focus unduly on a handful of battleground states."
The 'majority rules' way means candidates only need to focus on major population States. And the difference is...? Sounds like algore is still crying about not carrying TN in '00.

Posted by Muggsy Glink 2010-07-19 18:10|| 2010-07-19 18:10|| Front Page Top

#3 ".. say that the current Electoral College system is confusing and causes candidates to focus unduly on a handful of battleground states."
The 'majority rules' way means candidates only need to focus on major population States. And the difference is...? Sounds like algore is still crying about not carrying TN in '00.

Posted by Muggsy Glink 2010-07-19 18:11|| 2010-07-19 18:11|| Front Page Top

#4 Time to start sanctioning various...people.

Posted by Secret Asian Man 2010-07-19 18:51|| 2010-07-19 18:51|| Front Page Top

#5 The traditional argument against direct elections is that the advertising imperative would render rural and flyover areas irrelevant to the candidates, who would concentrate all their attention in the top ten to twenty media markets. More bang for the media buck.

However, as the older TV generation slowly dies off, and as people access more and more of their political info through servers rather than via braodcast signals, I'm not sure that objection still holds. As Barry and now Palin have shown, you can raise money nationally and overnight without spending anything on TV ads.

Posted by lex 2010-07-19 19:30|| 2010-07-19 19:30|| Front Page Top

#6 Luther Martin must be spinning in his grave. But he's probably to obscure and confusing for the folks in Maryland to relate to. Dumphuchs.

Posted by Nimble Spemble 2010-07-19 20:37|| 2010-07-19 20:37|| Front Page Top

#7 If enacted, this states law would seem to undercut the power of the electorate of Massachusetts. Why would you specifically campaign in Mass, when they award their electoral votes based on national results?

Posted by Super Hose 2010-07-19 20:56|| 2010-07-19 20:56|| Front Page Top

#8 So if you live in Mass. don't bother voting. Your legislature and the other states will decide for you.

Posted by AuburnTom 2010-07-19 21:30|| 2010-07-19 21:30|| Front Page Top

#9 Funny thing is, it would have had Mass' votes going for Bush II in the reelection of 04, despite being Kerry's home state.

Its a fundamental difference between democrat who promote the rule of the mob, and those who wish to keep our Republic of Laws where individuals are paramount.

Posted by OldSpook 2010-07-19 22:35|| 2010-07-19 22:35|| Front Page Top

#10 America is dead. This is now Rome - two years before it's destruction.

Posted by newc 2010-07-19 23:38|| 2010-07-19 23:38|| Front Page Top

00:06 JosephMendiola
23:57 newc
23:53 JosephMendiola
23:46 tipover
23:43 JosephMendiola
23:39 newc
23:38 newc
23:35 JosephMendiola
23:35 Lone Ranger
23:20 bigjim-CA
23:19 OldSpook
23:19 JosephMendiola
23:16 bigjim-CA
22:42 Sherry
22:36 Deacon Blues
22:35 OldSpook
22:30 OldSpook
22:23 trailing wife
22:22 gorb
22:18 gorb
22:17 gorb
22:15 Grunter in Flatland
22:12 Hugh Jass
22:04 JosephMendiola